Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

FROM NOV. 7Th

I know that you do not like the truth but this is the truth and if you look further down, you can see an example of it for IV below!!!

Here is a case where there are witnesses that know the truth yet you think that USADA TUEC gets it right every time? If done right, they just see what the athlete's doctor wants to show them:

Read further down where it proves that YOU WERE WRONG in your response to this a few days ago!!!


4) The case above about "coach Alberto Salazar and his athletes".

YOU WERE WRONG AGAIN!!!

They tried to manipulate every which way they can including getting BS TUEs!!!!! LOL ...

"In 2015, Salazar was the subject of a ProPublica and BBC report alleging he pushed the boundaries on doping rules to gain a competitive advantage by encouraging the use of prescription medication and the****utic use exemptions."

"The Gouchers also mentioned how Salazar would push for a TUE for an intravenous drip for Rupp ahead of races. Manipulating the TUE process to get a TUE would be grounds for a ban by the World Anti-Doping Agency"

LOL


That is why I pointed out to you that it can be beat and provided an example above with that coach! Not the first time and not the last time!

.

FROM NOV. 7Th

Was it a spelling mistake when I posted you saying the below

OR

Was it that you are going to go home and DEFLECT from the TRUTH?






Dummy? Really?


.

FROM NOV. 7Th

I agree.

Above example, he says "You ****ed up, dummy"

but the truth is that I was right. The doctor that I mentioned would get his athlete's BS TUEs but Travestyny went, as usual, one step further than he should have and now in his next post, he knows that he cannot say that he is a dummy and WRONG.

So he will certainly be DEFLECTING on this point.

My reply on Nov. 7th!!!

LMAOOOOO. OWNAGE COMING UP YET AGAIN!!!!

Posted this before (which you clearly didn't read), and I'm going to post it again!!!!

I'm assuming that you didn't look into this at all. By "abusing the the****utic use exemptions system," apparently what was meant was trying to work around it so that a TUE would NOT have to be applied for. The guy gave infusions, via small injections under 50ml. He had several emails with someone at USADA who specializes in TUE's to understand the rules and in particular when a TUE would NOT have to be applied for. Oh, and there is a document detailing all of this, once again, BY USADA. Isn't it ironic that each time you deflect to another athlete, it's USADA who is on their ass?

Here is one of his emails to his athletes, in which he tells them they will NOT need a TUE. HE OBVIOUSLY WAS TRYING TO AVOID THE TUE PROCESS!

HI Dathan, Alvina ,and Galen, For your interest. When asked about an Infusion, you are to say no. LCarnitine and Iron in the way we have it done is classified as an injection. So no TUE’s and no declaration needed, not online and not when asked about infusions when getting drug tested in or out of competition.. Thanks.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B12...puUklyRzQ/view

It's an over 200 page document by USADA. Feel free to look into it!

But I'm not done with you!!!

You gave information about Goucher claiming Salazar trained Rupp to receive TUE's for IV's. Well Goucher is one of the people who talked to USADA during their investigation. NOWHERE IN THAT INVESTIGATION DOES IT REVEAL THAT GOUCHER CLAIMED RUPP HAD A TUE FOR AN IV.

Here is proof that Goucher talked to USADA:

Goucher*said that she would share more information with the anti-doping agency. Other athletes also came forward to discuss Salazar with*USADA.
https://www.si.com/olympics/2017/02/...stigation-nike

and here:

The Gouchers told USADA that during their initial consultations with Dr. Brown
he instructed them to “tell me everything you’re on...
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B12...puUklyRzQ/view

Oh, but I'm not done with you!

During the fancy bears hack into WADA, they revealed Galen Rupp's TUE's. Hmmmmmm.

Rupp had three TUEs listed, all from 2009. The first was in July from the IAAF for methylprednisolone. Then in October, Rupp received TUEs from USADA for two drugs: salmeterol and salbutamol. Both were substances found in medication Rupp was taking at the time, the salmeterol in Advair, used to treat asthma, and the salbutamol in Combivent, another bronchodilator used to increase air flow to the lungs.

Quick Thought #1: Neither Rupp nor Flanagan’s TUEs were surprising or controversial
Rupp’s TUEs confirmed what we already knew — that he has taken medication to combat asthma and allergies in the past. In the 2012 story in dailyRx News, Rupp said that he was taking Advair daily and Combivent before running (which likely means daily since Rupp runs every day). Currently, Rupp likely*does not need a TUE to take either medication. The substances contained within — salmeterol and salbutamol — are not banned assuming normal dosage
http://www.letsrun.com/news/2016/09/...i-doping-data/

UM...I DON'T SEE ANYTHING ABOUT AN IV THERE, YOU MORON!!!!!

BUT WAIT...I'M NOT DONE WITH YOU.

Salazar actually went on record and said that wasn't all of Rupp's TUE's. He said he had only 2 TUE's since 2010. Uh oh...maybe that's where the IV comes in, right?

WRONG. They were for his confirmed asthma problems, you idiot!

Galen has fully disclosed his asthma and allergy treatment to USADA. In 2013, Galen provided USADA with over 500 pages of medical records and documents regarding his asthma treatment and the medications he had taken. These records, which date back to May 2001, include Galen’s medication records and show each time he has been prescribed prednisone to treat his asthma flare ups. USADA reviewed these documents and concurred that Galen’s treatment and use of prescribed medicines were consistent the WADA Code and the manufacturer’s recommended the****utic regimen.

The article reports that Galen has received TUEs by manipulating the TUE system and that Galen has received numerous TUEs for multiple different treatments are also false. Since 2010 Galen has received 2 TUEs – both for the short term use of prednisone to treat his asthma. He received one TUE in July 2011 at the US Nationals and he received one TUE in February 2012. Galen has not had any TUEs since February 2012. That is 0 in 2013, 0 in 2014 and 0 in 2015.
Also, Galen never utilized a TUE for an IV treatment. Kara Goucher’s claim that I have coached Galen to receive TUEs is completely false. *
https://nikeoregonproject.com/blogs/...-letter-part-1

BY THE WAY, THIS LETTER BY SALAZAR IS REFERENCED IN USADA'S INVESTIGATION, BlTCH!!!

4. Salazar issues “Open Letter” on June 24, 2015 in response to media stories ..30
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B12...puUklyRzQ/view

NO CORRECTION ABOUT THE TUES!!!!

SAY WHAT? NEVER FOR AN IV. LOOKS LIKE YOU WERE ****ING WRONG, YOU MORON. HOW ABOUT DOING SOME ****ING RESEARCH FIRST BEFORE YOU GO MOUTHING OFF, YOU HEAR? WHAT YOU GOT NOW, BlTCH???

TRY DEFLECTING THAT, BlTCH! YOU GOT OWNED YET AGAIN!!!!

THIS WAS ALL ON NOV. 7TH IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS. IT'S NOW NOV. 12TH IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS. BUT ADP02 SAYS I'M DEFLECTING.....YET HE REFUSES TO FESS UP TO THIS. SAID HE "DIDN'T READ IT." THAT SEEMS VERY STRANGE BEING THAT YOU ASKED ME TO RESPOND TO IT 3 TIMES IN A ROW. HMMMMMMM.....

SO WHO IS THE DEFLECTOR, BlTCH? DEFLECTION BY WAY OF COMPLETELY IGNORING POSTS!!!! I'm sure your "not reading" had nothing to do with you getting owned on the very point that you were saying I would deflect from, you piece of shlt!

Respond and give me the link I asked for. I'm waiting...

[Shape up]

See, this is what I mean. If you stop and do some research, you would be much better off.

[B]
CONFIRMATION THAT USADA INFORMED GOLDEN BOY ON OCTOBER 16TH THAT MORALES FAILED, AND INFORMED NYSAC ON OCTOBER 17TH.

ARTICLE IS DATED OCTOBER 18TH.

FIGHT TOOK PLACE OCTOBER 20TH.[/B


Do you admit you were wrong about this?

This writer submitted a request for information to the New York State Athletic Commission asking whether it was advised that Erik Morales had tested positive for Clenbuterol prior to the Oct. 18, 2012, revelation on Halestorm Sports.
On Aug. 10, 2015, Laz Benitez (a spokesperson for the New York State Department of State, which oversees the NYSAC) advised in writing, “There is no indication in the Commission’s files that it was notified of this matter prior to October 18, 2012--------- so usada said they contacted morales by email, yet they said they phoned the NYSAC to tell them, no confirmation email, and you want to take golden boys word on what happened, who had more money to lose in this situation, the promoters or the NYSAC, imagine how many refunds if the fight was cancelled, you keep ****ing on about how professional USADA is, yet even they admit only a phone call to the commission, YEAH RIGHT

[travestyny]

this writer submitted a request for information to the new york state athletic commission asking whether it was advised that erik morales had tested positive for clenbuterol prior to the oct. 18, 2012, revelation on halestorm sports.
On aug. 10, 2015, laz benitez (a spokesperson for the new york state department of state, which oversees the nysac) advised in writing, “there is no indication in the commission’s files that it was notified of this matter prior to october 18, 2012--------- so usada said they contacted morales by email, yet they said they phoned the nysac to tell them, no confirmation email, and you want to take golden boys word on what happened, who had more money to lose in this situation, the promoters or the nysac, imagine how many refunds if the fight was cancelled, you keep ****ing on about how professional usada is, yet even they admit only a phone call to the commission, yeah right

what are you talking about???? The promotor mentioned it to boxing scene before the fight even took place!!!! It's on this ****ing website and clearly dated before the fight! THAT MEANS EVEN THE PUBLIC WAS INFORMED!

if you can't admit that hauser was proven wrong here, you're also not worth talking to. admit you are wrong!

[Shape up]

Hey funny thing ******NY, the annex A isn't what either of us posted, it's at the end of the contract along with annex B and annex C, it doesn't help you in any way, shape or form, it doesn't cover any code or protocols, you better come up with some good arguements really fast

[Shape up]

what are you talking about???? The promotor mentioned it to boxing scene before the fight even took place!!!! It's on this ****ing website and clearly dated before the fight! THAT MEANS EVEN THE PUBLIC WAS INFORMED!

if you can't admit that hauser was proven wrong here, you're also not worth talking to. admit you are wrong!

The fight was on the 20th they are saying they weren't informed before the 18th, and there is NO EMAIL of confirmation, again USADA being shoddy to help the promoters, whom are the people paying them you turkey, but you have bigger problems, substantive change, articles omitted from the code, protocols omitted, your in the **** nuffy

[travestyny]

Hey funny thing ******NY, the annex A isn't what either of us posted, it's at the end of the contract along with annex B and annex C, it doesn't help you in any way, shape or form, it doesn't cover any code or protocols, you better come up with some good arguements really fast

Jesus Christ, you are slow.


Annex A, for the last time, is mentined IN THE USADA PROTOCOL. THE USADA PROTOCOL IS REFERRING TO IT'S OWN ANNEX A.

How can this be so hard for your to understand.

THE RULE IN THE USADA PROTOCOL THAT SAYS ANNEX A IS TO BE USED CAN NOT BE REFERRING TO THE CONTRACT FOR A BOXING MATCH!!!! WHY WOULD USADA LINK ATHLETES TO THE MAYWEATHER PACQUAIO CONTRACT???

[travestyny]

The fight was on the 20th they are saying they weren't informed before the 18th, and there is NO EMAIL of confirmation, again USADA being shoddy to help the promoters, whom are the people paying them you turkey

Dude. The quotations given prove that this is false, just like USADA said. THIS IS YOUR PROBLEM. WHEN YOU HAVE PROOF RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE, YOU STILL IGNORE IT.

[Shape up]

23.2 Implementation of the Code
23.2.1 The Signatories shall implement applicable Code provisions through policies, statutes, rules or regulations according to their authority and within their relevant spheres of responsibility.
23.2.2 The following Articles as applicable to the scope of the anti-doping activity which the anti-doping organization performs must be implemented by Signatories without substantive change (allowing for any non-substantive changes to the language in order to refer to the organization’s name, sport, section numbers, etc.):
• Article 1 (De nition of Doping)
• Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations)
• Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
• Article 4.2.2 (Speci ed Substances)
• Article 4.3.3 (Wada’s Determination of the Prohibited list)
• Article 7.11 (Retirement from Sport)
• Article 9 (Automatic disquali cation of individual Results)
• Article 10 (Sanctions on Individuals)
• Article 11 (Consequences to Teams)
• Article 13 (Appeals) with the exception of 13.2.2, 13.6, and 13.7
• Article 15.1 (Recognition of Decisions)
• Article 17 (Statute of Limitations)
• Article 24 (Interpretation of the Code)
Substantive change

[Shape up]

Quote:
Mayweather and Pacquiao agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a), and 21 of the United States Anti-Doping Agency
Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any Results Management Services provided hereunder.

Let's look at Section 5:
Quote:
5. Choice of Rules
In conducting Testing and results management under this Protocol, USADA will apply the following rules and principles:
a. Articles of the Code set forth in Annex A, which is incorporated by reference into the USADA Protocol, shall apply in all cases.-------------Section 5 was protocols, not code ******

[Shape up]

Dude. The quotations given prove that this is false, just like USADA said. THIS IS YOUR PROBLEM. WHEN YOU HAVE PROOF RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE, YOU STILL IGNORE IT.

Usada knew on the 16th ******