Using Hagler as an example he lost in his 27th and 29th bouts to Watts and Monroe. Watts best win after that fight was against a guy that was 22-6 which isnt bad. But the rest of the guys could only be considered moderate fighters at best. The Worm was similar in that he could only beat moderate fighters after the beating Hagler. So does this mean that Hagler was not worthy of the title shot that he was given because of having hard fights against these 2 guys?
Rockin'
Rockin'
Comment