Originally posted by soul_survivor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rigo was too small... period.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Shape up View PostSo skill was the difference, how much did plaster hands outweigh Pacquiao by, who won, how much did canelo outweigh fluid by, who won, how many people were picking rigo to win, plenty, so tell me how he imposed his size and weight because you've failed, he didn't lean on him, he didn't muscle his way in, he didn't take a punch to land one, he didn't force him into the corner and unload so tell me exactly where he won throwing his pity, patter punches, did rigo look hurt, did rigo have any marks on his face, maybe if rigo threw some punches he might have had a chanceOriginally posted by Ganstaz003 View PostIf person A has an AK-47 in their back back during a battle against person B who only wields a knife but suppose person A refuses to use their AK-47 at all and relies on only using their knife too. Can you honestly claim that the reason why person A won the battle (assuming they do) was because of their AK-47, despite them not even using it? Are you going to claim that the 'confidence' and 'weaponry presence' that comes from having an AK-47 doesn't disappear? Like that's relevant at all?
If Lomachenko was confident in his physical advantage but didn't use it at all, then you can't attribute his win to his physical advantage.
Also, have you got any evidence Donaire was that weight during fight night against Rigo? Last time I checked, Donaire didn't have any rehydration clauses (allowing him to rehydrate to whatever he liked) whilst Lomachenko had a rehydration clause up to 138 pounds.
Great points guys. I thought all this was clear as day, many said before the fight size wouldn't be a factor and i thought that was 100 percent plain as day to anyone who follows the sport watching.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
Size doesn't matter though.
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostSize isn't just a weapon it offers protection also. The ability to take a punch better if you're caught, that gives you confidence to attack.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RyanjLarose View Postdude ....you don't see how wide rigos stance is there and how upright loma is ...why are you arguing this dumb point so much its unreal lol
ya and was loma caught tho? barely ...why worry about being caught when you have nothing even coming back at you ? you're points are hilarious ,its like arguing with someone on the comments of a political post on facebook...just totally dead in side and close minded its fascinating to read
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostIt's not my fault you're so blinded you can't see common sense that has been known for over a century in boxing. Size matters. Loma himself said it. But he, history and everyone is wrong apart from Lomachenko ****riders.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View PostIt's not my fault you're so blinded you can't see common sense that has been known for over a century in boxing. Size matters. Loma himself said it. But he, history and everyone is wrong apart from Lomachenko ****riders.
2 questions
how much money did you lose betting on rigo?
how much of it are you going to get back arguing on the Internet to try and cancel out the win?
Comment
-
Comment