Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury UKAD Hearing Starts Monday, Facing 4 Year Ban

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    How come Hughie is allowed to fight and Tyson isn't?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER View Post
      Google

      The world heavyweight boxing champion Tyson Fury is suing Britain’s anti-doping and boxing authorities over allegations he used a performance-enhancing drug.

      Fury, 27, was charged with a doping offence by UK Anti-Doping on 24 June after a urine sample taken in February 2015 – nine months before he beat Wladimir Klitschko to win his world titles – showed traces of the banned substance nandrolone.
      Traces so any amount of nandrolone is a bannable offence?

      And could you legitimately get traces from meat?

      And why has the hearing taken so long to take place?

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by ScottWeiland View Post
        You know exactly what I’m talking about. Fury using steroids.
        ScottWeiland - judge, jury and executioner.

        No need for a hearing, Weiland doesn't like gypsies so Fury is guilty.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by jas View Post
          Traces so any amount of nandrolone is a bannable offence?

          And could you legitimately get traces from meat?

          And why has the hearing taken so long to take place?
          Yes, tests have established that contaminants sometimes found in meat and legal protein supplements can cause traces of nandrolone in urine samples

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by kafkod View Post
            ScottWeiland - judge, jury and executioner.

            No need for a hearing, Weiland doesn't like gypsies so Fury is guilty.
            I don’t like dishonest cheats, someone has to and I’ll leave that to you. You also happen to be a fan of the father and uncle too right ? Do we even need to hear their story again ?

            Tell us again why the hearing keeps being delayed ?

            You’re serious loser when it comes to discussing Furry and GGG to the point it’s absolutely pointless and fruitless as you’re so biased. Have you ever actually considered that he tested positive because he actually had the steroids in his body ? Hell, it’s a bit of a stretch to deny it when a guy in his stable flagged too. These are two cousins famed for their lack of power, how many stoppages does Tyson Fury actually have that were actual KO’s and not technical stoppages ? Taking aside the Cunningham KO are you aware the last actual KO Fury had ?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by TheBigLug View Post
              Speak out against zionists or upset the gay community when the whole media is full of fudge packers and this is what happens.

              All sorts of things at work and people being influence to destroy his career. He was technically never even found guilty. Actual guilty fighters have served suspensions and fought again while his case his still ongoing.

              Even if he was guilty, it should have been dealt with already but they've been hellbent on keeping him out of the game.
              Got banned for saying something along these lines last year

              True though . Media is run by the guys with long side burns if you diss them your out p

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                Yes, tests have established that contaminants sometimes found in meat and legal protein supplements can cause traces of nandrolone in urine samples
                Ukad could get sued for tons of money

                Thing is fury also had a failed test when he told the testers to f off when they showed up at the gym. Ill find the article and bump it.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Randall Cunning View Post
                  Itll get backdated to the time of the offence, so most he'll be out for another year. I think he'll get a 2-3 year ban, back dated, and free to continue fighting. Doubt UKAD want to go to court. Fury probably knows he'll be free soon, why hes started making an effort to get in shape.
                  Backdated? Fury isn't even banned atm and hasn't been since the first few months the news broke. He had his license taken for his claims of mental health issues. He hasn't applied for it back.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    How come Hughie is allowed to fight and Tyson isn't?
                    Neither Fury is banned at the moment. Tyson had his license taken for claiming to be mentally ill. He hasn't chosen to apply for it back.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by jas View Post
                      Ukad could get sued for tons of money

                      Thing is fury also had a failed test when he told the testers to f off when they showed up at the gym. Ill find the article and bump it.
                      I know about that, and that refusal to provide a sample can be counted as a failed test. Fury was also being tested by VADA at that time though, and the only thing he came up positive for was *******. He was also suffering from the mental health problems that led to him losing his licence, so that will have to be taken into account.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP