Tyson Fury to attend Anti-Doping hearing

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JimRaynor
    Lieutenant
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 8769
    • 1,852
    • 1,163
    • 1,631,497

    #21
    Originally posted by denium
    Your banter is ****. Obviously your gonna back your bum boy up. Now go and eat a ****.
    You're a schmuck, your computer is trash, your internet connection is ****, and your boy Tyson Fury is a potato sack waiting to get knocked out by someone who isn't 40 years old. Joshua and or Wilder will spark him out with his PED cheating fat potato sack body, that probably resembles yours as well.

    Comment

    • 1hourRun
      SQUAD-UP!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 20526
      • 2,789
      • 2,336
      • 140,312

      #22
      Originally posted by soul_survivor
      According to Warren, Fury's first offense was swearing at the people that came to collect samples. Then he tested positive for ******* and was banned. What is this hearing about? The first or second offense? As both seem to be problematic.

      Anyway, I'm sure Fury will have his license allowed and he will fight once or twice before fighting AJ. Or at least, I hope he fights AJ.
      Abusing VADA agents, testing positive for *******, testing positive for a steroid ( nandrolone ), breach of contract against Klitsckho....wow! and they are going to reinstate this maniac's license? only in the UK, thanks UKAD.

      Comment

      • soul_survivor
        LOL @ Ali-Holmes
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2013
        • 18949
        • 623
        • 473
        • 65,236

        #23
        Originally posted by 1hourRun
        Abusing VADA agents, testing positive for *******, testing positive for a steroid ( nandrolone ), breach of contract against Klitsckho....wow! and they are going to reinstate this maniac's license? only in the UK, thanks UKAD.
        He had trace amounts of nandrolone in one sample, while the other tested positive for it. He was given a warning and allowed to continue to fight Wlad. That will not be reflective of the hearings.

        Comment

        • 1hourRun
          SQUAD-UP!
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2010
          • 20526
          • 2,789
          • 2,336
          • 140,312

          #24
          Originally posted by soul_survivor
          He had trace amounts of nandrolone in one sample, while the other tested positive for it. He was given a warning and allowed to continue to fight Wlad. That will not be reflective of the hearings.
          No official statement from UKAD regarding the specific amount of the nandro has been made public as its still going to trial, last time I checked it was abnormally high amounts but if you ask Team Fluff they been mitigating the quantity...I rather wait on the evidence obviously it was enough to get suspended.

          Comment

          • soul_survivor
            LOL @ Ali-Holmes
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 18949
            • 623
            • 473
            • 65,236

            #25
            Originally posted by 1hourRun
            No official statement from UKAD regarding the specific amount of the nandro has been made public as its still going to trial, last time I checked it was abnormally high amounts but if you ask Team Fluff they been mitigating the quantity...I rather wait on the evidence obviously it was enough to get suspended.
            I'm just going off of what Warren said. If UKAD havent released numbers, how did you check what the amount was?

            Comment

            • 1hourRun
              SQUAD-UP!
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 20526
              • 2,789
              • 2,336
              • 140,312

              #26
              Originally posted by soul_survivor
              I'm just going off of what Warren said. If UKAD havent released numbers, how did you check what the amount was?
              My initial reply answers this question : I never said I knew the amount : In my last reply I said it was obviously over the limit to issue a ban...and lastly like I said in my last reply - team Fury are obviously not going to incriminate Fluff and will tell the media what favors them in the publics view.

              Comment

              • kafkod
                I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 24862
                • 2,212
                • 1,826
                • 405,373

                #27
                Originally posted by soul_survivor
                According to Warren, Fury's first offense was swearing at the people that came to collect samples. Then he tested positive for ******* and was banned. What is this hearing about? The first or second offense? As both seem to be problematic.

                Anyway, I'm sure Fury will have his license allowed and he will fight once or twice before fighting AJ. Or at least, I hope he fights AJ.
                This hearing is into the UKAD test taken back in March 2015.

                Fury tested positive for coke in a VADA test, so it won't figure in this hearing.

                Comment

                • kafkod
                  I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 24862
                  • 2,212
                  • 1,826
                  • 405,373

                  #28
                  Originally posted by soul_survivor
                  He had trace amounts of nandrolone in one sample, while the other tested positive for it. He was given a warning and allowed to continue to fight Wlad. That will not be reflective of the hearings.
                  If I remember right, what Warren said was a low amount of nandrolone, just above the permitted level, in one sample and nothing in the other. We'll find out soon, I hope.

                  Comment

                  • iamboxing
                    ******a facking game
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2016
                    • 6421
                    • 672
                    • 760
                    • 29,458

                    #29

                    Comment

                    • iamboxing
                      ******a facking game
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2016
                      • 6421
                      • 672
                      • 760
                      • 29,458

                      #30
                      It's 7pm now in the UK, so we'll get the results soon.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP