Boxing amateur as amazing as Lomachenko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HI-TECH Boxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 2542
    • 131
    • 86
    • 11,371

    #51
    Originally posted by yngwie
    Stanionis looks good to me, he is tough, has a good promoter in Schaefer and imo he can be a contender at least.
    Giyasov imo is too raw, athletic, but i have never been impressed by him, although i was never impressed by Gaibnazarov until he turned pro, anyways, Zoirov, Dusmatov and Melekuziev are far better prospects.
    Kelly is a little overrated i feel, he acts like the second coming of Roy Jones, but he actually can be quite beatable at the top level, if anything, when he fights people should think at the actual potential of Daniyar who is better than Kelly in every department besides beauty
    Rabii is my guy, for me he was always the guy that needed to turn pro from welterweight, he picks his punches extremely well, is fast, has good technique and as a pro is scoring one punch ko's, if he is mentally ready, he is a future champion.
    I don't rate McCormack high at all.
    I think Giyasov could be a good pro. If I'm remembering correctly he out-fought Stanionis and Rabii at the Olympics. He can get a little wild at times, but should make for fun, interesting fights in the future.
    Yeah, Kelly is getting a little overrated. Most prospects get overrated though. Ryan Garcia is also getting overrated in my opinion. I also think Yeleussinov is better than Kelly in every department. Daniyar made easy work of Kelly at the Olympics. He even made Kelly look silly at times.
    I also like Rabii. Can't wait to see how his career pans out. He seems to have a great pro style, but only time will tell if he is the truth.
    I'm the opposite as I rate McCormack very highly. I think he is better than Kelly.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP