So both of y'all gonna ignore Wilder was supposed up fight Povetkin in January 2016 but Povetkin team asked for a delay. Then they scheduled the fight for May & Povetkin tested positive for PED's. Then the WBC gave him another chance to become the mandatory by fighting Stiverne and he tested positive again. So now they've ordered Stiverne vs Wilder if Parker or Joshua won't fight Wilder, which they won't.
Comments Thread For: Pulev's Promoter Does Not Believe Anthony Joshua Will Vacate
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Wilder vs Joshua will never happen. If, if it did wilder would be carried out on a stretcherMy issue with you is this, since you're clearly oblivious to the facts, so wilder was traveling overseas to face Povetkin, who then tested positive for banned substance, they went to court to dispute the evidence of Povetkin, so they gave wilder a voluntary defense while they investigated the dopping allegation against the Russian, then after that they set it up between Povetkin vs Stervine to decide who would be Wilder's mandatory instead of suspending Povetkin, & he tested positive in the lead up to that fight, which made stervine his mandatory and wilder & boxing fans would rather him face someone else than stervine, someone he shut out for 12 rounds... it's not rocket science if you've been following the fight game, just stop hating & be patient he will KO everyone soon enoughComment
-
Lmfao, right the guy who has never been down, will be taken off on stretcher by a guy, who was almost stopped by a 41 yr old who was coming off a loss to fury & a 17 month layoff, get the f**k out of here, you're just talking nonsenseComment
-
Hmmm so what exactly are you saying? Wilder is better than this version of Wlad?
Based on what?Comment
-
Youth alone, you guys are definitely overhyping this win over Wlad, lets look at some facts, Klitschko is 41 yrs old, lost his fight before this (fury), had a 17 month layoff & no tune up fight, & came out there dropped Joshua (almost stopped him) & was winning until Joshua got his second wind and pulled it off.... Wilder has a longer reach than Klitschko and his straight right (the punch Klitschko landed) is a lot more dangerous and if wilder was in there in the 6th when Joshua went down instead of a 41 yr old who is pass him prime, he would've stopped Joshua, but you guys will see soon enoughLast edited by M1LWAUK33BUCK; 05-07-2017, 10:54 AM.Comment
-
Yeah, let's look at some facts: Wilder has fought literally nobody as good as Joshua and Klitschko. In fact, he only fought one decent opponent (who's not even in the same stratosphere as the two mentioned above). And he didn't knock him out.Youth alone, you guys are definitely overhyping this win over Wlad, lets look at some facts, Klitschko is 41 yrs old, lost his fight before this (fury), had a 17 month layoff & no tune up fight, & came out there dropped Joshua (almost stopped him) & was winning until Joshua got his second wind and pulled it off.... Wilder has a longer reach than Klitschko and his straight right (the punch Klitschko landed) is a lot more dangerous and if wilder was in there in the 6th when Joshua went down instead of a 41 yr old who is pass him prime, he would've stopped Joshua, but you guys will see soon enough
His youth and reach would mean something if he had Wlad's experience and tools (such as timing and accuracy) to utilize them but he doesn't. You can see his right hand coming from a mile away. It has worked so far against the subpar opposition he's been fighting but it won't against the top dogs.
He could be 18 years old for all I care, thanks to his careful matchmaking, he's a 31 year old belt holder who's had 38 fights as a pro and yet, you could still call him a prospect.
His balance is terrible, so is his footwork. His ring IQ and the ability to adjust is very low as he struggles with almost every opponent he's supposed knock out relatively easy. There are many question marks surrounding this guy which is hilarious considering the amount of fights on his record.
To suggest that Wilder would have beaten AJ in that fight because 'a 41 year old Wlad almost did' is disrespectful to the former kingpin of the division and basically shows that YDKSAB.Comment
-
Lmfao All of you guys are brainwashed, Joshua just fought Klitschko, that's the only name on his resume and that happened in April.... wilder had the only title Klitschko didn't own before he fought fury.. yet never wanted to fight wilder. He ducked him.. & if all of that non sense you just said about wilder is true how come nobody is 1. calling him out or 2. Seriously pushing to get him in the ring... and don't say no nonsense like he's a nobody.. he's a champion.. it's ducking season Joshua will beg Klitschko for a rematch or fight pulev and vacate the WBA to avoid Ortiz... enjoy Joshua v. pulevYeah, let's look at some facts: Wilder has fought literally nobody as good as Joshua and Klitschko. In fact, he only fought one decent opponent (who's not even in the same stratosphere as the two mentioned above). And he didn't knock him out.
His youth and reach would mean something if he had Wlad's experience and tools (such as timing and accuracy) to utilize them but he doesn't. You can see his right hand coming from a mile away. It has worked so far against the subpar opposition he's been fighting but it won't against the top dogs.
He could be 18 years old for all I care, thanks to his careful matchmaking, he's a 31 year old belt holder who's had 38 fights as a pro and yet, you could still call him a prospect.
His balance is terrible, so is his footwork. His ring IQ and the ability to adjust is very low as he struggles with almost every opponent he's supposed knock out relatively easy. There are many question marks surrounding this guy which is hilarious considering the amount of fights on his record.
To suggest that Wilder would have beaten AJ in that fight because 'a 41 year old Wlad almost did' is disrespectful to the former kingpin of the division and basically shows that YDKSAB.Comment
-
Don't worry, wilder isn't ****** enough to take that fight. He'll just keep fighting unranked bums.Comment
-
False. Going by the rules of the fight. There was a Meldonium limit set. Povetkin did not exceed that.Hahaha there isn't a legal limit for Meldonium you idiot, it's a banned substance any trace will result in a failure, do your research before you open your mouth and tell ppl the wrong information, povetkin was found with a small trace (which is true) & but if it was under the limit & he didn't exceed it... why did the organization who tested them, make it known that povetkin failed.. stop lyingComment

Comment