Originally posted by Scipio2009
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Jacobs' Trainer Would Like Gennady Golovkin Rematch - Next
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by yankees7448 View PostWho gives a rat's a$$ who through more combos. All that means is that considering GGG through more punches despite throwing fewer combinations I.E he was more consistent with his offense.
Here is some math maybe you can understand:
More consistent offense+more accurate offense+scored the only knockdown in the fight+spent almost the entire fight moving forward= Victory for GGG.
Its easy to cry conspiracy when you don't do enough to win a close fight. Maybe if Jacobs did less posing and less moving backwards and more punching he would have won. Oh well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by j.razor View PostDude your lost. You should get in that ring and feel whats its like to be a fighter....Peace.
Personally, I know what its like to be a fighter. I've been a part of the roughest gang in Chappaqua NY since I was like a year and a half. I straight up cut a b!tch when she tried to use my blanky. So you better recognize.Last edited by yankees7448; 04-28-2017, 01:19 PM.
Comment
-
First fight took about a year to make mostly because Jacobs behaved like he's the A side and wanted so much money. The rematch would probably take ten years now that he thought he won the fight. Make it happen doe. In ten years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yankees7448 View PostI am sure whomever GGG fights will be better than the sacrificial lamb Jacobs gets matched up with. Haters crap all over GGG's resume but Jacob's competition has been downright pathetic. When Sergio Mora is your 4th best opponent by far you've got problems.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yankees7448 View PostJacobs landed a total of 16 more power punches over a 12 round fight and you mother****ers are acting like he dominated. No. He got outpunched and dropped. That the fight was as close as it was is a testiment to how well he fought. But he lost.
The fight was close, and could've gone either way; why are folks acting like there's no ground to run it back?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scipio2009 View PostFights are scored on a round by round bases, excluding the jab, in 8 of the 12 rounds, "Miracle Man" Daniel Jacobs was the fighter landing more of the heavier shots.
The fight was close, and could've gone either way; why are folks acting like there's no ground to run it back?
Comment
-
Anything that is not a Jab is called a Power Punch. The reason we count Jabs appart is because they are strategic punches that control the distance and sets up everything else in the fight.
Precision percentage means nothing really If one's strategy is to throw a machine gun barrage jab at your face that let you do nothing but step backward or side to side, at the end of the round only the bullet-hole counts does.
People that insist Jacobs won the fight because he threw more power punches are sadly mistaken.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yankees7448 View PostFights are won on a round by round basis and GGG was generally the busier fight who was moving forward. And he scored the only knockdown. No one is saying we don't need to see a rematch but we need Jacobs fans and the GGG haters to come to grips with the fact that Jacobs lost a close and competitive fight.
My argument is that the fact that it was a close and competitive fight would mean that they should run it back, with the only showdown trumping that being the spectacle of the Alvarez fight (especially after the shenanigans in stalling out the Billy Joe Saunders fight, with Saunders now obligated to fight Khurtsidze since the WBO doesn't really rock with the other governing bodies).
If Alvarez vs Chavez Jr ends up being the blockbuster success that it seems to be and the fight ends up being a good one (prompting Golden Boy to likely look at staging the rematch in front of 70k at AT&T Stadium), Golovkin has no other real option but to fight Jacobs again
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scipio2009 View Postno one is arguing that the fight was a close and competitive one (that went the other way); not from anyweher I've seen, anyway.
My argument is that the fact that it was a close and competitive fight would mean that they should run it back, with the only showdown trumping that being the spectacle of the Alvarez fight (especially after the shenanigans in stalling out the Billy Joe Saunders fight, with Saunders now obligated to fight Khurtsidze since the WBO doesn't really rock with the other governing bodies).
If Alvarez vs Chavez Jr ends up being the blockbuster success that it seems to be and the fight ends up being a good one (prompting Golden Boy to likely look at staging the rematch in front of 70k at AT&T Stadium), Golovkin has no other real option but to fight Jacobs againLast edited by yankees7448; 04-29-2017, 08:13 PM.
Comment
Comment