The Controversy is Gonzalez not Jacobs

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SweetPbfAli
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2006
    • 3291
    • 794
    • 798
    • 28,865

    #21
    Originally posted by Zaryu
    I think Chocolatito has a much better argument for being robbed last night than Jacobs.
    That's subjective for sure and I disagree.

    Comment

    • MikeLazcan
      Contender
      • Mar 2017
      • 111
      • 10
      • 20
      • 6,322

      #22
      Originally posted by Scholar
      soul_survivor clearly was aboard the hype train. Roman Gonzalez clearly lost last night. I was expecting the Thai to get screwed out. Last nights judging was refreshing after so many bad/controversial decisions.
      he's a terrible poster, there was no controversy with the gonzalez fight he was fairly beaten

      Comment

      • MikeLazcan
        Contender
        • Mar 2017
        • 111
        • 10
        • 20
        • 6,322

        #23
        Originally posted by danceswithfire
        you had the fight 8-4 for RG?.....jesus christ , you don't have the right to criticize other's scorecards with that BS, sorry!
        he also had the nerve to claim me saying jacobs won was trolling to

        Comment

        • The plunger man
          the minge monster
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2014
          • 9139
          • 1,021
          • 263
          • 67,551

          #24
          Originally posted by soul_survivor
          I think another point should have been taken away from the headbutts. It was excesisve and beyond accidental.

          And yeah, Gonzalez was clearly the superior fighter in there, whereas the other other was a physical trheat, strong enough to push RG back and grab him and out muscle him but pushing, headbutts and hugs dont win fights. Punches do.

          RG threw more and landed more.
          I agree ....i thought gonzalez deserved the win and his punch variation and timing which for me easily outweighed the crude often missing punches by the thai......i feel gonzalez also had the added disadvantage that blood was streaming down his face and into his eyes a good 6 rounds.
          His opponent was very clever with his head and although the head clashes looked innocent i did see him step inside quite a few times with his head after throwing a punch.
          Shame a great fighter loses that unbeaten record in such a tough situation with blood impairing your vision

          Comment

          • joseph5620
            undisputed
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 15564
            • 3,040
            • 5,610
            • 71,615

            #25
            Originally posted by soul_survivor
            So we've gone from black bias to latin bias lol

            C'mon guys, the comments you're making about the fights are beyond the relaity of what one seens when watching the fight and beyond what the vast majority viewing and scoring the fight also thinks.

            You just make yourselves look ******.
            You do that to yourself whenever you post.

            Comment

            • soul_survivor
              LOL @ Ali-Holmes
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jun 2013
              • 18949
              • 623
              • 473
              • 65,236

              #26
              Originally posted by Scholar
              soul_survivor clearly was aboard the hype train. Roman Gonzalez clearly lost last night. I was expecting the Thai to get screwed out. Last nights judging was refreshing after so many bad/controversial decisions.
              Where was the last time you saw me hyping Gonzalez?

              Anyway, views on this site are majorly scewed. The majority that watched the bout, including numerous publications, had RG winning. I think maybe watching the fight late at night and drunk is not good.

              Comment

              • soul_survivor
                LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2013
                • 18949
                • 623
                • 473
                • 65,236

                #27
                Originally posted by The plunger man
                I agree ....i thought gonzalez deserved the win and his punch variation and timing which for me easily outweighed the crude often missing punches by the thai......i feel gonzalez also had the added disadvantage that blood was streaming down his face and into his eyes a good 6 rounds.
                His opponent was very clever with his head and although the head clashes looked innocent i did see him step inside quite a few times with his head after throwing a punch.
                Shame a great fighter loses that unbeaten record in such a tough situation with blood impairing your vision
                Yeah, no idea how another point was not deducted. The ref did a pretty **** job tbh.

                Comment

                • Zaryu
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 3087
                  • 177
                  • 426
                  • 31,274

                  #28
                  Originally posted by SweetPbfAli
                  That's subjective for sure and I disagree.
                  I'll rewatch the fights eventually. I'll admit I'm a little more biased towards Gonzalez than either GGG or Jacobs, but hey, it's a boxing forum. It wouldn't be fun of we all agreed all the time.

                  Comment

                  • Kigali
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jun 2016
                    • 17128
                    • 263
                    • 0
                    • 19,441

                    #29
                    Originally posted by soul_survivor
                    I watched the fights earlier, without having known teh results before hand and I thought the controversy would be the undercard bout not the main event. GGG won that clearly but RG was absolutely robbed.

                    Yes Wang, Sur or whatever that guy wants to call himself put in some good, imposed himself physically at times but the points deduction and the fact that RG was landing the superior shots all night, with the better punch selection should have got him the win.

                    We are living in some crazy boxing dimension these days where the judges seemed to be paid off for every bout. Or they have no clue how to score a fight.

                    What was a possible fight of the year ends on a very sour note. Who did you guys have winning?
                    How convenient.....

                    Comment

                    • soul_survivor
                      LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 18949
                      • 623
                      • 473
                      • 65,236

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Zaryu
                      I'll rewatch the fights eventually. I'll admit I'm a little more biased towards Gonzalez than either GGG or Jacobs, but hey, it's a boxing forum. It wouldn't be fun of we all agreed all the time.
                      We can't agree all the time but we are all, supposedly, bxoing fans and putting national, racial and personal biases to one side, there waso nly one clear winner in the fight and it wasnt the guy with all the head butts.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP