Comments Thread For: The Argument For (And Against) Lomachenko Being #1 P4P
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Haha. Come,on,pete rose. Broner c level hype job who looked lile **** anytime he stepped up. Who was in physical prime? Zlaticanin? And yeah beating a 37 yr old who had a reputation of being a ring iq wizard who was feared by all including tyson is a big win. The guy everyone said was an alltime great. Top 20 all time lol. The guy who begged for the fight. And also the guy who got mastered, exposed as a one diminsional "fighter" and one who has nothing but a plan a is a good win. Not great because i always said rigo was a hype job that the dorks liked to hype, and that he would get broken down mentally by loma and he did. Just like loma,would easily beat mikey. I know i know ppl will say thats ****** but remember that ppl thought it was ****** to say he would school russell, walters, rigo etc. 4 opponents quitting halfway through a scheduled 12 rd fight is very special.Comment
-
With his record he can do no wrong at this time. He is a gem in the lower weight classesComment
-
Comment
-
1: Thurman
2: Crawford
3: Garcia

If he chases "Greatness" and jumps up divisions (Garcia), just as his last opponent did. Then he would p4p. YOU DONT GET P4P FOR BEATING SOMEONE YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BEAT.
Last edited by HURTFEELINGS; 12-16-2017, 05:18 PM.Comment
-
-
You Sir should stop using common sense , logic and facts because it upsets the people in this forum....my I add that mikey quit on salido and mikey also bailed on Top Rank when Arum wanted to pit him against gamboa.....I felt like Salido was gonna spark mikey up when robert and mikey called it off ......I dont like Arum (political differences)but he sure does put up quality fights and has good fighters in his stable plus he is not scared to match them up toughNo, but if Lomachenko is DEMANDED to box against Mikey Garcia and Terence Crawford (both who are above his own natural weight division), then going by the same logic, reasoning and standard, both Mikey Garcia and Terence Crawford should also box against Canelo Alvarez and Gennady Golovkin (against opponents above their own nautural weight divisions as well).
If Lomachenko shouldn't be ranked number 1 pound for pound because he hasn't beaten the likes of Mikey Garcia and Terence Crawford yet. Then who else deserves to be ranked pound for pound number 1 because they accomplished better feats?Last edited by TexasCowBoy; 12-16-2017, 08:33 PM.Comment
-
Can't argue with you there!!! For only like 10 pro fights under his belt??? That's why I wont argue he's P4P#1. Did he lose bfore?? Yes but he erased it in record time. To me when it comes to the 2 P4P #1's its what do you favor. Uniting ALL the belts in a division easily???
Or destroying P4Pers??? I have NO issue with anyone saying Crawford or Loma.Last edited by Shadoww702; 12-16-2017, 08:40 PM.Comment
Comment