In reality Pulev kind of forfeited his mandatory position when he refused to take the fight last November/December which would have avoided this whole situation!
Comments Thread For: Joshua Could Lose IBF Belt Prior To Klitschko II, Pulev Stands Firm
Collapse
-
-
I can certainly understand this situation better then the Indongo situation from the IBF's POV, but there's more money in Klitschko then Pulev so this is what it is, rightly or wrongly, at this level of the game.Comment
-
Comment
-
Fury/klitchko wasn't the biggest fight out there the first was dog**** I can't remember many who were looking forward to the rematch. I wanted to see fury go on and fight wilder after.Comment
-
Why does Juiceua prefer to fight Klitschko, instead of Ortiz or Pulev? Because he'd earn more money, win, lose or draw. Why shouldn't other fighters look for the biggest financial upside as well?Comment
-
I understand that there's more money in a Klitschko rematch. He can do it if he wants, but the IBF are in the right for taking the title from him if he does.Comment
-
No he didn't. Since it's all nothing personal but business, he could've taken the fight with three months of preparation or wait it our for a year and a half, when he's the mandatory or the IBF champion fighting for a unification and make ten-twenty times more than the peanuts Hearn was offering him.
Why does Juiceua prefer to fight Klitschko, instead of Ortiz or Pulev? Because he'd earn more money, win, lose or draw. Why shouldn't other fighters look for the biggest financial upside as well?
Also why are you saying three months of preparation as if that isn't enough? that's plenty of time for a training camp.Comment
Comment