Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: No Robbery at MSG, But Golovkin's Future Plans are Criminal

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by ( . Y . ) View Post
    Golovkin is already appearing at the expo with a fight. this has been planned for years. You think Jacobs is willing to go to Kazakhstan?

    Clickbait article with zero substance.
    "You think Jacobs is willing to go to Kazakhstan?"
    Even Golovkin rather live & fight in the U.S than in Kazakhstan! LOL!

    Comment


    • #52
      GGG vs Jacobs was not a robbery.
      Canelo vs Lara was a robbery.

      We're so focused on GGG facing Jacobs again or canelo. Yet canelo has to prove himself. He's been lining his pockets as well. Lara deserves his rematch to get it right this time, canelo has been ducking him yet no one seems to be bring him up. GGG wants to unify the titles that's his goal. Jacobs nor canelo have the belt. Canelo had it but decided to drop it, that's on him.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
        Canelo dropped trout and it was open scoring he knew the scores and quit after the knockdown. After the fight said himself he lost. Aint no robbery when there is open scoring throughout the fight. Lara ran from canelo booed all night horrible fight where there was no public demand for a rematch to see that crap again. Jacobs flat out beat GGG and all fans been talking about since then is rematch. You deflecting like a bytch and grasping at straws because GGG showing the world what he about. SMH
        lol.............................

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
          I said the same thing if after losing in the minds of so many if he chooses to fight Saunders next he's a coward. He and his fans can't say he's the most feared man or that he's being ducked when you have 15m on the table for canelo, and a rematch with Jacobs all bigger fights. GGG pick one of those 2. Any other fight and he's ducking. Fans will excuse not giving Jacobs a rematch for a mega fight like canelo. But not giving Jacobs a rematch when the public demand is so high for a meaningless fight with Saunders in june? Get the phuk out of here. How many people that paid to see your fight this weekend have EVER seen Saunders fight? That will be pulling a salka and he deserves to be tar and feathered if he goes that route.
          Is Jacobs down with fighting June 10? If he is give him a ticket to Kazakhstan. There is probably a solid chance BJS opts out anyway lol.

          I don't see the big deal with staying active while cornering the belts from Canelo and Oscar and lining things up to make for the best chance to make the fight most fans wanna see in September. The Jacobs rematch can easily wait til December or early next year. That actually seems like strategically the smartest plan and certainly better then waiting til September like last year in the hopes Canelo will tell Oscar to make the f#cking fight so he'll quit looking like a ***** to a nice portion of boxing fans.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by epyh View Post
            And why exactly does Jacobs deserve a rematch?
            He was 5 years younger, came in 10-15 pounds heavier yet was following his corner's orders of "touch and go" and wouldn't engage Golovkin or take the title in a decisive manner.
            Plus he got decked.

            You would think Jacobs would go balls to the walls in the championship rounds, but he didn't exactly do that, did he?

            Jacobs deserves a rematch down the road, but when you climb in the ring with the idea of surviving and scoring points, you've lost your right to complain if the decision escapes you.

            By the way, the writter needs to learn to score rds; all 3 judges agreed on 8 rds: 5 for Gennady and 3 for Jacobs. For Jacobs to win, he would need to receive each remaining close rd.
            I'm a Golovkin fan but stop with bias and puss excuses.

            Who cares if Jacobs rehydrated 60 pounds and is taller.

            If middleweights are too big, then GGG need to rehydrate a lot too and move down to 154, vacate his 160 crown.

            Jacobs deserve a rematch because it was a fantastic competitive fight.

            Both fighters amazed me.

            So I want a rematch, not GGG fighting Tureano Johnson next.

            Comment


            • #56
              Nearly every Golovkin fan i've seen talk about a rematch doesn't want it. They know Golovkin was lucky to get the decision and want him to go back to fighting guys he can steamroll.

              Comment


              • #57
                I had Jacobs winning as well. but disagree with the writer.

                I don't see nothing wrong with GGG wanting to be undisputed. it'll be a tremendous accomplishment. something rarely seen. and if he breaks Hopkins defense record he goes in history books. period.

                there's no comparison to Hopkins. nobody was putting pressure on Bhop to move up even though his level of opposition wasn't much better than GGG.

                the Jacobs that we saw vs GGG most likely runs through Bernard's resume at 160 undefeated. just being real.

                Hopkins was on the MW throne for almost 20 years. and if judges had given him the win vs Taylor he would've never moved up.

                he finally moved up at age 41.

                I say let GGG accomplish his dreams of being undisputed and even though he downplays it I know he wants to shatter Hopkins defense record.

                another thing, what other boxer in this era would be planning on getting back in the ring just 3 months after their toughest fight? answer is none.

                I can't stand his coach or his fans. and yes I believe Jacobs won. but officially GGG got the W and nobody gonna change that.

                if Billy Hoe wasn't holding the belt hostage GGG would've accomplished this long ago.

                1. beat Billy Hoe in June (undisputed)
                2. try again to fight Eubank in September (I highly doubt Canelo fight happens this year)
                3. Jacobs rematch in December to attempt to break Hopkins record
                4. Canelo next year
                5. either move up or retire

                if GGG goes out like this. winning all these fights then all criticism is out the window. even though I pick Canelo to beat him.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by epyh View Post
                  Jacobs needs to fight Lemieux because both are super middles.

                  The GGG-Jacobs rematch will probably never happen because Jacobs won't be able to make safely 160 much longer, and Gennady will obviously never move to 167.
                  Oh I forgot GGG looked like shyt so now let's blame it on weight. The man who said he will knock out everyone at 168 but ran from ward like a bytch is now makes excuses because a man legally rehydrated after making 160. Guess he lied about being able to handle guys at 168 newsflash those guys at 168 enter the ring much bigger then jacobs.

                  But I get it he's Mr 154 or 168 ill fight anyone...but won't fight canelo at 155, won't fight ward at 168 and won't fight jacobs at 160 unless he pinky promises not to go over 10lbs fight night. LMAO
                  Last edited by bigdunny1; 03-21-2017, 02:20 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by epyh View Post
                    Jacobs needs to fight Lemieux because both are super middles.

                    The GGG-Jacobs rematch will probably never happen because Jacobs won't be able to make safely 160 much longer, and Gennady will obviously never move to 167.
                    So you want Golovkin to wait it out and Jacobs will move. YOU want Golovkin to duck because you are afraid he will lose. You couldn't make it any clearer.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by epyh View Post
                      It was a close fight where all 3 judges agreed on 8 rds and Jacobs getting decked in the fourth then hurt in the ninth.

                      The overwhelming majority of boxing writters had Gennady the deserving close winner.

                      Therefore there's no controversy whatsoever, except for Golovkin haters like yourself.
                      Don't be in denial, the result was controversial.

                      I'm a triple fan, but Jacobs had many serious people scoring the fight in his favour.

                      I'm not counting Fitzitroll in those serious people, the 12th rounds to Jacob, just go watch it and have a laugh.

                      I do agree with compubox stats.

                      GGG overall outlanded Jacobs, mainly with his jab, dropped him so I favor those points and GGG won IMO.

                      BUT, Jacobs outlanded GGG in the powerpunches department + the shoeshinning so I can see why many of them had Jacobs winning.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP