Comments Thread For: Wilder: I'll Fight Whyte - If Contract Guarantees Joshua is Next!

[SchoolTheseCats]

But you can also say Wilder isnt confident he can beat Whyte and still wants the Joshua payday if he does get beat. Theres 2 ways to look at this and Id doubt Hearn would want to commit to a fight between Joshua and someone Whyte just beat

Did you read the article? If wilder loses he don’t get aj next fool it’s only if he win

[thack]

D.Wilder is the WBC Champ so then why is there no D.Wilder vs AJ fight next instead of Whyte?

Wilder to date is not marquee even in the states.A.J. is.

Wilder is more exciting than the other champ , Parker(not difficult!).

Hearn is getting carried away by his own greed but he has a point. Make Wilder more of a name and beat Whyte in the uk and set it up......NEXT!

[SchoolTheseCats]

Do some background on the IBF's requirements for AJ, and that'll answer your question.

Takam is Ibf mando after this fight Joshua free to fight whoever next with the wba suspending Ortiz that mando is no longer due

[Outwest Exp 355]

Far from it. Idiots blindly go along believing any old nonsense that come out of these guys mouths, and thats from both sides. Who ever agreed to a demand like this before? Anything can happen, especially with heavyweights

But you trust a snake like Hearn though? Hearn is the one with the history of contradicting himself time and time again not Wilder. So you tell me who should I believe?

[kafkod]

Stiverne > White

Whyte is a security guard!!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Stiffern is an overweight 40 yo journeyman who got decked by Derric Rossy in his last fight.

[SchoolTheseCats]

Wilder to date is not marquee even in the states.A.J. is.

Wilder is more exciting than the other champ , Parker(not difficult!).

Hearn is getting carried away by his own greed but he has a point. Make Wilder more of a name and beat Whyte in the uk and set it up......NEXT!

The fight would sellout regardless no need to have a pointless fight with Whyte next but if it guarantees him aj next so be it, **** Breazeale fight with aj was a sellout so I don’t get the build u.k interest and all that

[Rip Chudd]

The fight would sellout regardless no need to have a pointless fight with Whyte next but if it guarantees him aj next so be it, **** Breazeale fight with aj was a sellout so I don’t get the build u.k interest and all that

People using it as an excuse

[Randall Cunning]

But you trust a snake like Hearn though? Hearn is the one with the history of contradicting himself time and time again not Wilder. So you tell me who should I believe?

I dont believe any of it til it happens, Hearn aswell, its just posturing, and especially when theyve both got fights coming up. Running up to fights is **** talking season.

I believe the fight will happen at the end of the year in Vegas

[Vinnykin]

I don't see how they could guarantee a fight before the negotiations, networks, splits for said fight after are sorted?

Has this ever been done before? They would have to sort out the splits for Joshua fight but how do you guarantee Wilder a split and then he looks like **** in the fight, or it's not a good fight it and it devalues him....or it ends in a draw? Or Whyte gets injured in the first round etc etc

This is what people have to realise. Hearn has promised on camera that if he beats Whyte they will negotiate the Joshua fight, that should be enough. And I'll be the first erson on here to turn on him and AJ if he were to renege on that promise.

[RedPath]

"If Eddie Hearn wants me to fight Dillian Whyte, I have no problem smashing Dillian Whyte but make sure, when you have that contract, you add Anthony Joshua, because I am going to come and knock down that kingdom that I helped build up."

Just to be crystal clear then, as he will have "no problem smashing Dillian Whyte" he won’t mind the formality of a contract stipulation that reads something like: "the winner of the Dillian Whyte vs Deontay Wilder fight will face Anthony Joshua".

I'm sure he didn’t mean that he expects to face AJ if (heaven forbid!) he should lose to Whyte, right?