Who's the most overrated boxers

[Sir_Didymus]

Since you seem to like stats take some more from
Marvin Haglers resume.
His 31st fight was against the legend DC Walker with the amazing record of 2-11-1
His 33rd fight was against the one and only George Davis with the impressive record of 11-17-1
His 35th fight was against the ATG Reggie Ford with the distinguished record of 0-1-0
His 39th fight was against the HOFamer Jim Henry with the monumental record of 11 26 3
And last but not least his 45th fight was against the monster and world beater Willie Warren with the unreal record of 44 38 3....
IT SEEMS BROOK AT LEAST FOUGHT MUCH LESS BUMS AND AT MUCH EARLIER STAGE IN HIS CAREER THAN THE MARVELOUS HUH???
Hagler what a bum im sure you agree according to your logic


A lot of people were calling him the best welter in the world including me and the Ring magazine and he probably was.

Oh look. This guy likes numbers and facts. Let's see...

Marvin Haglers 67 opponents combined had 451 losses

Brooks 38 fights combined opponent losses 925 (EXCLUDING THE TWO OTHER TIMES HE FOUGHT ERNIE SMITH AND THE REMATCH WITH CARSON JONES)

If I add the numbers from the rematches that number for Brook goes way beyond 1000.

Now let's look further. Haglers fought numerous big names of the times. Held a title for almost 6 years before losing a debatable decision to the legendary Sugar Ray Leonard.

Brook? Please don't make us laugh. Held the title for three years. Fought bums as he did all throughout his career. Won it off a wind-milling midget in a debatable decision. First real test and we all saw how he took a knee and QUIT after getting his other orbital smashed. Yet you have the audacity to even mention Brook in comparison to Hagler who is a legend of the sport? LOL!!

Put simply...

GTFOH you Kell Brook nuthugger. What a dumbass.

[lparm]

Anyone that thinks Manny is overrated is on crack.

He fought and beat 3 of the greatest featherweights in history in their primes. At 126 and 130 only, Manny was a legend. Everything after that was gravy. Floyd never fought a since prime ATG at 130 or 135.

[Leonis]

Oh look. This guy likes numbers and facts. Let's see...

Marvin Haglers 67 opponents combined had 451 losses

Brooks 38 fights combined opponent losses 925 (EXCLUDING THE TWO OTHER TIMES HE FOUGHT ERNIE SMITH AND THE REMATCH WITH CARSON JONES)

If I add the numbers from the rematches that number for Brook goes way beyond 1000.

Now let's look further. Haglers fought numerous big names of the times. Held a title for almost 6 years before losing a debatable decision to the legendary Sugar Ray Leonard.

Brook? Please don't make us laugh. Held the title for three years. Fought bums as he did all throughout his career. Won it off a wind-milling midget in a debatable decision. First real test and we all saw how he took a knee and QUIT after getting his other orbital smashed. Yet you have the audacity to even mention Brook in comparison to Hagler who is a legend of the sport? LOL!!

Put simply...

GTFOH you Kell Brook nuthugger. What a dumbass.

Hagler is on my top10 of all time chill out boy im not comparing Brook to Hagler my point is that most fighters have fought against fighters with losing records including some ATGs like Hagler

[Sir_Didymus]

Hagler is on my top10 of all time chill out boy im not comparing Brook to Hagler my point is that most fighters have fought against fighters with losing records including some ATGs like Hagler

No. You clearly thought you could justify Brooks absolutely pathetic record using a legends name dropping selective facts and numbers hoping nobody would call you out on your nonsense.

You're doing the very same thing now pretending you didn't just get your ass handed to you on a platter trying to worm your way out of it with this bit of genius...

"most fighters have fought against fighters with losing records

Well duh. Dummy. Or did you think every boxer has a perfect and unblemished record?

Man what a dumbass.

You're a hurting hardcore Kell Brook fanboy. Nothing more. I'll drop the mic.

[Leonis]

No. You clearly thought you could justify Brooks absolutely pathetic record using a legends name dropping selective facts and numbers hoping nobody would call you out on your nonsense.

You're doing the very same thing now pretending you didn't just get your ass handed to you on a platter trying to worm your way out of it with this bit of genius...

"most fighters have fought against fighters with losing records

Well duh. Dummy. Or did you think every boxer has a perfect and unblemished record?

Man what a dumbass.

You're a hurting hardcore Kell Brook fanboy. Nothing more. I'll drop the mic.

Stay away from the kitchen knifes.
Brook is 100% legit you are just a hater

[Sir_Didymus]

Stay away from the kitchen knifes.
Brook is 100% legit you are just a hater

Whatever helps you sleep at night, fanboy.

[Chuckguy]

I knew someone would say it but I didn't think it would be the first post

Ha that's why I did it

[Sp0rty Cr@ig]

Cotto - Lost all his biggest fights apart from the Martinez knee injury fight

Bradley - his whole reputation is built off a robbery

Joshua - beat Fury's leftovers and got 10x more praise than Fury ever did. Even though he went life & death with Wlad while Fury won easily



Broner is not overrated. He was a hype job but no one considers him an A level fighter anymore

[Holystroke3]

Bradley - his whole reputation is built off a robbery

Never been a TB fan but his "whole reputation" is not "built off a robbery"

[Mike D]

Since you seem to like stats take some more from
Marvin Haglers resume.
His 31st fight was against the legend DC Walker with the amazing record of 2-11-1
His 33rd fight was against the one and only George Davis with the impressive record of 11-17-1
His 35th fight was against the ATG Reggie Ford with the distinguished record of 0-1-0
His 39th fight was against the HOFamer Jim Henry with the monumental record of 11 26 3
And last but not least his 45th fight was against the monster and world beater Willie Warren with the unreal record of 44 38 3....
IT SEEMS BROOK AT LEAST FOUGHT MUCH LESS BUMS AND AT MUCH EARLIER STAGE IN HIS CAREER THAN THE MARVELOUS HUH???
Hagler what a bum im sure you agree according to your logic


A lot of people were calling him the best welter in the world including me and the Ring magazine and he probably was.

First off I never said that Brook was a bum. Wildly overrated yes IMO, obviously not a bum, though.

And dude. So you say Andre Ward, who is one of the most decorated and accomplished fighters of his era, has "next to no boxing skill"...but that Kell Brook, who has one notable win in his entire career...was the best welter on earth based off that?