who has stiverne actually beat?

[sotgoda]

Thanks for confirming my original post. All sound and logical reasoning goes out of the window with you because it contradicts what is written on a rankings sheet.

The Klitschko that AJ beat is and always will be better than the stiverne wilder beat first time round.

That klitschko was better than the klitschko rated #1 on your bull**** list when stiverne was rated #3.

If you cant grow balls and admit that, purely because it isnt written in any of your almighty rankings.. then you arent a fan of boxing...youre just an **** "fact" spewer who cares more about the feeling of being "right" than of the health of the sport you say youre a fan of.

Also.. and because i have a right to my opinion.. my opinion is youre still a twat.

Pathetic post by a delusional AJ fanatic. Klitschko was at least 3 years away from peak when he fought AJ. He was struggling putting the likes of Pulev and Povetkin away, and was terrible against Bryant Jennings. You want to hype up AJ's win but there was nothing special about it. Wlad also was not a champion anymore, was past 41 years and was coming off a loss - all the more reasons why AJ took the fight. Low to medium risk - high reward provided he won - which AJ did.

[satiev1]

I hear people saying oh yeah stiverne was a legit win, yeah wilders fought bums but he proved himself against stiverne. what actually elevates him above any of the other bums on wilders CV? He was highly ranked, so what? Cause governing body rankings are so reliable lol. From what i see, all hes beaten is chris arreola, wow, is that the acid test at heavyweight or something, beating arreola? I never thought much of him beating stiverne a few years back, yet alone bombing him out now when hes a big fat sloppy 39 year old coming in on short notice. I guess that proves wilders the best heavyweight around though!!! No chance joshua could have done that to such quality opposition.

Wilder beat a guy who took the fight on 2 week notice and was out for 2 years. Can't make this **** up.

[juggernaut666]

he called everyone on the board anti Semites i remember for saying something bad about arum.

Rumor has it original zero is max kellerman

Max Kellerman isnt a subtle Wilder fanboy in disguise ,theres a group of THOSE ppl too on here scattered around . lol

[katjack]

Stiverne proved he was tough the first fight with Wilder.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Didn't you do one of these threads when the bodyguard lost to Ward ? Stiverne I a nobody, nobody has dealt with him like that before though.

Like it or not Wilder is a danger to Joshua.

[daggum]

Didn't you do one of these threads when the bodyguard lost to Ward ? Stiverne I a nobody, nobody has dealt with him like that before though.

Like it or not Wilder is a danger to Joshua.

stirvernes never been 39, had one fight in 3 years, been such a fat slob, and took the fight on short notice before either. prime stirverne got a draw with 17-17 fighter as well as beign ko'd by a nobody. yeah he beat arreola but arreola ******. he lost to a lightheavy.

[LetOutTheCage]

Takam is light years better than fat **** Stiverne.....

Yeah he is, Wilder's best win wouldnt even be in AJ's top 4 wins, pretty telling.

[LacedUp]

No, he wasn't.

http://www.tbrb.org/2017/05/15/11-april-2017/

Yes he was - With ring and everyone else. Trbr removes a fighter after a year of inactivity, which in this case wasn't Klitschko's fault.

It had nothing to do with him losing to Fury.

http://www.tbrb.org/2016/10/30/11-october-2016/

[LacedUp]

Pathetic post by a delusional AJ fanatic. Klitschko was at least 3 years away from peak when he fought AJ. He was struggling putting the likes of Pulev and Povetkin away, and was terrible against Bryant Jennings. You want to hype up AJ's win but there was nothing special about it. Wlad also was not a champion anymore, was past 41 years and was coming off a loss - all the more reasons why AJ took the fight. Low to medium risk - high reward provided he won - which AJ did.

is this idiot trying to say Wladimir Klitschko wouldn't be the best guy on Wilder's resume?

Take a seat.

[daggum]

i'm going to break down stirverns meteoric rise to the top...

before stirverne and arreola met in their 2 superfights they were ranked...

stirverne was unranked
arreola was ranked #9

afte their superfights stirverne moved up to #2 in the rankings...

that seems pretty dubious to me especially when compared to the resume of others below him like...

tyson fury: had beat chisora twice, kevin johnson, and cunningham(my opinion should have been higher ranked)

pulev: had beat dimitrenko, undefeated ustinov, and tony thompson(my opinoin should have been ranked higher) but lost to klitschko(losing to good fighters shouldnt auto-drop you below unproven people)

bryant jennings: had beaten fedesov, undefeated spilzka, and undefeated perez(my opinion should have been ranked higher)

glazkov: coming off a win over #3 ranked adamek. why is stirverne ranked higher cause he beat the #9 guy twice??? (my opinion should have been ranked higher)


so from what i can tell he was severely overranked. the main reason he was ranked so high seems to be because he held a belt.