Tweet
Kovalev is older than Ward. Otherwise, people were right. Kovalev won about 14 of the 20 rounds they fought despite getting fouled incessantly, clinched, and fatigued from cheating. He scored the only knockdown of their two fights, and dominated the early rounds of both their fights before the fouls took their toll. When both fighters were fresh, it was no contest, and Kovalev would have been much fresher in his prime compared to 34. Ward also appeared to be on major PEDs for the second fight, but still could not win without cheating. If they had fought with neutral referees and competent drug testing, the predictions of Kovalev by KO would have been spot on.
Instead Ward somehow gains almost 10 pounds of muscle in 7 months all while having huge pimples all over his back suddenly at the age of 33, as if he'd just hit puberty. I know you're not an idiot so you do the math. Argue Kovalev is also on PEDs if you want, hell you'd probably be right they probably all are, but don't argue Ward wasn't because it looked ****ing obvious. But if Kovalev was using, he definitely wasn't on that grade A American **** it looked like Ward was on that appeared so strong it put acne all over Ward's back and let him add so much muscle so fast while still making weight and without losing speed or stamina. That's some grade A ****!
At this point, thanks to his enhancements, Ward is a bigger light heavyweight than Sergey Kovalev. Is Rigondeaux going to be a bigger junior lightweight than Lomachenko? No, so you can't even compare.
PS. People were a lot more right about Kovalev doing well against Ward than all the people who picked Walters to beat Lomachenko just because Walters is black. So don't act like Lomachenko fans are always wrong, and Lomachenko haters are always right. At least when we're wrong, it's because corruption took place that changed what would have happened in the fight. With Lomachenko-Walters, the people who picked Walters were just wrong, flat out, could not have been any more wrong, and it had nothing to do with outside factors, just them being wrong. That's a lot different.
Instead Ward somehow gains almost 10 pounds of muscle in 7 months all while having huge pimples all over his back suddenly at the age of 33, as if he'd just hit puberty. I know you're not an idiot so you do the math. Argue Kovalev is also on PEDs if you want, hell you'd probably be right they probably all are, but don't argue Ward wasn't because it looked ****ing obvious. But if Kovalev was using, he definitely wasn't on that grade A American **** it looked like Ward was on that appeared so strong it put acne all over Ward's back and let him add so much muscle so fast while still making weight and without losing speed or stamina. That's some grade A ****!
At this point, thanks to his enhancements, Ward is a bigger light heavyweight than Sergey Kovalev. Is Rigondeaux going to be a bigger junior lightweight than Lomachenko? No, so you can't even compare.
PS. People were a lot more right about Kovalev doing well against Ward than all the people who picked Walters to beat Lomachenko just because Walters is black. So don't act like Lomachenko fans are always wrong, and Lomachenko haters are always right. At least when we're wrong, it's because corruption took place that changed what would have happened in the fight. With Lomachenko-Walters, the people who picked Walters were just wrong, flat out, could not have been any more wrong, and it had nothing to do with outside factors, just them being wrong. That's a lot different.
They tried that already & saying Rigo didn't want to fight but the fact was that they tried to low-ball Rigo (just like bob always does to get out of negotiations) so now they are putting them on blast to the public...why do you have a problem with that? Are you saying this fight shouldn't get made?
Comment