Should NSAC be held accountable...

[TheBigLug]

Let's say Floyd absolutely puts a beating on McGregor or knocks him out in a way that makes uncomfortable viewing, can you see there being some serious questions asked to the NSAC about how they have allowed a novice fighter get in with an elite boxer?

It wouldnt be sanctioned under normal circumstances but they have let money talk of course.

[Eff Pandas]

Yea if Conor gets hurt in this fight or worse case dies or something completely effed up happens boxing & the NSAC got some serous questions to answer. I'm surprised they haven't taken that into account more with some of these decisions they've made.

Something bad in this fight could drastically alter some rules & requirements of boxings & officials.

[Lester Tutor]

Yea if Conor gets hurt in this fight or worse case dies or something completely effed up happens boxing & the NSAC got some serous questions to answer. I'm surprised they haven't taken that into account more with some of these decisions they've made.

Something bad in this fight could drastically alter some rules & requirements of boxings & officials.

You're suspect. Why are you defending a UFC fighter and it's organization when they were exploiting another combat sports star's name for revenue gain? And worse the UFC allowed Conor to say he was the face of boxing... or was all that foreshadowing that this fight was already planned since 2015?

Let me remind you, MMA is also the hurt game. Does anybody complain that Vegas has hosted bouts where boxers got "hurt" going into MMA?

This is a man's sport. Every man makes a choice going into ring.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Hell no Conor mouth wrote a check his aśś can't cash. You don't think the NSAC haven't already had both fighters sign thousands of waivers preventing them from legal action against the commission? Nobody cared when a old fat James Toney got hurt in mma.

[Eff Pandas]

You're suspect. Why are you defending a UFC fighter and it's organization when they were exploiting another combat sports star's name for revenue gain? And worse the UFC allowed Conor to say he was the face of boxing... or was all that foreshadowing that this fight was already planned since 2015?

Let me remind you, MMA is also the hurt game. Does anybody complain that Vegas has hosted bouts where boxers got "hurt" going into MMA?

This is a man's sport. Every man makes a choice going into ring.

Suspect?!?!? Suspect for being straight up about the situation?

When guys get hurt yea people question the commission. The NYSAC got a sh^t storm over that Magomed fight. And that was a evenly matched fight between two prospects.

This is a guy who's 49-0 vs a guy without a professional fight. This shouldn't be a sanctioned fight if we are all being honest & thats the truth regardless if anyone is trying to play an angle.

People keep saying if this happens or that happens then boxing looks bad & blah blah blah. And I disagree. If Floyd loses, then we got a new player in boxing who's not gonna be done with boxing. If what we expect happens happens, but not only does Conor lose, but he gets severely injured or dies than boxing has a huge sh^t storm for sanctioning a fight we all know shouldn't of been sanctioned. It'll bring people saying how dangerous boxing is & how it should be illegal & it'll bring a ton of negative press on boxing & this great year boxing has had will get turned to sh^t.

[Shape up]

You're suspect. Why are you defending a UFC fighter and it's organization when they were exploiting another combat sports star's name for revenue gain? And worse the UFC allowed Conor to say he was the face of boxing... or was all that foreshadowing that this fight was already planned since 2015?

Let me remind you, MMA is also the hurt game. Does anybody complain that Vegas has hosted bouts where boxers got "hurt" going into MMA?

This is a man's sport. Every man makes a choice going into ring.

As normal, your an imbecile, this wouldn't be going ahead if the NSAC didn't sanction it, 49-0 vs 0-0, this fight has been sanctioned for one reason, CASH, if Connor gets a brain bleed, how will explain why this was allowed to happen, considering they said Rohan Murdock WBO#6 was too much of a mismatch for Andre ward, everything will land firmly in the lap of the NSAC should something go wrong

[BrometheusBob.]

Given the attention this fight is getting, you can be dam sure if Conor is seriously damaged as a result of this fight that NSAC will be under pressure to make real changes. I wouldn't be shocked if people resigned over that.

But ugly knockouts happen all the time, so it would need to be pretty extreme.

[Eff Pandas]

Given the attention this fight is getting, you can be dam sure if Conor is seriously damaged as a result of this fight that NSAC will be under pressure to make real changes. I wouldn't be shocked if people resigned over that.

Oh 100% on that one if Conor is severely injured or dies. That dipsh^t Benton guy would probably be the first guy gone cuz he's tried to sell the reasoning they had for okaying this fight.

[SceneBoxer]

NSAC will be crucified if something fatal happens. Not only they "sanctioned" a best 49-0 boxer to fight a newbie 0-0 boxer, they even changed the rule for the normal 10 oz. gloves to be replaced with 8 oz. gloves. A dangerous exception to the rules.

Boxing has the dumbest fans in all sports. They eat the s.hit fights the boxing orgs, promoters, cherry picker boxers served them. Worst of all, these dumb boxing fans even supported and will buy this $100 joke, farce fight.

[Ray*]

Did you see the reasons outlined by the so called commission for approving the fight? The reasons were disgraceful.. Like someone else pointed out on here earlier this month, this same commission reject the Ward v Brand, but claimed because Conor fought Nate diaz standing up in the rematch and took some punches from him, and the fact that Nate diaz had spar some boxers like Andre Ward, they deem Conor capable of protecting himself. Which brings the question why did they reject Andre Ward v Brand?