Why Golovkin and Canelo gets criticism for Khan and Brook but

[g27region]

I'll let the forum decide when I run the annual ****** of the Year poster, don't panic you've made the final ten.

I thought you said you have better things to do than responding to me but it turned out you care so much about my sexual life that you even think about making a poll about it.

But I'm not surprised that you're not sticking to your words - very typical of you

You can't even take responsibility for your **** talking without asking other posters.

You need other people to back up **** you say behind your safe computer screen

You're full of b!tch traits and I don't even need a poll and other posters to prove that. I've asked you to back up your words and you can't say nothing in response

if you had a penis you'd be a man.

You have a penis but it's still hard to call you a man. A man is something more than your ****

[g27region]

just ignore scott weiland. guy thinks hes a stud cause he ****s his wladimir klitschko blow up doll every night....

A stud who's making A ****** of The Year type of threads in the internet? A stud who needs other people to give his words more credibility because he can't be responsible on his own?

[Madison Boxing]

scottweiland taking some heavyshots. where have you run off to boy? quit hiding...

[soul_survivor]

I think Postol is more talented than anyone on Golovkin's resume, though Jacobs is close. Neither of those two have stellar resumes but look who else is on the P4P list... We've got Kovalev who beat old Hopkins and shot Pascal. Rigo who beat 1 decent guy once. Loma is looking great and has a few decent wins but still lacks a great win, just as Crawford and Golovkin do.

We've got a lot of talented new guys that are building their resumes so if they get a little extra credit in the p4p because they pass the eye test, that's understandable. Rigo's presence in the p4p in 2017 is almost entirely based on the eye test at this point because his one good win is looking worse every time Donaire fights.

hahahahahhahaahhaaha

only red foxx

[Madison Boxing]

JWW is better than MW.

come on man lol, i needed a laugh but that was too much....

[uppercut510]

so damn tired of seeing lemiux name being thrown around as an elite win for gggee hes not bum but just stop it please

[SplitSecond]

I think Postol is more talented than anyone on Golovkin's resume, though Jacobs is close. Neither of those two have stellar resumes but look who else is on the P4P list... We've got Kovalev who beat old Hopkins and shot Pascal. Rigo who beat 1 decent guy once. Loma is looking great and has a few decent wins but still lacks a great win, just as Crawford and Golovkin do.

We've got a lot of talented new guys that are building their resumes so if they get a little extra credit in the p4p because they pass the eye test, that's understandable. Rigo's presence in the p4p in 2017 is almost entirely based on the eye test at this point because his one good win is looking worse every time Donaire fights.

Postol is more talented than Brook?

[Jewish-Reptile]

whats so bad about what i said. all im saying if he fought somone of gamboas skills who wasnt half the size of him he'd get his ass kicked. thats why hes hiding away at jr welter, the ****test division in boxing.

When Indongo beats Burns and Crawford beats him to unify every title you're gonna be even more upset he's achieved what Golden Goose Gennady hasn't.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Postol is more talented than Brook?

Boxing talent Postol is infinitely more skilled than Brook, that's not even debatable.

[SplitSecond]

Boxing talent Postol is infinitely more skilled than Brook, that's not even debatable.

I have my doubts on that claim. You should make a thread.