Joshua vs Klitschko smashes PPV record - does 1.5+ million buys!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LacedUp
    Still Smokin'
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 29171
    • 781
    • 381
    • 132,163

    #1

    Joshua vs Klitschko smashes PPV record - does 1.5+ million buys!

    If this is true, it's an extraordinary feat.

    Imagine what a Fury vs Joshua fight would do.




  • paulf
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 23699
    • 3,324
    • 2,093
    • 1,052,140

    #2
    Holy SHIT.

    Comment

    • Randall Cunning
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 6041
      • 163
      • 30
      • 84,599

      #3
      He said that a few days ago. Last thing he said yesterday sounds like its closer to 2 million https://twitter.com/EddieHearn/statu...72660954312705

      Comment

      • g27region
        IKSAB
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2016
        • 2483
        • 124
        • 172
        • 23,753

        #4
        Boxing fans should appreciate that, it's a breath of fresh air for the sport that is dying for casual fanbase, according to some people, and it might be a first step for boxing to bring back the spotlight

        Comment

        • soul_survivor
          LOL @ Ali-Holmes
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2013
          • 18949
          • 623
          • 473
          • 65,236

          #5
          Originally posted by LacedUp
          If this is true, it's an extraordinary feat.

          Imagine what a Fury vs Joshua fight would do.




          http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/02/eddie-...ecord-6610635/
          First of, Hearn at no stage says he even knows what the PPV numbers are so yeah...article flop, headline bs, as usual from the tabloids and Hearn.

          Second, the number mentioned is £1.5 million...that's currency, not buy rate. Did you even bother reading the article?

          On top of al that, as far as I know, Sky have never released PPV figures and until it comes from them, there is no reason to ever believe what Hearn has to say.

          Comment

          • Beercules
            Lounge POTY '17
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Aug 2013
            • 65183
            • 4,940
            • 7,203
            • 950,179

            #6
            Damn really? That is good. Ye lads are keeping boxing alive

            Comment

            • Beercules
              Lounge POTY '17
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2013
              • 65183
              • 4,940
              • 7,203
              • 950,179

              #7
              Originally posted by g27region
              Boxing fans should appreciate that, it's a breath of fresh air for the sport that is dying for casual fanbase, according to some people, and it might be a first step for boxing to bring back the spotlight
              In the US boxing is dead. Everyone is into UFC

              Comment

              • j0zef
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 8421
                • 638
                • 767
                • 45,501

                #8
                Good news, and I definitely like Hearn's business model. Pricing PPVs at 20 pounds, even a huge fight like Wlad-AJ is very smart. Nobody wants to pay $60/70 for a US PPV anymore, thus the low numbers in the States. For 20 bux, it's a whole different ball game.

                US PPVs need to follow along with this. It's important to note that US has almost 6x the population of UK. By making the PPV lower priced, it becomes much more accessible to casual fans and should see a big surge in # of PPV purchased.

                Im simplistic terms, UK averages a purchase rate of 500K for good PPVs, out of a population of 65M people, for a buy rate of 0.77%. If US produces a similar buy rate, it would sell 2.4M PPVs (324m*0.0077).

                Comment

                • Poppo168
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 913
                  • 32
                  • 12
                  • 7,847

                  #9
                  Originally posted by soul_survivor
                  First of, Hearn at no stage says he even knows what the PPV numbers are so yeah...article flop, headline bs, as usual from the tabloids and Hearn.

                  Second, the number mentioned is £1.5 million...that's currency, not buy rate. Did you even bother reading the article?

                  On top of al that, as far as I know, Sky have never released PPV figures and until it comes from them, there is no reason to ever believe what Hearn has to say.
                  You sound pretty angry for some reason lol.

                  I think the '£1.5 million' was an error and they meant to just put 1.5 million as other media sources have had the figure without the pound sign. Otherwise that's 75,000 ppv buys which just isn't realistic at all.

                  Maybe they'll release them if they're record breaking. Eddie will probably know what the rough figure is.

                  Comment

                  • Randall Cunning
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2015
                    • 6041
                    • 163
                    • 30
                    • 84,599

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Poppo168
                    You sound pretty angry for some reason lol.

                    I think the '£1.5 million' was an error and they meant to just put 1.5 million as other media sources have had the figure without the pound sign. Otherwise that's 75,000 ppv buys which just isn't realistic at all.

                    Maybe they'll release them if they're record breaking. Eddie will probably know what the rough figure is.
                    Lol yeah Metro is a free newspaper for train travellers after all, not exactly the height of journalism

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP