Comments Thread For: Pulev's Promoter Does Not Believe Anthony Joshua Will Vacate

[vitali1999]

Because Wilder's mandatory tested positive for a banned substance....

Yes and WBC has a fight a mandatory once a year policy as does the IBF. Last time I checked wilder won the paper title January 2015. Which means he should have fought 2 mandatories by now. But it's OK. Povetkin tested positive for a banned substance so wilder never ever has to fight a mandatory

[LoveWisdomTruth]

Pulev does not have a knock out punching power. His left hand is much weaker than his right, he lacks precision too. If Pulev survives 12 rounds against Joshua consider it a "victory" for him, it is a win for him to not be knocked out. (I think Joshua will beat him without much difficulties.)

[Arthur Daley]

Because Wilder's mandatory tested positive for a banned substance....

Technically Povetkin wasn't over the illegal amount for the Wilder fight. It was a joke the fight didn't go ahead. He didn't actually fail that test.

[sir ronni james]

to tell the truth, the headline must be: pulevs promoter does not HOPE he vacates

[goldenbear]

Pulev will just test positive again......

Until Pulev can prove he has what it takes without being juiced up I'm skeptical the fight even occurs. It tells me he lacks the confidence to face the best without cheating. Will Pulev really fight AJ without the needle I doubt it.

[Boxing Truth]

Technically Povetkin wasn't over the illegal amount for the Wilder fight. It was a joke the fight didn't go ahead. He didn't actually fail that test.

That is true. It was minuscule amounts, trace amounts that amounted to a cup of coffee with no PED effects. Wilder just wasn't going to fight the guy no matter what. Biggest coward fraud of all time.

[Boxing Truth]

Until Pulev can prove he has what it takes without being juiced up I'm skeptical the fight even occurs. It tells me he lacks the confidence to face the best without cheating. Will Pulev really fight AJ without the needle I doubt it.

When did Pulev test positive? Never! You living sack of crap.

[M1LWAUK33BUCK]

Yes and WBC has a fight a mandatory once a year policy as does the IBF. Last time I checked wilder won the paper title January 2015. Which means he should have fought 2 mandatories by now. But it's OK. Povetkin tested positive for a banned substance so wilder never ever has to fight a mandatory

My issue with you is this, since you're clearly oblivious to the facts, so wilder was traveling overseas to face Povetkin, who then tested positive for banned substance, they went to court to dispute the evidence of Povetkin, so they gave wilder a voluntary defense while they investigated the dopping allegation against the Russian, then after that they set it up between Povetkin vs Stervine to decide who would be Wilder's mandatory instead of suspending Povetkin, & he tested positive in the lead up to that fight, which made stervine his mandatory and wilder & boxing fans would rather him face someone else than stervine, someone he shut out for 12 rounds... it's not rocket science if you've been following the fight game, just stop hating & be patient he will KO everyone soon enough

[M1LWAUK33BUCK]

That is true. It was minuscule amounts, trace amounts that amounted to a cup of coffee with no PED effects. Wilder just wasn't going to fight the guy no matter what. Biggest coward fraud of all time.

This not true smh, The fact that you're calling someone who wasn't going to get in the ring, in a sport that can end your life against some who is clearly cheating (shouldn't matter the amount), is ridiculous.... smfh, I want you to go out and find someone using steriods and fight them lmfao

[M1LWAUK33BUCK]

Technically Povetkin wasn't over the illegal amount for the Wilder fight. It was a joke the fight didn't go ahead. He didn't actually fail that test.

Hahaha there isn't a legal limit for Meldonium you idiot, it's a banned substance any trace will result in a failure, do your research before you open your mouth and tell ppl the wrong information, povetkin was found with a small trace (which is true) & but if it was under the limit & he didn't exceed it... why did the organization who tested them, make it known that povetkin failed.. stop lying