Comments Thread For: No Robbery at MSG, But Golovkin's Future Plans are Criminal

[Joe Beamish]

Saying damn. Nodody remembers who was ranked in the P4P popularity contests of yesteryear. This stuff just fades away. You have to wait till after a fighter has retired, and then some years beyond that, to see how guys rank in the all time lists.

[BoxngLove]

Only issue with that is Sergio was not natural MW.

GGG claimed he could make welter for years.. He has never work an extra ounce off for MW and neither did Sergio.
Canelo will probably shrug the 2nd day IBF weigh in,as he is bigger than these men fight night.

Jacobs knew when he did not step on the "HBO unofficial scale" before the fight he was going to need every advantage he could get.

[aboutfkntime]

What ego and since when do fighters fight on a flat fee? Name a major fight where a fighter took a flat fee?

name a fight where a guy who is NOT a draw turned down 15mil?

Canelo offered Golovkin 15mil, not 15 chickens

[theface07]

I watched the fight

Yeah and you're not bias at all right? You're the biggest Golovkin detractor on this site and the last person who would score a decision fairly.
On a side note, I'm sure you were getting increasingly aroused as you read through Fitzsimmons article.

[aboutfkntime]

Ggg won a close fight learn how to score a fight and don't base a fighter wining on your emotions. Jacob being the best middleweight not even close, even you didn't believe that when you wrote it. if ggg is worth a $h!t he will give Jacob a rematch and Shut people like you up and I believe ggg will give that rematch after he collects the belts.

your opinion is noted

I thought otherwise, and so did many others

the appropriate course of action is an immediate rematch

that belt crap is bullshht, like this article pointed out..... that rubbish is so that Hypekin can cherry-pick easy fights

Danny Jacobs is the best opponent, and in my opinion he is the best middleweight

a great fighter would have an issue with fans saying he lost, but that doesn't seem to worry Golovkin

[aboutfkntime]

Yeah and you're not bias at all right? You're the biggest Golovkin detractor on this site and the last person who would score a decision fairly.
On a side note, I'm sure you were getting increasingly aroused as you read through Fitzsimmons article.

I thought Jacobs won, but that it was a close fight that could have gone either way

obviously, a rematch is in order

I have no problem with Golovkin getting the nod, so long as he is willing to rematch Jacobs..... otherwise, I will insist that Jacobs won, seeing how Hypekin is too shicken to set the record straight

same with my boy Ward.....

if he fails to rematch Kovalev, I will give Sergey the nod for being the last man standing

think about this.....
1) you are a Golovkin fan
2) you think he beat Jacobs
3) many observers think Jacobs won
4) there is no better opponent than Jacobs

1+2+3+4= don't be fkn ridiculous, a rematch is obviously required..... why on earth would you object, tell me the reason?

all of that belt rubbish is just wankery, and you know it

"In reality, the only crime linked to Saturday is if Golovkin indeed fights Saunders for a meaningless trinket rather than giving Jacobs another fight. Indignant fans and media clods rail all the time about how insignificant the sanctioning bodies are, but they still want to see him collect all the belts. Sorry folks, but you can’t have it both ways. It was a close fight and it deserves a second go, certainly more so than a paper title chase. You want to save boxing and bring it back to some semblance of public consciousness, have your champions -- like Triple-G, in this case -- stop this "I need all the belts" nonsense. It's an easy path to easy fights, rather than forcing him to pursue greatness with another Jacobs fight, or by moving up."


I want all the belts, waaaaah..... huh, what was that?..... no, I hadn't noticed that middleweight was extremely weak and the belts are therefore meaningless..... honest

Golovkin is continuing to tip-toe through the tulips, and you guys are continuing to applaud him for it..... enough is enough, surely? SMH

[robbyheartbaby]

You said he won the WBA before the IBO. He didn't, he was given A WBA title, but not the one that mattered, Sturm had that. Some people choose not to recognise a secondary title, they believe there can't be 2 world champs for the same org. I agree.

Yep I see what you mean, GGG had that **** 'regular' title for a couple years before he was promoted to super champ. The regular title is just BS.

[Tomjas]

I thought Jacobs won, but that it was a close fight that could have gone either way

obviously, a rematch is in order

I have no problem with Golovkin getting the nod, so long as he is willing to rematch Jacobs..... otherwise, I will insist that Jacobs won, seeing how Hypekin is too shicken to set the record straight

same with my boy Ward.....

if he fails to rematch Kovalev, I will give Sergey the nod for being the last man standing

think about this.....
1) you are a Golovkin fan
2) you think he beat Jacobs
3) many observers think Jacobs won
4) there is no better opponent than Jacobs

1+2+3+4= don't be fkn ridiculous, a rematch is obviously required..... why on earth would you object, tell me the reason?

all of that belt rubbish is just wankery, and you know it

"In reality, the only crime linked to Saturday is if Golovkin indeed fights Saunders for a meaningless trinket rather than giving Jacobs another fight. Indignant fans and media clods rail all the time about how insignificant the sanctioning bodies are, but they still want to see him collect all the belts. Sorry folks, but you can’t have it both ways. It was a close fight and it deserves a second go, certainly more so than a paper title chase. You want to save boxing and bring it back to some semblance of public consciousness, have your champions -- like Triple-G, in this case -- stop this "I need all the belts" nonsense. It's an easy path to easy fights, rather than forcing him to pursue greatness with another Jacobs fight, or by moving up."


I want all the belts, waaaaah..... huh, what was that?..... no, I hadn't noticed that middleweight was extremely weak and the belts are therefore meaningless..... honest

Golovkin is continuing to tip-toe through the tulips, and you guys are continuing to applaud him for it..... enough is enough, surely? SMH

Who do you want him to fight in June given that Canelo is unavailable and Jacobs fights once a year?

[lex_fugitive]

If you spend your career with the Dominic Wades and Billy Joe Saunders of the world, you risk compromising stardom for comfort. And when it comes to a guy who can make any big fight he wants simply by signing his name, it'd be nice if Golovkin wanted something more than a shelf full of ***elry. - See more at: http://www.boxingscene.com/no-robber....cuJWDIIA.dpuf

If last Saturday proved anything, it is that G's "stardom" is a direct result of refusing to take on tough opponents. That is how he got Pact**** to ride on him. That is how both G and Chocolates got their high p4p rankings. If G would have fought someone like Jacobs before he wouldn't be on any p4p list and not known as knockout machine. He can make a cool $2 million for fighting bums, and get his followers to praise him for it. G, Loeffler, and Sanchez realize they very well might lose a rematch with Jacobs. No way does G take any meaningful fight before Canelo. He will fight cupcakes until he is ready to cash out against Canelo. There is still an offer just waiting for G's signature and all G, Loeffler, and Sanchez can talk about now is Blow Joe. Btw, I favor Canelo over G, but not by much and would not be surprised to see G pull off a huge win- I just wish G really wanted the big names instead of the easy paydays.

[lex_fugitive]

Who do you want him to fight in June given that Canelo is unavailable and Jacobs fights once a year?

I want him to sign a contract saying he will fight Canelo in September, as long as G wins over whoever he wants in June and Canelo beats JCC Jr. G and his followers were saying this last year and all we got to see was Wade and a welterweight. Sign the contract and everyone will shut up. If not, do what you did with Ward and admit Canelo is currently too good now but that G might consider it in a couple of years when G is even closer to the end of his boxing career.

No one hates G for his style, but for his steadfast refusal to test himself against top opposition. Canelo has more big names on his resume than G, and Canelo is over a decade younger. That is just plain ridiculous.