Name 1 Prime A-level fighter that Mayweather has on his resume......

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Then you have Pacquiao beating 3 of the top5 greatest mexican fighters of all time at their prime abd at their best weight. Ali beating 3 of tHe 10 greatest heavies of all time. Its laugjable to compare mays resume whose filled with the ortiz abd maidanas of the world

It really is.

Pac may have fought Barrera toward his end but MAB did crush Paulie Ayala and decision Morales afterward. So it's still very credible.

Marquez and Morales were definitely prime IMO. Plus Pac gave everybody rematches- Morales, Marquez, Barrera, Bradley.

[RussB23]

None of those were prime bro

How is 3 undefeated fighters not in their prime?

[ironmt]

It really is.

Pac may have fought Barrera toward his end but MAB did crush Paulie Ayala and decision Morales afterward. So it's still very credible.

Marquez and Morales were definitely prime IMO. Plus Pac gave everybody rematches- Morales, Marquez, Barrera, Bradley.

Barrera was only 29 years of age and coming off of the best wins of his career against Hamed, Morales, Tapia and Kelly. It was a great win for Pacquiao and better than anyone on Floyd's resume.

[RussB23]

You guys act like floyd beat washed up versions of those fighters. When he fought them they were still very good fighters and not scrubs by any means. Mosley was coming off of his biggest win which was margarito for example. Cotto was still a great fighter regardless of what margarito and manny did to him. Delahoya was still good.

you act like floyd can control what era hes in, he fought who he could and he beat them all, he wasnt even in his prime at WW anyway, he was fighting bigger guys most of the time there too. floyds prime was in the lower divisions. he just was still better than everyone else and sustained success longer than anyone in history probably while fighting credible names and making most look very ordinary.

[Thraxox]

It really is.

Pac may have fought Barrera toward his end but MAB did crush Paulie Ayala and decision Morales afterward. So it's still very credible.

Marquez and Morales were definitely prime IMO. Plus Pac gave everybody rematches- Morales, Marquez, Barrera, Bradley.

Pacquiao disnt fought Barrera at his end though that was at the secobd fight. In the first fight Pac fought a 28 year old barrera who was having wins with the likes of Naseem Hamed, Morales , Ayala. After Pacquiao defeted Barrera first time Barrera went on to defeat Morales at the third fight and be on the P4p list till the day Pacquiao beat him the second time at 33 years old. So Barrera was prime when Pacquiao fought him the first time.

[RussB23]

Barrera was only 29 years of age and coming off of the best wins of his career against Hamed, Morales, Tapia and Kelly. It was a great win for Pacquiao and better than anyone on Floyd's resume.

And floyds win over pacman himself is even better lol.

oh i forgot "his shoulder doe"

[Thraxox]

You guys act like floyd beat washed up versions of those fighters. When he fought them they were still very good fighters and not scrubs by any means. Mosley was coming off of his biggest win which was margarito for example. Cotto was still a great fighter regardless of what margarito and manny did to him. Delahoya was still good.

you act like floyd can control what era hes in, he fought who he could and he beat them all, he wasnt even in his prime at WW anyway, he was fighting bigger guys most of the time there too. floyds prime was in the lower divisions. he just was still better than everyone else and sustained success longer than anyone in history probably while fighting credible names and making most look very ordinary.

Not a good reason. What stopped Floyd fighting prime Williams, prime cotto and prime sergio martinez along with prime margarito when they were calling him out to fight. Why did floyd pull marquez at lightweight then instead of fighting thise mentioned? Admit it man Floyd avoided certain fighters that had great chances of beating him. His resume is good but just not good enough to be mentioned with the likes of Ali and SRR etc. Etc.

[ironmt]

And floyds win over pacman himself is even better lol.

oh i forgot "his shoulder doe"

Sorry, but beating a 36 year old Pacquiao who was knocked out cold for close to two minutes Is not equivalent to Pacquiao beating Marco Antonio Barerra who was 29 years old and coming off of the best wins of his career. No one on Floyd's resume tops Barrera.

[Schmerzen]

Hmmmm Pacquiao vs Marquez TWICE 1,2. At their best weight.

Pacquiao vs Barrera while Pacquiao was green against Barreras best weight in his prime.

Erik Morales vs Pacquiao, while morales was starting to slide.

Then you have Andre Ward vs Sergey Kovalev Both are primes and A-level.

When people starts to claim Floyds resume should be mentioned along fighters like SRL, Ali who actually fought prime a-level fighters. We would be saying "hold on, who did floyd fought in their primea that his resume would be on par with theirs?" and put down the facts

did he ever beat marquez convincingly? all of their fights were highly controversial until marquez finally put him to sleep. it's one thing to fight an "A-level" fighter in his prime, it's another thing to beat him convincingly. floyd had only one controversial fight vs castillo, he made clear in the second fight he is the superior boxer. while pacquiao vs marquez 2 was even more controversial than the first one.

[RussB23]

Sorry, but beating a 36 year old Pacquiao who was knocked out cold for close to two minutes Is not equivalent to Pacquiao beating Marco Antonio Barerra who was 29 years old and coming off of the best wins of his career. No one on Floyd's resume tops Barrera.

False, manny at the time floyd fought him was still the 2nd best guy in the division and no one except floyd would have beaten him. Manny now is completely past it, he was still a beast when floyd beat him. And floyd wasnt in his prime either.

Win is legit. Sorry.