He's always threw it that way just looked so bad as for once an opponent was making him miss it by a margin, AJ was well prepared.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wlads Left hook problem
Collapse
-
Credit to AJ for doing his homework and avoiding the left hook but like everyone else I was cringing when Wlad telegraphed it. Did Wlad's jab lose some snap to it as well? It really wasn't slowing AJ down at all.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by anonymous2.0 View PostDid Wlad's jab lose some snap to it as well?
He got old. I wouldn't say he was "shot" as he was still in good shape and his mind was refocused. But, just like Kovalev fans got all giddy when he beat an over the hill Hopkins, AJ fans are doing the same. It's a good win but we have to temper our excitement a bit as this was a once-great fighter at the end of his career. I love Joe Calzaghe but I'm not going to pretend he beat a prime RJJ.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slimshandy69 View PostVlad got his tactics wrong, or at 41 he didnt realise that his left hook is not as explosive as it once was.
In the pulev and povetkin fights, it was quick and times well.
In the Joshua fight, he landed two out of 20 thrown. Eating up energy.
Joshua, who has a poor defence saw the hook everytime. Wlad will regret not sticking with what got the innitial knock down, his classic 1-2.
Wlad kinda landed a left hook after Joshua was falling, then he landed a weak left hook when Joshua was on chciken legs, other than that he had a horrible sucess rate with it.
Was it a tactical error, or did Klitscko not realise how telegraphed it was in his older years?
Thoughts?
he's a HW. it only takes 1 out of 20. his left hook was honestly fine. he fought well. his gameplan was to wait for joshua to tire and pick a spot to be aggressive. it almost worked out for him. you can't fight a perfect fighw hen you're 41 and have 70 pro fights. your body just doens'tw ork liek that. he's obviosuily not as fast, explosive, quick to react as he was when he was 31, or 27.
he fought a very talented young fighter in his physical prime, one of the most talented kids in the sport. wladimir's problem is that he was 41 years old before a young, strong contender came along. i have no doubt that wladimir would beat wilder. joshua's just a combination of talent, schooling even if he's not the most experienced world champon level boxer, and the mind of a winner. the kid has a ton going for him. chin and conditioning looks good, too. most HW wladimir has hit with that right hand don't get up. these aren't welterweights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RussTBE View PostShould have thrown more uppercuts. I dont know why he throws that punch so little. The one time he threw one it rocked AJ bad.
He's a HW and for the most part they're either too far away, or tied up in close. he threw some while they were tangled up, but you can't expect a guy who throws 5 body shots all night to take the risk and get close enough to land a hard uppercut. when wladimir has gotten that close in the past 15 years he has held, and it has worked for him. the ref breaks them apart where he's always had advantages with his jab, height, punching power at arm's length. you can't expect great changes from a 41 year old fighter, it just isn't practical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View PostHe's a HW and for the most part they're either too far away, or tied up in close. he threw some while they were tangled up, but you can't expect a guy who throws 5 body shots all night to take the risk and get close enough to land a hard uppercut. when wladimir has gotten that close in the past 15 years he has held, and it has worked for him. the ref breaks them apart where he's always had advantages with his jab, height, punching power at arm's length. you can't expect great changes from a 41 year old fighter, it just isn't practical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Posthe's a HW. it only takes 1 out of 20. his left hook was honestly fine. he fought well. his gameplan was to wait for joshua to tire and pick a spot to be aggressive. it almost worked out for him. you can't fight a perfect fighw hen you're 41 and have 70 pro fights. your body just doens'tw ork liek that. he's obviosuily not as fast, explosive, quick to react as he was when he was 31, or 27.
he fought a very talented young fighter in his physical prime, one of the most talented kids in the sport. wladimir's problem is that he was 41 years old before a young, strong contender came along. i have no doubt that wladimir would beat wilder. joshua's just a combination of talent, schooling even if he's not the most experienced world champon level boxer, and the mind of a winner. the kid has a ton going for him. chin and conditioning looks good, too. most HW wladimir has hit with that right hand don't get up. these aren't welterweights.
Wladimir is way better than joshua, but messed this up. Should have stuck to short hooks he threw at eddie chambers, povetkin etc.
I think its a mix of aging and horrible tactics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostAJ fans will say it was all AJ just like Fury fans say it was all Fury and Wlad had no issues at all but Wlad's jab was weak. He may have gone light on it to stay mobile and avoid counters (or he may have been 41 years old) but anyone who has genuinely watched the man's technique over the years knows his punch quality was not the same as in previous years.
RJJ.
When he did (and that wasn't a lot) he had a success. It was regularly landing on AJ.
Not many people are talking about it, but I think a lot of these things have to do with the fact Steward is not with him. It's not unforeseeable that Wlad would win both fights (Fury and AJ) if Many was still around. I was listing to Bank's instructions during the AJ fight and IMO they were crap. ("he can't outbox you, he can't outbox you")...
Comment
Comment