Originally posted by Boxing Goat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I think Vasyl Lomachenko is the best fighter I've ever seen.
Collapse
-
-
I like Loma and he's quite good. He's neither the best fighter I've seen nor even the best fighter right now. I'll wait to crown him when he proves something, starting with Mikey and Crawford.
The Rigo fight proves nothing at all-- too old, too small, too inactive. Loma had also lost to journeyman Salido. You can't brush all that aside or blind yourself to it and proclaim him the best.
Wait and see.Last edited by BoxingIsGreat; 12-11-2017, 12:08 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by White Willy View PostLike, fighters who's careers I've seen unfolding. Lived through their eras. I don't think I've ever seen anyone as good. Roy Jones Jr. and Prince Naseem had that untouchable vibe in their primes. But Lomachenko is on another level.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing Goat View PostIf Rigo couldn't find him with his ring IQ and speed, Mikey definitely won't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by White Willy View PostLike, fighters who's careers I've seen unfolding. Lived through their eras. I don't think I've ever seen anyone as good. Roy Jones Jr. and Prince Naseem had that untouchable vibe in their primes. But Lomachenko is on another level.
Comment
-
You've sat there and watch Lomachenko lose. How can he be the greatest thing you've ever seen? He's super flashy , but damn.
Comment
-
The problem with Loma is that he lacks punching power like all the greats. Even Floyd had punching power at 130.
He makes guys quit because he outskills them........ but if he goes up against another tough smotherer at a higher weight class. He will get beat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View PostI like Loma and he's quite good. He's neither the best fighter I've seen nor even the best fighter right now. I'll wait to crown him when he proves something, starting with Mikey and Crawford.
The Rigo fight proves nothing at all-- too old, too small, too inactive. Loma had also lost to journeyman Salido. You can't brush all that aside or blind yourself to it and proclaim him the best.
Wait and see.
By me using your logic, I'll wait to crown Mikey Garcia and Terence Crawford when they prove something, starting with Gennady Golovkin, Artur Beterbiev and Oleksandr Usyk.
Let's apply similar standards here!
Also according to you, loss > accomplishments. That is to state that if a boxer loses, then the loss will always be a factor, even if they have greater accomplishments than undefeated boxers?
Comment
-
Originally posted by White Willy View PostLike, fighters who's careers I've seen unfolding. Lived through their eras. I don't think I've ever seen anyone as good. Roy Jones Jr. and Prince Naseem had that untouchable vibe in their primes. But Lomachenko is on another level.Originally posted by LacedUp View PostHe's definitely one of the best I've ever seen too. The footwork, the angles.. It's insane to watch him every time.
Comment
-
Comment