Let me give you an idea on how great Roy Jones Jr really was

[Vadrigar.]

Was 2001-2003 worse than 1993 Hopkins?

When was Hopkins in his athletic prime, 2001-2003 or 1993?

[Mister Wolf]

Hopkins was in his prime. Prime is mid-late twenties to early thirties for generally all athletic sports.

[ghost94]

Who gives a fcuk? Look at the fighter and forget all that bull****. Hopkins looked great against bums and smaller guys moving up but the truth is he was in his prime against Jones.

Looking at the fighter that's not prime Hopkins and when Roy beat Hill that was no all-time top 10 light heavyweight and Hill never looked as good as Ward in his whole career.

[McNulty]

Looking at the fighter that's not prime Hopkins and when Roy beat Hill that was no all-time top 10 light heavyweight and Hill never looked as good as Ward in his whole career.

Hopkins was in his prime, stfu and quit talking out the side of your neck. You're just a couch fan that never did shiht in the game and probably old enough to be my son.

[ghost94]

Hopkins was in his prime, stfu and quit talking out the side of your neck. You're just a couch fan that never did shiht in the game and probably old enough to be my son.

Don't get angry. Your opinions are welcome.

[McNulty]

Don't get angry. Your opinions are welcome.

Its not an opinion, its a fact. There is a total difference.

[BattlingNelson]

He wasn't on steroids against Tarver.

He'd had to burn muscle just to make weight.

The guy was referring to the hall fight. The one where Jones was proven to be on roids.

[robertzimmerman]

The guy was referring to the hall fight. The one where Jones was proven to be on roids.

No problem, I misread the post.

[Chollo Vista]

The guy was referring to the hall fight. The one where Jones was proven to be on roids.

Jones was never proven to be on steroids. Stop lying.