Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC May Create New Division, Split Heavyweight Class in Two

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by NEETzsche View Post
    They could still move up and challenge the super heavies, there'd just be one more pit stop along the way. In fact Byrd might have received far more respect if he'd had a division more suited to him that he could actually rule over for a while
    Except they'd have to add bulk and why? There have always been BIG heavyweights. It's only recently they've dominated and then it was The Who (Lewis, Klits) more than the size. Cunningham gave Fury a tougher go than Wlad because what he did matched against that sheer size even in a loss.

    There should never be a pro class above heavyweight.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Pandur View Post
      I would honestly consider walking away from the sport as a fan.

      This is just disgusting.
      Dont walk away. Just dont watch WBC Championship fights.

      WBC is becoming thw WORST of all the belts.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by crold1 View Post
        Except they'd have to add bulk and why? There have always been BIG heavyweights. It's only recently they've dominated and then it was The Who (Lewis, Klits) more than the size. Cunningham gave Fury a tougher go than Wlad because what he did matched against that sheer size even in a loss.

        There should never be a pro class above heavyweight.
        Fury fought Cunningham differently than he did Klitschko. It's like citing Brook's little successes against Golovkin as a reason to get rid of the weight classes between them. The average size of an elite heavy has been rising and rising for a while now. Smaller guys might occasionally be able to beat a bigger guy but nowadays they are the anomalies and 250 lb juggernauts are the standard. It's probably due to drugs but I don't know what can be done to completely eradicate that

        We can keep calling the open weight division "heavyweight" and find some other name for the new one below it. How is it fair that every other division is separated by like 5% or less but light heavies have to add about 15% body mass when they move up and cruisers moving to heavy and small heavies will routinely have to face guys like 25% bigger than them

        Comment


        • #24
          No. Just no.

          The WBC would be crapping on the entire history of the most storied division in the sport.

          Comment


          • #25
            Humans have been getting taller and taller, the average height of men has increased 4 inches over the past 100 years and people are also getting a lot heavier. It only makes sense to add another division if the huge heavies are so dominant and the littler ones are at a huge disadvantage. Think about it, lenox lewis, the klitschko brothers, anthony joshua, tyson Fury, deontay wilder have been the most dominant heavyweights since the new millenium and the smaller guys didnt have a chance in hell. I think it only makes sense to add a division so the smaller heavies can compete and fight guys their own size instead of having an 8 inch height reach and a 40 lb weight disadvantage.

            Comment


            • #26
              more bs from sanctioning bodies. I don't know what's worse, the WBC or the WBA with their 4 champions in each weight class

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by jjsmyth87 View Post
                Humans have been getting taller and taller, the average height of men has increased 4 inches over the past 100 years and people are also getting a lot heavier. It only makes sense to add another division if the huge heavies are so dominant and the littler ones are at a huge disadvantage. Think about it, lenox lewis, the klitschko brothers, anthony joshua, tyson Fury, deontay wilder have been the most dominant heavyweights since the new millenium and the smaller guys didnt have a chance in hell. I think it only makes sense to add a division so the smaller heavies can compete and fight guys their own size instead of having an 8 inch height reach and a 40 lb weight disadvantage.
                Brewster and Rahman ko'd Klitchsko and Lewis who were both bigger men.

                Comment


                • #28
                  This is long overdo . The HW boxing criteria and standard is far out dated where HW 's on avg are 240 . The starting point should be about 227 and over . This will create a actual relevant weight class bc no one really fight below 220 at HW ,this is common sense . People have to understand its not 1940's anymore .
                  Last edited by juggernaut666; 10-06-2017, 06:59 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by buddyr View Post
                    Brewster and Rahman ko'd Klitchsko and Lewis who were both bigger men.
                    True but your talking about lucky punches that anyone can land. They both went on to have lackluster careers while klitschko and lewis are top 10 heavyweights of all time.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Terrible idea. The last thing boxing needs is another weight division.

                      Might as well add another alphabet title while we're at it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP