Originally posted by Redd Foxx
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: IBF: Indongo Must Face Lipinets Next, No Crawford Unification
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostI think Lipinets has to prove himself a little more, Indongo now has Troyanovsky and Burns. So he did step up already, this is really a step up fight for Lipinets, and more of a "confirmation" fight for Indongo. Well it's really just a mando, but looking at it from a pov that who's stepping up here, it's def no Indongo, he already stepped up.
But, I also happen to think pretty highly of Lipinets. I think he's a great fighter but no one here talks about him so maybe a win over him doesn't have much value with the fans as it does for me.
I do agree with you though, that Indongo had some more than Sergey at this point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostThe way I'm looking at it is; if Indongo fights Crawford right now, no one gives Crawford respect for the win. If Indongo beats a solid guy in Lipinets, he becomes a more valuable win for Crawford.
But, I also happen to think pretty highly of Lipinets. I think he's a great fighter but no one here talks about him so maybe a win over him doesn't have much value with the fans as it does for me.
I do agree with you though, that Indongo had some more than Sergey at this point.
I dont even think Burns looked that bad vs Indongo, he was just shut down in everything he tried to do. Couldnt deal with the reach when he was backing up, couldnt press the action because (according to Ricky himself) he was afraid of Indongos power and counters. JI is a good fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Cruise View Postpeople would give Crawford credit.
I've got the sense that the same crowd will write off Indongo after Crawford beats him but, when it comes down to it, I suppose a W over Sergey Lipinets wouldn't change that either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Cruise View PostThe problem is that the IBF is again letting rules come before whats good for boxing. Just like with Fury who was stripped because he had a rematch clause with the greatest HW of the last decade and didnt want to pass that up to fight Charles Martin.
I like that they stick to their rules but its pretty clear they need amending.
Problem is they likely have no desire to because unifications arent in their interest.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostIsn't the IBF always the organization that messes up unification fights? I always see them c*ckblocking unification fights every time they could.
Which is why the unification just took place. But now the mandatory is overdue. You can't skip the mandatory on the hope of another unification. Crawford has a fight scheduled. Clear the IBF mandatory and then unify with the winner of the Crawford fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Cruise View PostThe problem is that the IBF is again letting rules come before whats good for boxing. Just like with Fury who was stripped because he had a rematch clause with the greatest HW of the last decade and didnt want to pass that up to fight Charles Martin.
The IBF mandatory was overdue and Klitschko-Fury was sanctioned on the condition the winner would face the IBF mandatory. Both fighters promised the IBF the winner would fight the mandatory, then they hid a rematch clause from the IBF to trick them into sanctioning the fight.
IBF had no choice but to strip Fury for refusing to fight the overdue mandatory.
And Charles Martin wasn't the mandatory. It was Glazkov. Blame main events.
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View PostNo. The IBF is the most pro-unification of any of the organizations. They're the only one that specifically states in their rules that unification takes priority over a mandatory.
Which is why the unification just took place. But now the mandatory is overdue. You can't skip the mandatory on the hope of another unification. Crawford has a fight scheduled. Clear the IBF mandatory and then unify with the winner of the Crawford fight.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View Postits a pretty simple rule. You have to request the unification BEFORE a mandatory is ordered. Once its ordered, then thats that. And nobody has requested a unification.
The nerve of the IBF to actually follow their rules. for some reason that really seems to bother people here.......
Nothing wrong with following rules but Indongo, or any other champion, should be allowed to supersede a mandatory for a unification bout. Not allowing this reduces the possibility of an undisputed champion and robs fans of the opportunity to see the best fight the best.
Comment
Comment