Comments Thread For: Canelo: I Did Not Feel Golovkin's Power, Not Really

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PETUFF
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2012
    • 3047
    • 117
    • 4
    • 14,565

    #41
    They both garbage ! COTTO beat any of this guys

    Comment

    • SplitSecond
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 23151
      • 1,715
      • 1,187
      • 85,044

      #42
      Originally posted by FrankieBruno
      i had canelo winning by 2 rounds
      Way to expose yourself.

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47370
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #43
        Originally posted by Daccan
        Quite a substantial statement given how you were repeatedly hammering the point that GGG never fought outside 160 a day in his life. On that basis alone no one can say anything about GGG's performance out of 160 because there is clearly no proof to make decisive statements. Me saying that GGG beats Lara @ 154 is unsubstantiated bs. You saying Lara beats GGG @ 154 is unsubstantiated bs. Of course, it was your statement, not mine

        you're right

        Golovkin talked that " anyone from 154-168 " unsubstantiated bs for FIVE YEARS

        that wasn't me man, that was him

        just saying

        Comment

        • Daccan
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Aug 2015
          • 116
          • 15
          • 0
          • 6,262

          #44
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          we saw in the Jacobs fight how a little movement affects Golovkin

          Lara is a better boxer than Jacobs
          Lara is a smaller boxer than Jacobs.

          Lara is a weaker puncher than Jacobs.

          Lara is a (much) smaller fighter than Jacobs.

          Lara has a weaker chin than Jacobs.

          Jacobs went down to GGG for going southpaw. Lara is exclusviely southpaw.


          ^ Clearly none of this matters when comparing Jacobs-GGG to Lara-GGG. What's Lara going to do? Fight at 154 and rehydrate to 175 or some **** like Jacobs? He still wouldn't be able to make GGG flinch and every jab from GGG will snap his head back.

          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          you're right

          Golovkin talked that " anyone from 154-168 " unsubstantiated bs for FIVE YEARS

          that wasn't me man, that was him

          just saying
          Canelo said he was going to show GGG "true Mexican style". Sometimes you can't take what people say at face value, I'm sorry to admit it
          Last edited by Daccan; 09-17-2017, 07:14 AM.

          Comment

          • Czarczar
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jul 2012
            • 903
            • 45
            • 1
            • 10,297

            #45
            But but he ran

            GGG couldn't do anything to Canelo all those multiple times he was on the ropes.

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47370
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #46
              Originally posted by Daccan
              Lara is a smaller boxer than Jacobs.

              Lara is a weaker puncher than Jacobs.

              Lara is a (much) smaller fighter than Jacobs.

              Lara has a weaker chin than Jacobs.

              Jacobs went down to GGG for going southpaw. Lara is exclusviely southpaw.


              ^ Clearly none of this matters when comparing Jacobs-GGG to Lara-GGG. What's Lara going to do? Fight at 154 and rehydrate to 175 or some **** like Jacobs? He still wouldn't be able to make GGG flinch and every jab from GGG will snap his head back.

              Canelo said he was going to show GGG "true Mexican style". Sometimes you can't take what people say at face value, I'm sorry to admit it

              FACT: Golovkin is full-of-shht, and would obviously be "weaker" and "smaller" himself, at 154

              stop drinking the kool aid, that myth is busted

              Comment

              • MisanthropicNY
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2014
                • 7680
                • 288
                • 6
                • 37,612

                #47
                No power... but had you running all night and barely throwing and lost 9-3..if you take away the sympathy rounds...

                Comment

                • Daccan
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Aug 2015
                  • 116
                  • 15
                  • 0
                  • 6,262

                  #48
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                  FACT: Golovkin is full-of-shht, and would obviously be "weaker" and "smaller" himself, at 154
                  Ah yes, free thinking again - the same that gets 118-110 tonight in some loonies minds'. So because he goes down 6 pounds below his regular weigh in, his power, chin, and overall toughness just disappears off the face of the earth right? But Lara, he becomes stronger! Like, he couldn't back Canelo all night or even do any visible damage, but he'll totally school GGG in a way that Canelo couldn't even fathom last night. GGG will be backing up taking straight punches from the machine Lara!

                  stop drinking the kool aid, that myth is busted
                  Hahaha, keep comparing little Lara to 185 Jacobs as "proof" that GGG can't fight a boxer. He already beat one boxer with 10+ lbs on him, he'll beat the boxer -10 lbs on him, it just doesn't matter.

                  Comment

                  • aboutfkntime
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 47370
                    • 1,631
                    • 3,563
                    • 391,308

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Daccan
                    Ah yes, free thinking again - the same that gets 118-110 tonight in some loonies minds'. So because he goes down 6 pounds below his regular weigh in, his power, chin, and overall toughness just disappears off the face of the earth right? But Lara, he becomes stronger! Like, he couldn't back Canelo all night or even do any visible damage, but he'll totally school GGG in a way that Canelo couldn't even fathom last night. GGG will be backing up taking straight punches from the machine Lara!



                    Hahaha, keep comparing little Lara to 185 Jacobs as "proof" that GGG can't fight a boxer. He already beat one boxer with 10+ lbs on him, he'll beat the boxer -10 lbs on him, it just doesn't matter.

                    keep thinking that Golovkin would be the same at 154

                    he would not be GGG, he would only be GG..... and 2 G's are not enough G's to beat the slick Cuban southpaw WHO WAS WILLING TO FIGHT HIM AT 160

                    Lara is comparatively better than Jacobs at EVERYTHING except for raw power, and you don't need raw power to beat Golovkin

                    keep thinking that Jacobs weighed 185

                    Comment

                    • stuff jones
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2013
                      • 1830
                      • 76
                      • 7
                      • 13,770

                      #50
                      Ok. That's why he was on his bike all night fighting like Erislandy Fn Lara?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP