Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shape up
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 3123
    • 64
    • 0
    • 35,399

    #1621
    notice in the above post that it says that they will be the anti doping rules for ALL PURPOSES, NOW THINK ABOUT ALL PURPOSES, That means for everything, so that is substantive change loser

    Comment

    • Shape up
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2016
      • 3123
      • 64
      • 0
      • 35,399

      #1622
      Originally posted by travestyny
      I guess you don’t see where it says procedural RULES.

      YOU LOSE.
      Already covered that with, ALL PURPOSES sucker

      Comment

      • travestyny
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 29107
        • 4,962
        • 9,405
        • 4,074,546

        #1623
        Originally posted by Shape up
        notice in the above post that it says that they will be the anti doping rules for ALL PURPOSES, NOW THINK ABOUT ALL PURPOSES, That means for everything, so that is substantive change loser
        Why don’t you think about comprehending what that means.

        And while you are at it, think about what is said in section 5a of the USADA protocol which is specifically added to the contract.

        That ruins all of your bullshlt and you know it. You’re dismissed clown.

        Comment

        • travestyny
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 29107
          • 4,962
          • 9,405
          • 4,074,546

          #1624
          Originally posted by Shape up
          Already covered that with, ALL PURPOSES sucker
          What does Section 5a of the USADA Protocol say again?


          You lose.

          Comment

          • Shape up
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 3123
            • 64
            • 0
            • 35,399

            #1625
            Originally posted by travestyny
            What does Section 5a of the USADA Protocol say again?


            You lose.
            It says ******NY is a cokhead and has 3 alts

            Comment

            • Shape up
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2016
              • 3123
              • 64
              • 0
              • 35,399

              #1626
              And here is another rule they broke----- Appeal
              The athlete, USADA, WADA, or the international sport federation (IF) can appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). A decision delivered by CAS is final.

              Comment

              • travestyny
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 29107
                • 4,962
                • 9,405
                • 4,074,546

                #1627
                Originally posted by Shape up
                It says ******NY is a cokhead and has 3 alts
                As much dumb shlt as you’ve said here makes me seriously wonder if you are the crackhead.

                Let me say something with all seriousness.

                You are one of the ******est people I’ve ever met. It’s astonishing how dumb you are.

                I feel sorry for you.

                Comment

                • travestyny
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 29107
                  • 4,962
                  • 9,405
                  • 4,074,546

                  #1628
                  Originally posted by Shape up
                  And here is another rule they broke----- Appeal
                  The athlete, USADA, WADA, or the international sport federation (IF) can appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). A decision delivered by CAS is final.
                  From the Contract:

                  22. The decision of the single arbitrator identified in the paragraph above shall be final and binding, and there shall be no right of appeal except in the event of manifest error by the arbitrator with regard to his/her application of the relevant anti-doping rules to the facts of the case. An appeal of the arbitrator’s decision shall be submitted to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) in accordance with sections 17 (a)-(b) of the USADA Protocol. With the exception of the attorney’s fees of the respective Parties and subject to the CAS Panel’s Final Order, all costs and fees associated with the initiation and adjudication of the CAS appeal shall be borne entirely by the appellant. This provision shall survive termination of this Agreement.

                  LMAOOOOOO. HOW MANY TIMES ARE YOU GOING TO OWN YOURSELF. IT'S OVERRRRRRRR!!!! EAT A DlCK BlTCH!!!!

                  R.I.P.

                  Comment

                  • Shape up
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2016
                    • 3123
                    • 64
                    • 0
                    • 35,399

                    #1629
                    Originally posted by travestyny
                    As much dumb shlt as you’ve said here makes me seriously wonder if you are the crackhead.

                    Let me say something with all seriousness.

                    You are one of the ******est people I’ve ever met. It’s astonishing how dumb you are.

                    I feel sorry for you.
                    You should try and answer some questions instead of wondering so much, I have shown you a rule that says you cannot have an IV at home without a TUE in advance, floyd had an IV at home did he not, he didn't have a TUE in advance either, it clearly states in rule 4 that the only articles of code to be used for anti doping issues are the articles stated, rule 5 clearly states that the protocol sections mentioned will only be used for procedural results management, not for any anti doping policies, another rule broken, appeals, no right to appeal, you flo mos are drowning in sewerage

                    Comment

                    • travestyny
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 29107
                      • 4,962
                      • 9,405
                      • 4,074,546

                      #1630
                      Originally posted by Shape up
                      You should try and answer some questions instead of wondering so much, I have shown you a rule that says you cannot have an IV at home without a TUE in advance, floyd had an IV at home did he not, he didn't have a TUE in advance either, it clearly states in rule 4 that the only articles of code to be used for anti doping issues are the articles stated, rule 5 clearly states that the protocol sections mentioned will only be used for procedural results management, not for any anti doping policies, another rule broken, appeals, no right to appeal, you flo mos are drowning in sewerage
                      WRONG AND ALREADY PROVEN FALSE.


                      It's over bltch. You got nothing.

                      1. Learn what retroactive means.
                      2. Stop ducking section 5 of the USADA Protocol.
                      3. Look at the contract about appeals.


                      [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/l4Ki2obCyAQS5WhFe/*****.gif[/IMG]

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP