Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GGG destroys Canelo Alvarez "Why did he not knock Chavez out"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
    'They' (his team) publically ducked the fight. It was a known thing at the time. Maybe Sergio would not have strayed away from the fight but who knows.

    Live with it.

    Sergio fought Cotto instead. It's well known that he wanted no part of prime GGG. His team saved him from a brutal KO and got one anyways.

    He was ducked and nothing you will say or go back, find and post will erase actual history.
    Awwww, sergio made money fighting a future HOFer instead of fighting a bum beater, I know that must've been a real blow to Sergio, I mean, who wouldn't dream of a 97k ppv fight? Lmao!

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
      That WW's career at the top is over as a result of taking that fight. How is that exposing GGG exactly?

      Dream on. You're just a hater, deal with that.
      So what you're saying is the 'supposed' best mw in the world who's best win was against B level Jacobs, is now a great because he fought the 'supposed' top WW (remember your math now...13 lbs right?) who also has his biggest win against also a B level WW...so that's his claim to fame? Oh and remember Spence is the one who messed up the other eye, so who's actually overrated? Oh yeah, and who looked worse after their fights with Brook? You're pathetic.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Kim Jong-Un View Post


        Straight ether, GGG basically punks on Canelo so damn bad
        Sheit, the man got tired. He hit that Mofo with everything but the kitchen sink and yet he was still eating them and kept standing.

        Undoubtedly, Alvarez, would have easily run the risk of breaking his hand, had he continued to press for a knockout victory over JCC, Jr.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
          Dude was a gimp when he said that and then lost to Cotto. But the best version of Martinez is better than Golovkin...
          I disagree. Cotto didn't win only on Martinez's lack of mobility.

          I think best for best, GGG annihilates Martinez. Respectfully.

          I think Martinez was a good fighter but he was a flash in the pan and GGG obliterated a guy he struggled with in Murray. No comparison.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
            I disagree. Cotto didn't win only on Martinez's lack of mobility.

            I think best for best, GGG annihilates Martinez. Respectfully.

            I think Martinez was a good fighter but he was a flash in the pan and GGG obliterated a guy he struggled with in Murray. No comparison.
            You're a Golovkin troll

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
              You're a Golovkin troll
              Lol, trolls seek other bozo's, I have simply replied to others ignorant comments. That's not being a troll by definition chief.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post
                So what you're saying is the 'supposed' best mw in the world who's best win was against B level Jacobs, is now a great because he fought the 'supposed' top WW (remember your math now...13 lbs right?) who also has his biggest win against also a B level WW...so that's his claim to fame? Oh and remember Spence is the one who messed up the other eye, so who's actually overrated? Oh yeah, and who looked worse after their fights with Brook? You're pathetic.
                You do realize that the Brook that fought Spence was nowhere near the guy who got knocked out by GGG right? It's so obvious that the guy's prime was shortened. His reflexes were shot. If you don't believe me, go look at how labored his punches were in the Spence fight as opposed to the fights before GGG. It's night and day. The punches didn't flow and he has to wind up to throw hard shots.

                And I never said GGG was great but if he unifies the division on top of setting the MW title fight defense record, he will be HOF, easily.

                If you can't see that you're flat ****** on top of being an established hater.

                Back on topic, why don't you like GGG?

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                  You do realize that the Brook that fought Spence was nowhere near the guy who got knocked out by GGG right? It's so obvious that the guy's prime was shortened. His reflexes were shot. If you don't believe me, go look at how labored his punches were in the Spence fight as opposed to the fights before GGG. It's night and day. The punches didn't flow and he has to wind up to throw hard shots.

                  And I never said GGG was great but if he unifies the division on top of setting the MW title fight defense record, he will be HOF, easily.

                  If you can't see that you're flat ****** on top of being an established hater.

                  Back on topic, why don't you like GGG?
                  Ok, he's the "he wasn't the best Brook" and the other bs.

                  I've already explained why I don't like him, I don't really need to explain any further.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post
                    Awwww, sergio made money fighting a future HOFer instead of fighting a bum beater, I know that must've been a real blow to Sergio, I mean, who wouldn't dream of a 97k ppv fight? Lmao!
                    It under performed anyways at 350k buys.

                    Call it what it was, a chance to win and make more money. There's no shame in it, but don't say it wasn't a duck when it was, clearly.

                    GGG was the no.1 contender and Martinez didn't fight him on purpose. Neither did Cotto. End of story.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post
                      Ok, he's the "he wasn't the best Brook" and the other bs.

                      I've already explained why I don't like him, I don't really need to explain any further.
                      You haven't explained it at all and that's the point. You don't like him because of his race and where he's from. Deny that and you're a liar.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP