Tyson Fury to attend Anti-Doping hearing

[soul_survivor]

If I remember right, what Warren said was a low amount of nandrolone, just above the permitted level, in one sample and nothing in the other. We'll find out soon, I hope.

yeah excatly, I was supposed to write negative lol

[soul_survivor]

My initial reply answers this question : I never said I knew the amount : In my last reply I said it was obviously over the limit to issue a ban...and lastly like I said in my last reply - team Fury are obviously not going to incriminate Fluff and will tell the media what favors them in the publics view.

so you cant speculate as to the amount. My post is about what Warren has said and I tend to believe him with regards to the nandralone because they let the fight with Wlad go ahead (one sample came back negative). The other issues are a separate problem.

[Kigali]

I'm just going off of what Warren said. If UKAD havent released numbers, how did you check what the amount was?

Only a fool does that.

[soul_survivor]

This hearing is into the UKAD test taken back in March 2015.

Fury tested positive for coke in a VADA test, so it won't figure in this hearing.

oh...ok, so why is UKAD having a hearing on that 2 years later, even though they let the Wlad fight take place? Veru weird. I'll read up on the report in a day or 2.

[1hourRun]

so you cant speculate as to the amount. My post is about what Warren has said and I tend to believe him with regards to the nandralone because they let the fight with Wlad go ahead (one sample came back negative). The other issues are a separate problem.

I'm going off facts - he was banned for nandro. You can believe Frank Warren all you want but I doubt he has a B.S in chemistry or personally overseeing Tysons defense. I'll leave it there, I dont make excuses for any fighter including my favorites ; if they get busted ****'m.

[soul_survivor]

I'm going off facts - he was banned for nandro. You can believe Frank Warren all you want but I doubt he has a B.S in chemistry or personally overseeing Tysons defense. I'll leave it there, I dont make excuses for any fighter including my favorites ; if they get busted ****'m.

This is what you said "last time I checked it was abnormally high amounts".

As you yourself stated, no one know the actual amount, so why did you make that statement? That was the only thing I asked.

My point is very simple, Warren states Tyson Fury tested only slightly above the limit in one sample and negative in the other. That is the reason he was given a warning and allowed to fight Wlad. I don't see any contradiction with that. The current hearing may or may not be about that issue. I do not know.

But it is not up to any of us to state what Fury had in his system since we do not know.

I've always advocated strong bans for any fighter testing positive for any banned substances but the law has to be imposed properly and without all this cloak and dagger rubbish. Tests positive 2 years ago but the hearing is only just happening now? Do we even know if the hearing is about nandrolone or the cocain or how Fury respnded to the VADA agents? We do not know any of that, so to try and say he should be banned for something you have no clue about is not an informed opinion.