Please Explain How Canelo Is More Skilled Than GGG? LMAO

[Joe Beamish]

Better head movement, defense, counter-punching, and speed off the top of my head. It'll be a great fight for boxing.

The same list of superior skills that every opponent of Golovkin's has had since God knows when.

[icha]

lol You are so lame. Who are you trying to convince?

It was 7-5 canelo. Canelo was so bad that fight. I knew right after that fight that he was gonna get schooled by floyd. Trout also said after the fight he thought he won. Who cares what fighters say. Canelo almost lost to freakin trout, and most people think he lost against lara. Dont be so dumb

7-5 vs a prime undefeated trout wasnt bad at all for a green lesser version of canelo, charlo had about the same result(minus the kd) vs a past prime trout...

[Combat Talk Radio]

[IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/a0Ai2XveNErGo/200.gif[/IMG]

[IMG]https://media0.*****.com/media/8wIfJ5zOeZXS8/200.gif[/IMG]

[IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/IesMLTbeNCIc8/200.gif[/IMG]



You see movement, handspeed and counterpunching like that from GGG? Slipping shots and simultaneously landing blazing counters?

Save your breath. Cats don't understand just how talented the man is in the ring - second only to TBE.

Don't even get me started on the highlight reel uppercuts against Angulo

[muslimer12]

7-5 vs a prime undefeated trout wasnt bad at all for a green lesser version of canelo, charlo had about the same result(minus the kd) vs a past prime trout...

Not really, at the time it looked pretty bad, and even Skip Bayless, floyds biggest hater, said after he saw that fight that floyd was gonna destroy him. Dont try and rewrite history lol

[SeekDaGreat]

Do you watch boxing? LMAO.

[icha]

Not really, at the time it looked pretty bad, and even Skip Bayless, floyds biggest hater, said after he saw that fight that floyd was gonna destroy him. Dont try and rewrite history lol

Who said it was a bad fight for canelo?? Care to show some links???
Again a past prime version of trout gave charlo hell, canelo was only 22 when he fought trout and has improved a lot since then...

[muslimer12]

Who said it was a bad fight for canelo?? Care to show some links???
Again a past prime version of trout gave charlo hell, canelo was only 22 when he fought trout and has improved a lot since then...

Dont know how to post links, but watch the start of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPyXBMA4iO8

too laazy to find the full video, but skip after watching canelo trout was so convinced that floyd would school canelo easily. And skip is floyds biggest hater. Trust me man that fight made canelo look a lot worse, it was not good by any measure at all. Thankfully canelo improved, cuz he was so bad that fight.

[icha]

Dont know how to post links, but watch the start of this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPyXBMA4iO8

too laazy to find the full video, but skip after watching canelo trout was so convinced that floyd would school canelo easily. And skip is floyds biggest hater. Trust me man that fight made canelo look a lot worse, it was not good by any measure at all. Thankfully canelo improved, cuz he was so bad that fight.

Skip also said that McGregor beats floyd in a boxing match, thats how much boxing he knows, do you have examples of real boxing analyst saying canelo-trout was a bad fight for the young red kid???

[elfag]

better defense, better movement, faster hands, quicker reflexes

[elfag]

Skip also said that McGregor beats floyd in a boxing match, thats how much boxing he knows, do you have examples of real boxing analyst saying canelo-trout was a bad fight for the young red kid???

those epsn phaggots dont know **** about boxing. best get back to covering nfl and golf. They always say the cheesiest and dumbest chit when it comes to boxing, no idea what they are talking about.