Comments Thread For: IBF: Indongo Must Face Lipinets Next, No Crawford Unification

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

**** the IBF. Drop that **** and shoot for greatness

Lol then people will claim he ducked Lipinets... to face Crawford. Sort of like they said Ward ducked GGG... to face Kovalev.

[Nightfall]

drop the IBF status and move on

[Gentblue]

IBF stay ruining the sport......

I guess I can forgive it if it happened in LA if not **** this fight.

[hitking]

F.uck the belt, make the fight.

[Mr. Luthor]

Ridiculous to not allow a unification to supersede a mandatory.

[jonnyc420]

Doesnt really matter TC beats either one

[Motorcity Cobra]

Cool. If he wins then it helps build the Crawford fight.

I agree

Unification would be great to see.

This could be a decent fight however.

This is a very good fight

There's like 0 money involved in this fight.

**** the IBF. Drop that **** and shoot for greatness

Why would Crawford fight him without both straps?

[OnePunch]

Ridiculous to not allow a unification to supersede a mandatory.

its a pretty simple rule. You have to request the unification BEFORE a mandatory is ordered. Once its ordered, then thats that. And nobody has requested a unification.

The nerve of the IBF to actually follow their rules. for some reason that really seems to bother people here.......

[slimPickings]

He was once the hunter. He has now become the hunted!!
He has 3 belts. I expect him and his team to make the $mart decision!!!
Prize fighting has no retirement plan.

[ShoulderRoll]

The IBF sticks to it's rules no matter what. I have to give them respect for that.

They should just ammend their rulebook to say that unifications can overrule a mandatory at any time. One small change and then they can go back to strictly following their bylaws again.