Comments Thread For: Hearn: Jacobs Beat Golovkin, He Should Already Be a Superstar!

[daggum]

yea and puerto rico is goind just fine! keep saying it, it might come true

[Kigali]

I know you have trouble with numbers but jacobs looked like a dried out LH when he lost to the small old slow no defense GGG. remember dems voters are peasants who don't speak English and low IQ city dwellers and YOU hahahahahah

I thought you said he was a CW....now he was a LH.

You backtrack just like a white racist.....except you're not white.


You aren't even registered to vote

[ruedboy]

What makes you think Lemieux or Saunders would fight him???

Fighters need to fight? lol

[robbyheartbaby]

What a surprise, a promoter believing his fighter won a fight he clearly lost. Imagine the outrage if they had given that decision to Jacobs. Keen to see what he does against this bum.

[bluemax]

So in the history of boxing, no fighter has been knocked down and got up to win the title?

Of coarse you can but in this fight the bigger guy fought like a scraed smaller guy in a lot of rounds. Jacobs clearly lost this fight and the knockdown just sealed his fate. I'd love to see a Canelo vs Jacobs fight though they can advertise it as two of the best fighters ever to be beat by GGG.

[BrometheusBob.]

Hearn casually triggered half of NSB

[theface07]

I agree Jacobs beat Golovkin but unfortunately because of politics and the fact that he was knocked down it would have been hard for him to get the decision.

Jacobs lost to Golovkin because of politics AND the fact that he was knocked down? Come on now. Take the politics part out of it and you have the real reason he lost. Politics is the reason why it took GGG so long to get someone as good as Jacobs in the ring.
I think it was close as hell but 6-6 with an extra point for Golovkin is as close as Jacobs got. It was more competitive than Golovkin/Canelo which was 8-4, 7-5 or 7-4 and one round even.
I watched both fights multiple times in an attempt to give Jacobs and Canelo as many rounds as possible. I also happen to be a fan of all three fighters so don't even start with the Lil G nut hugger BS.

[theface07]

So in the history of boxing, no fighter has been knocked down and got up to win the title?

Right you are. Even though it was controversial, first thing that came to my mind was Dempsey vs Tunney and the famous long count. How about Tyson vs Douglas?

[theface07]

What makes you think Lemieux or Saunders would fight him???

I don't see any reason why Lemieux wouldn't fight him. It would be a decent payday and a chance for Lemieux to prove he's still near the upper echelon of middleweights. He hasn't ducked a challenge before to my knowledge.
Saunders on the other hand is scared of his own shadow. He is skeptical of his own abilities and doesn't want to lose his 0 and also potentially get KO'd.

[theface07]

Bla, bla, bla, Jacobs needs to get back in the ring and stop dining out on his loss to Golovkin. This is the same stuff we heard from "Get The Towel Ready" Brook. lol

Stop laughing at your own pathetic attempt at being funny. The aftermath of Brook vs GGG and Jacobs vs GGG is not even remotely the same. Brook was a welterweight moving up to fight the best middleweight on the planet. What would you prefer the corner do if someone broke your eye socket? Let you hang around and take more permanent damage? I'll bet you're a genuine coward in real life.