Then why the **** did barrerra sign the contract? When the fighter with the right skin color gets a bad deal all of a sudden you defend them. If he won against beterbiev his stock would have gone up. Now he's lucky if he even gets 62k his next fight.
... don't place it under "the right or wrong skin color"... there are some posters here who regularly attack anyone who comes from the "Soviet school of boxing"...
Barrera and Rigo belong on the Cuban cowards list. They want the big fights, so long as they get paid very well.
"Anywhere anytime"
Yeh rigo should fight a guy who's about 4 weights naturally bigger than him, and lomachenko was the one who turned down the fight, he turned down the 124lb catch weight, if loma had accepted that the fight would have happened but he didn't want to concede anything
Barrera got a bad deal. He shouldn't have signed the contract if he wasn't happy though. You negotiate, and if both sides are happy (or at least come to a compromise), you sign.
If Barrera would have said originally that he didn't want to accept the purse of 60K, I honestly wouldn't have blamed him. This isn't a good look for him.
Unless you're some type of gatekeeper who the hell is gonna fight ANYBODY for 60k?
i don't know man, i wonder how much ranoni prieto did for his fight with beterbiev. usually those guys get a ****ty deal and prieto isn't a gatekeeper. he put a good fight vs alvarez
Barrera got a bad deal. He shouldn't have signed the contract if he wasn't happy though. You negotiate, and if both sides are happy (or at least come to a compromise), you sign.
If Barrera would have said originally that he didn't want to accept the purse of 60K, I honestly wouldn't have blamed him. This isn't a good look for him.
What contract? I wanna know this contract people are talking about.
Hmm, I admit I must have missed that. There seems to be confusion, if nothing else. If there is no contract, then I don't have a problem with Barrera's choice.
Comment