Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Shakes Head: I'm Tired of Childish Actions By Canelo!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
    On Canelo's terms? Are you serious? What the fuck is he sulking and complaining about for then?

    And if you think GGG is getting paid less now than he would have got when Canelo was the WBC champion, you're delusional!

    Golovkin turned down $10million Expo 2017 money for a unification fight with BJS in Kazakhstan to fight Canelo instead. Get real, ffs!

    Where was Canelo going to go after fighting Chavez if he hadn't signed with Golovkin? Back to 260K PPVs, and falling, that's where!



    Fight's happening on Canelo's terms doe ... yeah right!
    BBB sides team is quoted as saying they wanted a 50/50 PPV split and a purse bid would have given them 40%. He didn't get anywhere near that. They balked at the $10 million but made sure the terms weren't disclosed. Anyone with a half a brain knows they got hosed and less than they wanted and didn't want the public to know. After the Jacobs PPV bombed they had no leg to stand on and took what was offered.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by QballLobo View Post
      BBB sides team is quoted as saying they wanted a 50/50 PPV split and a purse bid would have given them 40%. He didn't get anywhere near that. They balked at the $10 million but made sure the terms weren't disclosed. Anyone with a half a brain knows they got hosed and less than they wanted and didn't want the public to know. After the Jacobs PPV bombed they had no leg to stand on and took what was offered.
      GGG was entitled to 30% if it had gone to a bid. Check the WBC website. The rule giving interim champions a bigger split than regular mandos was removed in 2014.

      But there would have been no need for a puse bid if Canelo had made Golovkin a reasonable offer, instead of handing over the belt and running away when GGG wouldn't agree to wait another year for his shot.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
        GGG was entitled to 30% if it had gone to a bid. Check the WBC website. The rule giving interim champions a bigger split than regular mandos was removed in 2014.

        But there would have been no need for a puse bid if Canelo had made Golovkin a reasonable offer, instead of handing over the belt and running away when GGG wouldn't agree to wait another year for his shot.
        There's no rule there so where are you getting 30%? The standard is 55/45, every WBC interim v champ is 55/45 to the champ if you don't agree prove me wrong. We've been over this many times. ******

        Even Sulaiman stated what the rule is last year.

        "Bellew asked for an exception to face David Haye and be allowed to keep his title until after that fight. No. 1 contender Mairis Breidis and No. 2 Marco Huck have been mandated to face each other to become the interim champion. Both sides were happy to work together to make the fight; they have 30 days to come to an agreement.
        Huck’s representative asked that if Bellew loses and goes back to cruiserweight that the Breidis-Huck winner vs. Bellew to be a 50-50 purse split. Sulaiman explained that the rule is 55-45 for the champion"

        https://www.******.com/477450-wbc-an...y-challengers/

        Why you always lying?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
          There's no rule there so where are you getting 30%? The standard is 55/45, every WBC interim v champ is 55/45 to the champ if you don't agree prove me wrong. We've been over this many times. ******

          Even Sulaiman stated what the rule is last year.

          "Bellew asked for an exception to face David Haye and be allowed to keep his title until after that fight. No. 1 contender Mairis Breidis and No. 2 Marco Huck have been mandated to face each other to become the interim champion. Both sides were happy to work together to make the fight; they have 30 days to come to an agreement.
          Huck’s representative asked that if Bellew loses and goes back to cruiserweight that the Breidis-Huck winner vs. Bellew to be a 50-50 purse split. Sulaiman explained that the rule is 55-45 for the champion"

          https://www.******.com/477450-wbc-an...y-challengers/

          Why you always lying?
          Why is it that you idiots keep posting me links that don't work?

          And why accuse me of lying when I've posted working links ro the WBC rules on purse splits many times, so you can see for yourself that there is no rule entitling an interim or diamond title holder to any more than the regular mandatory challenger's cut.

          There was a rule entitling an interim champ to 45% but it was changed in 2014.

          Yes, the WBC can make exceptions and alter the purse split if they decide the circumstances warrant it, and there are rules in place governing how and why that can happen. Eg, Kovalev was granted a 50/50 split in the event of a purse bid when he was made mando for Stevenson, after a petition by Kathy Duva.

          Did GGG petition the WBC asking for more than his regulation split for Canelo if it went to a bid? If he did, I never heard anything about it.

          http://wbcboxing.com/wbceng/Rules/WB...anuary2014.pdf

          2.17 Division of Proceeds in a Purse Offer.

          The net purse offer (after deduction of all sanction
          fees payable to the WBC hereunder) shall be divided as follows:
          (a) 70% for the champion and 30% for the challenger in title bouts; and
          (b) 50% to each contender in the case of vacant titles or elimination bouts;
          provided, however, that the WBC Board of Governors, may by a majority vote, authorize a
          modification of the division of purse offer proceeds between boxers in a purse offer in
          unusual or special cases, such as consideration
          of outstanding marketing value of one of the
          boxers, as the WBC shall determine in its sole discretion. The modification of the split
          shall be limited to 60-40% and 55-45%, except
          in the most exceptional circumstances, in
          which the split may be modified to 50-50%.
          Last edited by kafkod; 08-02-2017, 08:35 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
            Why is it that you idiots keep posting me links that don't work?

            And why accuse me of lying when I've posted working links ro the WBC rules on purse splits many times, so you can see for yourself that there is no rule entitling an interim or diamond title holder to any more than the regular mandatory challenger's cut.

            Yes, the WBC can make exceptions and alter the purse split if they decide the circumstances warrant it, and there are rules in place governing how and why that can happen. Eg, Kovalev was granted a 50/50 split in the event of a purse bid when he was made mando for Stevenson after a petition by Kathy Duva.

            Did GGG petition the WBC asking for more than his regulation split for Canelo if it went to a bid? If he did, I never heard anything about it.

            http://wbcboxing.com/wbceng/Rules/WB...anuary2014.pdf

            2.17 Division of Proceeds in a Purse Offer.

            The net purse offer (after deduction of all sanction
            fees payable to the WBC hereunder) shall be divided as follows:
            (a) 70% for the champion and 30% for the challenger in title bouts; and
            (b) 50% to each contender in the case of vacant titles or elimination bouts;
            provided, however, that the WBC Board of Governors, may by a majority vote, authorize a
            modification of the division of purse offer proceeds between boxers in a purse offer in
            unusual or special cases, such as consideration
            of outstanding marketing value of one of the
            boxers, as the WBC shall determine in its sole discretion. The modification of the split
            shall be limited to 60-40% and 55-45%, except
            in the most exceptional circumstances, in
            which the split may be modified to 50-50%.


            Interim champion isn't a mandatory.

            The standard is 55/45 for champ vs interim. All the boxing media Steve Kim, Dan Rafael, Kevin Iole all reported it. Sulaiman even said it's 55/45. You're a ******.

            Show me any fight where the split was 70/30 for champ vs interim. I bet you can't.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
              Interim champion isn't a mandatory.

              The standard is 55/45 for champ vs interim. All the boxing media Steve Kim, Dan Rafael, Kevin Iole all reported it. Sulaiman even said it's 55/45. You're a ******.

              Show me any fight where the split was 70/30 for champ vs interim. I bet you can't.
              I don't give a shit what those useless hacks said.

              And yes, I know "Interim champ isn't a mandatory" is a ******ed comment, you didn't didn't need to post a dunce hat with it.

              Did Sulaiman say the purse split would be 55/45 for GGG vs Canelo? If he did, stop fannying around and post a link to where he said it so we can get this question settled.

              And btw, if you have any evidence of GGG trying to force a purse bid between him and Canelo .. post links to that too.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                I don't give a shit what those useless hacks said.

                And yes, I know "Interim champ isn't a mandatory" is a ******ed comment, you didn't didn't need to post a dunce hat with it.

                Did Sulaiman say the purse split would be 55/45 for GGG vs Canelo? If he did, stop fannying around and post a link to where he said it so we can get this question settled.

                And btw, if you have any evidence of GGG trying to force a purse bid between him and Canelo .. post links to that too.
                You're claiming everyone is wrong. You prove it's not 55/45. You can't. It's funny you trying to argue what is widely known with nothing though.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                  You're claiming everyone is wrong. You prove it's not 55/45. You can't. It's funny you trying to argue what is widely known with nothing though.
                  LMFAO!

                  So we've gone from "I can prove it was 55/45" to "You prove it's not 55/45"

                  Jeez, you guys!
                  Last edited by kafkod; 08-02-2017, 09:09 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    LMFAO!

                    So we've gone from "I can prove it was 55/45" to "You prove it's not 55/45"

                    Jeez, you guys!
                    Where did I say that? Lying again.

                    You have literally nothing to prove it's not 55/45.

                    I have history and all the boxing reporters, who would know about these things more than you do.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                      Where did I say that? Lying again.

                      You have literally nothing to prove it's not 55/45.

                      I have history and all the boxing reporters, who would know about these things more than you do.
                      All boxing reporters .. or just a couple of lazy hacks who can't be arsed keeping abreast of the rules and doing their jobs properly?


                      The WBC used to have a rule giving 55% to the champion and 45% in the event of a purse bid, but they did away with that in 2014, and I have posted you a link to prove it.

                      Now grow up and stop acting like a fucking child trying to deny reality.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP