Comments Thread For: Lomachenko's Manager Responds Back To Team Rigondeaux

[j.razor]

Kovalev is older than Ward. Otherwise, people were right. Kovalev won about 14 of the 20 rounds they fought despite getting fouled incessantly, clinched, and fatigued from cheating. He scored the only knockdown of their two fights, and dominated the early rounds of both their fights before the fouls took their toll. When both fighters were fresh, it was no contest, and Kovalev would have been much fresher in his prime compared to 34. Ward also appeared to be on major PEDs for the second fight, but still could not win without cheating. If they had fought with neutral referees and competent drug testing, the predictions of Kovalev by KO would have been spot on.

Instead Ward somehow gains almost 10 pounds of muscle in 7 months all while having huge pimples all over his back suddenly at the age of 33, as if he'd just hit puberty. I know you're not an idiot so you do the math. Argue Kovalev is also on PEDs if you want, hell you'd probably be right they probably all are, but don't argue Ward wasn't because it looked ****ing obvious. But if Kovalev was using, he definitely wasn't on that grade A American **** it looked like Ward was on that appeared so strong it put acne all over Ward's back and let him add so much muscle so fast while still making weight and without losing speed or stamina. That's some grade A ****!

At this point, thanks to his enhancements, Ward is a bigger light heavyweight than Sergey Kovalev. Is Rigondeaux going to be a bigger junior lightweight than Lomachenko? No, so you can't even compare.

PS. People were a lot more right about Kovalev doing well against Ward than all the people who picked Walters to beat Lomachenko just because Walters is black. So don't act like Lomachenko fans are always wrong, and Lomachenko haters are always right. At least when we're wrong, it's because corruption took place that changed what would have happened in the fight. With Lomachenko-Walters, the people who picked Walters were just wrong, flat out, could not have been any more wrong, and it had nothing to do with outside factors, just them being wrong. That's a lot different.

Dude, you have NO boxing logic.

[SugarRaRobinson]

Kovalev is older than Ward. Otherwise, people were right. Kovalev won about 14 of the 20 rounds they fought despite getting fouled incessantly, clinched, and fatigued from cheating. He scored the only knockdown of their two fights, and dominated the early rounds of both their fights before the fouls took their toll. When both fighters were fresh, it was no contest, and Kovalev would have been much fresher in his prime compared to 34. Ward also appeared to be on major PEDs for the second fight, but still could not win without cheating. If they had fought with neutral referees and competent drug testing, the predictions of Kovalev by KO would have been spot on.

Instead Ward somehow gains almost 10 pounds of muscle in 7 months all while having huge pimples all over his back suddenly at the age of 33, as if he'd just hit puberty. I know you're not an idiot so you do the math. Argue Kovalev is also on PEDs if you want, hell you'd probably be right they probably all are, but don't argue Ward wasn't because it looked ****ing obvious. But if Kovalev was using, he definitely wasn't on that grade A American **** it looked like Ward was on that appeared so strong it put acne all over Ward's back and let him add so much muscle so fast while still making weight and without losing speed or stamina. That's some grade A ****!

At this point, thanks to his enhancements, Ward is a bigger light heavyweight than Sergey Kovalev. Is Rigondeaux going to be a bigger junior lightweight than Lomachenko? No, so you can't even compare.

PS. People were a lot more right about Kovalev doing well against Ward than all the people who picked Walters to beat Lomachenko just because Walters is black. So don't act like Lomachenko fans are always wrong, and Lomachenko haters are always right. At least when we're wrong, it's because corruption took place that changed what would have happened in the fight. With Lomachenko-Walters, the people who picked Walters were just wrong, flat out, could not have been any more wrong, and it had nothing to do with outside factors, just them being wrong. That's a lot different.

If conjecture, BS and supposition were nutrient rich, I have no doubt you'd cure world hunger.

[GhostofDempsey]

Loma doesn't need Rigo to further his career. His star is rising. Meanwhile, Rigo has been a pro for 8 years, twice as long as Loma and he still hasn't caught the attention of the general public or casual fanbase. Rigo needs Loma or a fight with Davis or Russell Jr. He is sulking in obscurity and his last "win" was a cheap shot after the bell. Not looking good for Rigo if he doesn't ger a big name this year. The ship is passing you by.

[Rezz]

These guys are almost even in skills and boxing accomplishments. For me this would be the fight of the decade.

[Snoop Frog]

Rigo is a small 122 and would be tiny for 130, but hopefully the weight drain for Loma would offset that. Would love to see this fight. If Rigo beats Loma, that would silence the critics.

[-Kev-]

I was just wondering why you are so negative when it comes to certain fighters.
What for instance do team Lomachenko supposed to say?
I'm in the dark myself.
So when someone calls someone's bluff, what is supposed to happen next? Do you expect them to do more? Like what?
Do fighters normally go out of their way and make the fight happen when someone calls them out?
What is the standard?

I just find it weird that you're able to babysit the posts you don't like, but conveniently ignore posts like this from 1 day prior to you saying i'm biased.

Lomachenko's career is exciting to follow. He should fight Salido or just move up 135. I'd like to see him become the man at 130 first though.

Do I get white cool points for that^?

What's the standard? I give my opinion on individual situations, i'm not a fanboy. I can say I like watching Lomachenko one day, and call his manager a backtracking hoe the next day. I can say Floyd Mayweather Jr is the best fighter of his time one week, then the next week say Mayweather vs McGregor is a **** fight that I won't even stream and it shouldn't be supported. I don't care what member wants to nitpick my posts to say i'm biased. I comment about what I think about the situation and dudes from both sides will get mad due to my inconsistency of not being a ball licking hoe to one race of fighters.

I got dudes like Kigali on one side replying to me by dissing white fighters when I make a post that isn't sucking off a black fighter, thinking i'm white or something, and then I got you occasionally coming out of the blue talking about i'm biased to black fighters. Wtf is wrong with you people?

[-PBP-]

I just find it weird that you're able to babysit the posts you don't like, but conveniently ignore posts like this from 1 day prior to you saying i'm biased.



Do I get white cool points for that^?

What's the standard? I give my opinion on individual situations, i'm not a fanboy. I can say I like watching Lomachenko one day, and call his manager a backtracking hoe the next day. I can say Floyd Mayweather Jr is the best fighter of his time one week, then the next week say Mayweather vs McGregor is a **** fight that I won't even stream and it shouldn't be supported. I don't care what member wants to nitpick my posts to say i'm biased. I comment about what I think about the situation and dudes from both sides will get mad due to my inconsistency of not being a ball licking hoe to one race of fighters.

I got dudes like Kigali on one side replying to me by dissing white fighters when I make a post that isn't sucking off a black fighter, thinking i'm white or something, and then I got you occasionally coming out of the blue talking about i'm biased to black fighters. Wtf is wrong with you people?

Bunch of clowns on this website. You show love to "white" fighters it gets ignored. You criticize a white fighter you are a racist fanboy. Just another day on NSB.

[-Kev-]

Bunch of clowns on this website. You show love to "white" fighters it gets ignored. You criticize a white fighter you are a racist fanboy. Just another day on NSB.

Lol.

I feel like i'm being monitored and I have to choose a flag/color out here or get dealt with.

[4truth]

Loma dares Rigo to come to 130, then suddenly Loma's manager turns around says, "I have nothing to do with it, talk to Top Rank"...

The fight was on the table for years at 126...Rigo, supposedly, didn't like Arum's offer. So yes, all Loma's camp can say is "Yes", after that it's up to the promoter to make it happen...or not

[j.razor]

Exactly. Contracts do not get made on twitter. Contact the people who make the fights.

They tried that already & saying Rigo didn't want to fight but the fact was that they tried to low-ball Rigo (just like bob always does to get out of negotiations) so now they are putting them on blast to the public...why do you have a problem with that? Are you saying this fight shouldn't get made?