Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    OH? I AM WRONG? TELL WADA THAT THEY ARE WRONG ABOUT THEIR OWN RULES, ADP02



    UNLESS REQUIRED HAS A DIFFERENT MEANING TODAY THAN IT HAD YESTERDAY, I THINK THIS MEANS THAT YOU ARE WRONG!!!!!!!

    Killed you with one line. Now Let's hear you tell WADA they are wrong ABOUT THE WADA CODE!!!
    Well, you are WRONG!!!

    OR until the DCO determines that there are exceptional circumstances which mean that for logistical reasons it is impossible to continue with the Sample Collection Session. Such exceptional circumstances shall be documented accordingly by the DCO.

    and what we were discussing was a partial sample

    That too YOU were WRONG!!!


    With 2 statements, I corrected you in your post and gave you 2 scenarios where you were WRONG!!!





    YOU ARE SO WRONG!!!





    To get a RETRO BS TUE, it needs to be for an emergency type medical situation. Right? unless (exceptional circumstances)? But here, you cannot accept the above statement. Typical Floyd fan!!!





    .
    Last edited by ADP02; 11-21-2017, 08:36 AM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      You are wrong idiot. Once again, THE DCO IS REQUIRED TO TAKE THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY!!!

      We went thru this before. Men in South Korea are REQUIRED to serve in the military. If someone is deemed unfit and therefore doesn’t go, does that make it less of a requirement?

      You ducked that.

      Your example is beyond idiotic you moron. YOUR QUOTATION IS FOR A CONTAMINATED SAMPLE YOU DUCKING DEFLECTING BUTTHURT BlTCH!!!! Why the **** would you be talking about a contaminated partial sample when you know he gave two partial samples to make it a full sample???? Lmao. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU, you moron. And you already know THEY STAY UNTIL THEY GET A SUITABLE SAMPLE.

      You're living in a fairytale world if you believe an athlete gives a partial sample that happens to be contaminated, and then there are suddenly no uncontaminated vessels left to urine in unless the athlete is HELD TO BE IN VIOLATION or THE ANTI-DOPING ORGANIZATION IS FOUND TO BE INCOMPETENT BY WADA!!!! LET ME REMIND YOU THAT ALL OF THIS WOULD HAVE TO BE RECORDED BY THE DCO, SENT TO WADA, UPLOADED TO ADAMS, AND SENT TO THE LABS. . I'm tired of kicking the shlt out of you because everyone can see now what a shlt poster you are!

      ONLY YOU WOULD STATE THAT MAYWEATHER GAVE A PARTIAL SAMPLE, CONTAMINATED IT IN FRONT OF THE DCO, CONTAMINATED ALL OF THE VESSELS SO THAT HE HAD NO MORE VESSELS TO PUT THE URINE IN, AND THUS WAS ONLY TESTED ON A CONTAMINATED PARTIAL SAMPLE.


      YOU ARE BY FAR THE BIGGEST IDIOT AROUND. THANKS FOR EMBARRASSING YOURSELF YET AGAIN. I KNEW YOU WOULDNT LET ME DOWN. AND THATS WHY YOU AVOIDED GIVING ME THAT LINK ISNT IT???? LMAOOOO. YOU LEFT OUT THE PART ABOUT REQUIRING ANOTHER SAMPLE AS WELL!!!!!!! YOU’RE A PIECE OF SHlT AND DID EXACTLY WHAT DOSUMPTHIN SAID YOU WOULD DO. LMAOOOOO!!!!!


      COME ON. TELL US THAT THERE WAS NO SPG TAKEN BECAUSE HE GAVE A CONTAMINATED SAMPLE AND THEN THREW ALL OF THE CONTAINERS ON THE GROUND, THIS WAS NOTED BY THE DCO AND SENT TO USADA, WADA, AND THE LABS!!!! THAT'S A GOOD THEORY!!!


      COME ON. TELL US THIS IS YOUR THEORY. I WANT TO PUT IT IN MY SIG!

      Do not tell me that you brought up the military in South Korea? Let's see .... Yup you did!!! So they too are using WADA?


      If you read the document, it's for partial samples as well. I'm pretty sure that I provided that information to you previously.

      For the rest, see my previous email. Typical die hard FLoyd fan ..... Cannot accept ...




      .

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post


        To get a RETRO BS TUE, it needs to be for an emergency type medical situation. Right? unless (exceptional circumstances)? But here, you cannot accept the above statement. Typical Floyd fan!!!




        .
        FAIL

        Ahhh, no. WRONG!!!!!

        There are 4 situations which allow you to apply for a retroactive TUE, not 2.

        Emergency is just one of them.

        Exceptional circumstances is just one of them.

        "Applicable rules" and "Fairness, determined by the ADO" are the other two.

        You only need to satisfy one of them to be able to apply for a retroactive TUE.

        From what I gather, Floyd fit at least 3 and possibly all 4.

        But, he only needed to satisfy 1.

        Which is why debates about whether he was severely dehydrated or whether he was in an emergency status might be fun, but they are also MOOT.

        They are irrelevant as long as Floyd satisfied one of the other 2 situations.

        Satisfy just one of the 4 and you can apply for a retroactive TUE.

        So it doesn't matter how dehydrated Floyd was.

        It doesn't matter how much of an emergency it was as long as not doing something would adversely affect the athlete.

        I covered this in post #1654 and Travestyny expanded on it in post #1812.


        Thanks for playing, butthurts.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          DEFLECTION means that I posted something that you never actually answered to and then you moved onto something that is irrelevant.

          You know, like if we were discussing IVs before Hauser's report. Like I said, who cares when this came up and I explained why.


          but I also stated that there were discussions that came up. It's a couple of years ago and many people posted but like I said, so what!
          typical kool... still avoiding why he called me a monkey boy, yet he wants me to answer his question that had nothing to do with me LOL.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
            typical kool... still avoiding why he called me a monkey boy, yet he wants me to answer his question that had nothing to do with me LOL.
            FAIL

            With me calling you CisternChimp, do you really need a map to understand how you got to monkey-boy?

            Oh yeah, I forgot.

            You are actually THAT ******.

            And BTW, what you lack in intellect you more than make up for with unabashed, shytgrinning temerity.

            You are in here asking why I didn't answer a question while completely avoiding one I asked you prior to that.

            Here ya go.

            DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
              FAIL

              With me calling you CisternChimp, do you really need a map to understand how you got to monkey-boy?

              Oh yeah, I forgot.

              You are actually THAT ******.

              And BTW, what you lack in intellect you more than make up for with unabashed, shytgrinning temerity.

              You are in here asking why I didn't answer a question while completely avoiding one I asked you prior to that.

              Here ya go.

              DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY IN MAY 2015 WHEN KEVIN IOLE REPORTED THE IVs AND THE RETROACTIVE TUE?
              why the name calling when it had nothing to do with you? showing travesty traits is all im saying.

              i already answered your question last week, and look at you trying to deflect this by saying you asked me a question and i wouldnt answer so why should you answer mines?

              because your question had nothing to do with me at hand! where as with you, what im asking you, it actually came from you! let that sink in einstein!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                Well, you are WRONG!!!




                and what we were discussing was a partial sample

                That too YOU were WRONG!!!


                With 2 statements, I corrected you in your post and gave you 2 scenarios where you were WRONG!!!





                YOU ARE SO WRONG!!!





                To get a RETRO BS TUE, it needs to be for an emergency type medical situation. Right? unless (exceptional circumstances)? But here, you cannot accept the above statement. Typical Floyd fan!!!

                .

                STOP SAYING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND ACCEPT YOUR FATE, YOU IDIOT.

                1. Exceptional circumstances for logistical reasons, you fool. Logistical reasons that would make it IMPOSSIBLE to continue. The collection vessels are pre-packaged by the ****ing company, tested, and come in tamper proof packaging. Your desperation is hysterical.

                2. Your quotation is not just about partial samples you idiot. Your quotation is about CONTAMINATED OR UNSUITABLE PARTIAL SAMPLES. That's why you are a complete idiot.

                You now want to say it's about all partial samples, but you know that you're trying to be a deceitful f@g. You posted this!

                NOTE: When pouring urine into the A and B bottles the DCO will instruct the Athlete to leave a residual amount (<2ml) in the collection vessel. The DCO should not perform specific gravity testing on a partial sample. In this case, the measurements should only be done after the combined amount of urine meets the minimum volume requirements and has been sealed in the A and B bottles.

                You put the bolded in big letters......and you ignored what's in red! LMAOOOO. Dude, you're not going to fool us! We already know that you're a little bltch. You try to hide information ALL THE TIME. It's not going to work. We know to check into everything that you say now!!!!

                Oh, and do you want more?????

                7.4.5 In conducting the Sample Collection Session, the following information shall be recorded as a minimum:

                * p) *Required laboratory information on the Sample (i.e., for a urine 
Sample, its volume and specific gravity measurement); 


                * https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...nuary_2017.pdf

                OH....WHAT'S THAT YOU SAY? THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY IS REQUIRED?????? BUT BUT BUT....IF IT'S A PARTIAL SAMPLE WE JUST LEAVE IT THERE....BECAUSE WE SUDDENLY HAVE NO MORE COLLECTION VESSELS AND THERE IS A PIECE OF SHlT FLOATING IN IT. YEA THAT'S RIGHT. THE DCO WROTE DOWN THAT THE ATHLETE THREW ALL THE CONTAINERS ON THE FLOOR AND PUT A LITERAL PIECE OF SHlT IN HIS PARTIAL SAMPLE. BUT THEY JUST LET HIM SLIDE FOR THAT. NO ONE NEEDS TO NOTICE OR CARE!


                GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOU IDIOT!!!! THE ONLY THING YOU ARE GOOD FOR IS A LAUGH AND BEING WRONGGGGGG!!!!


                I TOLD YOU. PERMANENT BAN! LET'S SEE YOU STEP UP AND PROOVE THAT THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY ISN'T REQUIRED....IN THE FACE OF WADA WHO SAYS THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY IS REQUIRED!!!! LMAOOOOOOO!

                STEP UP YOU LITTLE BlTCH!

                [img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

                Comment


                • my biiatch travesty still up to his old ways challenging posters on an account ban when he hasnt even own up to his.

                  tryna play dumb talking about "i didnt know you were challenging me in this thread about the OT".. yeah like i didnt come into this thread talking about it!!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    Do not tell me that you brought up the military in South Korea? Let's see .... Yup you did!!! So they too are using WADA?


                    If you read the document, it's for partial samples as well. I'm pretty sure that I provided that information to you previously.

                    For the rest, see my previous email. Typical die hard FLoyd fan ..... Cannot accept ...




                    .
                    DUDE, YOU BOUGHT UP YOUR SON SWIMMING IN A KIDDY POOL, COMPARED YOURSELF TO WORLD CLASS ATHLETES WHEN YOU RIDE YOUR BIKE ON THE WEEKEND, AND TALKED ABOUT YOUR COUSIN'S CHEMISTRY CLASS WHEN WE DEBATED ABOUT EPO TESTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


                    REALLY? YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO TALK ABOUT ANYTHING????

                    I'M TRYING TO TEACH YOUR DUMB ASS WHAT A REQUIREMENT IS. A REQUIREMENT IS NECESSARY....BUT IF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, HOW CAN YOU FOLLOW THROUGH? AGAIN, THE SAMPLE MUST PASS THE SPECIFIC GRAVITY UNLESS IT BECOMES IMPOSSIBLE! WHAT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE MUST BE DOCUMENTED AND SENT TO THE LAB, WADA, AND UPLOADED TO ADAMS.

                    AND WHAT WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE? OH THAT'S RIGHT. THE PRE-PACKAGED AND CHECKED COLLECTION VESSELS WOULD BE ALL CONTAMINATED AND NO ONE WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO BRING MORE. THEY COME IN A ****ING STYROFOAM OR CARDBOARD BOX THAT IS TAMPER EVIDENT, INSIDE THE BOTTLES ARE ALL INDIVIDUALLY WRAPPED WITH TAMPER EVIDENT WRAPPING, THE FACTORY GUARANTEES THEY ARE CLEAN AND READY FOR ANTI-DOPING PURPOSES...BUT NOW ADP02 IS TRYING TO TELL US THAT ALL OF THEM ARE ****ED UP!!!!!!!! THAT'S RIGHT. NONE LEFT.


                    YOU ARE BEING EMBARRASSED AND TAKING A BEATING WORSE THAN YOU TOOK IN OUR THUNDERDOME BATTLE. TELL US MORE. YOU ALREADY HAVE 3 POSTERS BEATING THE **** OUT OF YOU. I HOPE MORE SEE YOUR BULLSHlT AND CONTINUE TO KICK THE **** OUT OF YOU WHILE YOU ARE DOWN

                    LET'S DO A LITTLE CHECK:

                    1. YOU WERE WRONG ABOUT SALAZAR MANIPULATING TUES. You have NO EVIDENCE at all and won't step up to the challenge about it. Your evidence is the word of one witness who was proven wrong! You never provided another witness that said anything about Salazar's TUE's. Salazar shows proof and you can't handle it. 4 TUEs since 2011 and USADA never challenges him.

                    2. You then claim that I said Salazar gave legit infusions that were <50ml. WRONG! You become rattled when I show you that clearly my post says "infusions via small injections less than 50ml" and you refuse your own challenge because you know you are WRONG!

                    3. You say that the DCO can possibly not take the Specific Gravity of a sample, which WADA says numerous times is a requirement, you try to shift this to a partial sample even knowing that they take the SPG once it becomes a full sample, and you try to shift this to a contaminated or unsuitable partial sample, knowing that you took this from the ****ing section that says "WHEN AN ADDITIONAL SAMPLE SHOULD BE GIVEN." LMAOOO!!!!!! WRONG!

                    4. You say the SPG isn't taken if the athlete passes the minimum required 90ml. How can you be such a moron? WRONG!

                    5. You said Mayweather tapers off before testing begins, and goes right back on once testing begins!!!! THIS MAKES NO SENSE!!!! WRONG!

                    6. You said Mayweather can keep his HT level perpetually higher than normal over 2 months. Shouldn't he have enough holes in him to look like a heroin addict? Then why is it you that comes across as the junkie, idiot??? WRONG!!!


                    Dude, I can go on and on. Shut the **** up already. You've murdered yourself, clown!
                    Last edited by travestyny; 11-21-2017, 01:21 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
                      my biiatch travesty still up to his old ways challenging posters on an account ban when he hasnt even own up to his.

                      tryna play dumb talking about "i didnt know you were challenging me in this thread about the OT".. yeah like i didnt come into this thread talking about it!!
                      SHUT YOUR DUMB ASS UP AND CONTINUE YOUR BAN. YOU STILL HAVE 4 DAYS YOU LITTLE PIECE OF SHlT.

                      BUT I DO APPRECIATE YOU CONSTANTLY REMINDING ME THAT I RUINED YOUR LIFE. LMAOOOOOO. Jesus Christ you are a moron. Get my nuts off ya chin already!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP