Why Golovkin and Canelo gets criticism for Khan and Brook but

[Larry the boss]

Plus Gamboa was the interim damn WBA champ at 135 when they fought

[Sledgeweather17]

Oh my god are you ****ing serious? Postol ****ing sucks. Both lemieux and jacobs beat him. A mw version of lemieux kos postol cold. So does danny.

Danny is better than Postol on the eye test, but Postol has better accomplishments and a better chin.

But please don't go full ******. Everyone who isn't a GGG nutthugger knows that Lemule is a bum.

[Sledgeweather17]

youre not the only one whos seen it bro. and the thing is the gamboa v crawford size difference was a hell of a lot more noticeable than brook v golovkin. not saying the size difference wasnt big in that one too, but gamboa was like half the size of crawford and he was still lighting him up early on lol

He was lighting Crawford up early on because he has a much more extensive amateur career.

Watch the fight again and listen to Roy Jones. Max Kellerman asked Roy IN THE FIRST ROUND how he the fight would go in his opinion. Roy said that he expected Gamboa to dominate the first 3 or 4 rounds because of his amateur experience but for Crawford to take over from then on.

Guess what? It happend EXACTLY as Jones predicted.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Y'all said Garcia wanted nothing to do with Postol, as soon as Crawford schooled him he was an instabum. The hypocrisy of this place is pathetic.

I'm white European, and I consider myself a Ward and Crawford fan.

[g27region]

Y'all said Garcia wanted nothing to do with Postol, as soon as Crawford schooled him he was an instabum. The hypocrisy of this place is pathetic.

Who was saying that? Me? You want me to show you my messseges where I've said that Crawford gonna murder Postol before the fight actually happened? Don't bring up that **** in my thread or if you want to expose me as a hypocrite, back up your words

Fans who overrated Postol before the fight and fans who overrating him now to make Crawford's resume look better are no diffetent

[Jewish-Reptile]

Who was saying that? Me? You want me to show you my messseges where I've said that Crawford gonna murder Postol before the fight actually happened? Don't bring up that **** in my thread or if you want to expose me as a hypocrite, back up your words

Fans who overrated Postol before the fight and fans who overrating him now to make Crawford's resume look better are no diffetent

Crawford absolutely schooled a guy who was held in high esteem on here, not just made him look poor he SCHOOLED his ass.

You're Russian so I know you'll have a hard time accepting Postol is a quality operator. Could it be possible you were a Provodnikov fan ? I say was I expect you've distanced yourself from him right now ?

[John Locke]

Good question.

Probably because Crawford hasn't got an army of ******ed, irrational fanboys who are completely beyond reason.

Crawford's resume isn't very good and I don't think he's as skilled as other people think, Postol is his only legit win for me. I expect his upcoming fight with Diaz to be the toughest of his career, that would be a real nice W on the resume.

[g27region]

You're Russian so I know you'll have a hard time accepting Postol is a quality operator

Ha ha, why I accept Lomachenko or Usyk as a top quality fighters, according to your ******ed logic? Or why I don't accept that new russian boxer Lipinets as "special" like some people here?

Crawford absolutely schooled a guy who was held in high esteem on here, not just made him look poor he SCHOOLED his ass.

That's the problem of people who was holding him in high esteem. You're implying that I was one of those hypocrites. Back up your words, because I can back up mines

Here's what I've said BEFORE the fight

I think that Postol don't have any chances

I can't see nothing good about Postol, he's definitely overhyped. Crawford is an elite level fighter and that fight won't go distance, Postol will get KO'd

People overrate Postol, he's not as good as people think he is, and they're gonna be surprised by how easily Crawford will whoop that ass

Here's my messages before Crawford/Postol fight

Now show me the message where I've said that Postol will beat Crawford, if you're a man and take responsibility for your words. If you're a b!tch, you don't have to

[Jewish-Reptile]

Ha ha, why I accept Lomachenko or Usyk as a top quality fighters, according to your ******ed logic? Or why I don't accept that new russian boxer Lipinets as "special" like some people here?



That's the problem of people who was holding him in high esteem. You're implying that I was one of those hypocrites. Back up your words, because I can back up mines

Here's what I've said BEFORE the fight







Here's my messages before Crawford/Postol fight

Now show me the message where I've said that Postol will beat Crawford, if you're a man and take responsibility for your words. If you're a b!tch, you don't have to

I don't really give a shyt about sourcing anything here, I've better things to do than debate boxing with someone who doesn't feel the Postol or Gamboa wins for Crawford are insignificant but feels a win over Walters after a year out is.

Carry on acting like a ******, it's cute. You strike me as the type of guy who irons his socks, you do right ?

Usyk has a far more resounding win for me over Glowacki than anyone Loma has fought, Loma clearly has a lot of talent how he can be held in as high regard without the wins yet I'll let you explain ?

[Larry the boss]

Brook only had 1 decent win at 147 and never fought at 160

Khan =lol do i even need to explain?

Gamboa-was actually an interim champ at 135 and ranked there


HOW ARE WE COMPARING THESE FIGHTS?