Quite a substantial statement given how you were repeatedly hammering the point that GGG never fought outside 160 a day in his life. On that basis alone no one can say anything about GGG's performance out of 160 because there is clearly no proof to make decisive statements. Me saying that GGG beats Lara @ 154 is unsubstantiated bs. You saying Lara beats GGG @ 154 is unsubstantiated bs. Of course, it was your statement, not mine
you're right
Golovkin talked that " anyone from 154-168 " unsubstantiated bs for FIVE YEARS
we saw in the Jacobs fight how a little movement affects Golovkin
Lara is a better boxer than Jacobs
Lara is a smaller boxer than Jacobs.
Lara is a weaker puncher than Jacobs.
Lara is a (much) smaller fighter than Jacobs.
Lara has a weaker chin than Jacobs.
Jacobs went down to GGG for going southpaw. Lara is exclusviely southpaw.
^ Clearly none of this matters when comparing Jacobs-GGG to Lara-GGG. What's Lara going to do? Fight at 154 and rehydrate to 175 or some **** like Jacobs? He still wouldn't be able to make GGG flinch and every jab from GGG will snap his head back.
Originally posted by aboutfkntime
you're right
Golovkin talked that " anyone from 154-168 " unsubstantiated bs for FIVE YEARS
that wasn't me man, that was him
just saying
Canelo said he was going to show GGG "true Mexican style". Sometimes you can't take what people say at face value, I'm sorry to admit it
Jacobs went down to GGG for going southpaw. Lara is exclusviely southpaw.
^ Clearly none of this matters when comparing Jacobs-GGG to Lara-GGG. What's Lara going to do? Fight at 154 and rehydrate to 175 or some **** like Jacobs? He still wouldn't be able to make GGG flinch and every jab from GGG will snap his head back.
Canelo said he was going to show GGG "true Mexican style". Sometimes you can't take what people say at face value, I'm sorry to admit it
FACT: Golovkin is full-of-shht, and would obviously be "weaker" and "smaller" himself, at 154
FACT: Golovkin is full-of-shht, and would obviously be "weaker" and "smaller" himself, at 154
Ah yes, free thinking again - the same that gets 118-110 tonight in some loonies minds'. So because he goes down 6 pounds below his regular weigh in, his power, chin, and overall toughness just disappears off the face of the earth right? But Lara, he becomes stronger! Like, he couldn't back Canelo all night or even do any visible damage, but he'll totally school GGG in a way that Canelo couldn't even fathom last night. GGG will be backing up taking straight punches from the machine Lara!
stop drinking the kool aid, that myth is busted
Hahaha, keep comparing little Lara to 185 Jacobs as "proof" that GGG can't fight a boxer. He already beat one boxer with 10+ lbs on him, he'll beat the boxer -10 lbs on him, it just doesn't matter.
Ah yes, free thinking again - the same that gets 118-110 tonight in some loonies minds'. So because he goes down 6 pounds below his regular weigh in, his power, chin, and overall toughness just disappears off the face of the earth right? But Lara, he becomes stronger! Like, he couldn't back Canelo all night or even do any visible damage, but he'll totally school GGG in a way that Canelo couldn't even fathom last night. GGG will be backing up taking straight punches from the machine Lara!
Hahaha, keep comparing little Lara to 185 Jacobs as "proof" that GGG can't fight a boxer. He already beat one boxer with 10+ lbs on him, he'll beat the boxer -10 lbs on him, it just doesn't matter.
keep thinking that Golovkin would be the same at 154
he would not be GGG, he would only be GG..... and 2 G's are not enough G's to beat the slick Cuban southpaw WHO WAS WILLING TO FIGHT HIM AT 160
Lara is comparatively better than Jacobs at EVERYTHING except for raw power, and you don't need raw power to beat Golovkin
Comment