Originally posted by New England
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WAs Marquez PAC-1 “Robbery” Schooling or Justified Draw?
Collapse
-
I had Pacquiao winning the fight. Close fight though, all the first 3 were IMO. They were the kind of fights were no result is a robbery.
JMM did brilliantly to fight his way back into the fight.
I feel Pacquiao can feel the more aggrieved though with the draw, since a mistake by one of the judges cost him an official win.
Comment
-
Two totally different fights but I scored the Pacquaio-Marquez 1 fight a draw.
Marquez did amazing to come back from that first round.
Comment
-
In a much as this pains me I agree with judges for ALL 3 fights.Seen them 2-0-1 for Pac.2nd by a point(kn)3rd by 2.Funny thing is most people say JM should have got #3 but if you look at punch stats(which don't mean everything)#3 was only fight out of 1st 3 that Pac outlanded him total and in powershots.Other 2 JM had lead in those stats but had 4 kn total to overcome.
Comment
-
There is a revisionist narrative that from the start of the 2nd round, Marquez all then sweeped till the end of the fight which is not the case. Pacquiao was still landing hard shots, rocking Marquez even but with Marquez's counter punching he just landed more in the rounds but it was by all means not a schooling that people projected it off, they should watch the fight again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostIt's amazing how you bring GGG into everything. I thought the fight was very close between these two great fighters. I think a draw was justified.
What does scoring have to do with GGG u dimwit
Everything revolves around GGg for u you soft gimp. I used to date Byrd. When badass. And Nelo got years to stay. Don’t you want to see the rematch in Nelo kicking teeing off his face again? Hence the DRAW and scoring PAC vs Marquez
Comment
Comment