scrawny Golovkin's Horrid Performance Against Southpaw Gardner...tsk tsk

[kafkod]

This performance as I stated since 2015 is the reason they avoid elite Southpaws. Gardner and Luma were to awkward in style...

Jacobs isn't a southpaw doe, so how is that "analysis" supposed to help gamblers decide whether to back him against GGG?

[AneesMoha]

GGG will have problems against any boxer yet alone Kell Brook who came up two divisions. Had Kell Brook been his own size, he probably would have won the fight.

Couple of things. If Brook was GGGs own size he probably wouldn't of been as quick. Maybe had more power and durability. However the only advantage Brook had was his speed. He beat Golovkin to the punch and out landed him in rounds 2 and 3. However Golovkin did a lot more damage when he did tag Brook. And I really do not like that people go on as if Golovkin did not lay hands on Brook. Golovkin did better than Canelo did against Khan.

But there are no threads saying that if Khan was Canelo's size he would of won the fight.

[brettWall]

Yep. 3G is human. No disagreement there. But why do anti-GGG fanatics say Jacobs has zero chance of beating the guy who can have a bad day just like any human being? That's the mind-boggling part. In effect they're the ones hyping up GGG. If you've been saying 3G is a hype job, then why is it that the only guy who could beat him is the #2 P4P Ward at light heavy?

[SplitSecond]

Yep. 3G is human. No disagreement there. But why do anti-GGG fanatics say Jacobs has zero chance of beating the guy who can have a bad day just like any human being? That's the mind-boggling part. In effect they're the ones hyping up GGG. If you've been saying 3G is a hype job, then why is it that the only guy who could beat him is the #2 P4P Ward at light heavy?

I guess they say it with the assumption that Golovkin will show up sufficiently in-shape. If he doesn't show up in shape, mentally or physically, yes, it can be a rough night, but I think he'd really have to be off his game to lose to Jacobs. Or jacobs showing up levels above what he has shown in the past.

[brettWall]

I guess they say it with the assumption that Golovkin will show up sufficiently in-shape. If he doesn't show up in shape, mentally or physically, yes, it can be a rough night, but I think he'd really have to be off his game to lose to Jacobs. Or jacobs showing up levels above what he has shown in the past.

You can simply say it's a 50/50 fight doe. If not, would you say Ward is the only one who could beat Golovkn, the guy they keep calling a hypejob?

[SplitSecond]

You can simply say it's a 50/50 fight doe. If not, would you say Ward is the only one who could beat Golovkn, the guy they keep calling a hypejob?

You're absolutely right. They're just the definition of haters.

[Lester Tutor]

Jacobs isn't a southpaw doe, so how is that "analysis" supposed to help gamblers decide whether to back him against GGG?

Wait, you mean you've never seen Jacobs switch Southpaw?

[kafkod]

Wait, you mean you've never seen Jacobs switch Southpaw?

He sometimes switches to southpaw, but he's basically orthodox.

Accepting Jacobs as a southpaw doe, and if GGG's team have been avoiding southpaws, like you say, then why did they give Danny more than his mandated split in order to get him to accept the fight?

If they wanted to avoid him they could have just said "The mandated split is 75/25, take it or leave it" and the fight wouldn't be happening.

[Donnie Herrera]

Somebody's juicing!!!

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Somebody's juicing!!!

Wait... We dunno that for certain yet. We have to ask the expert in physiques and roids.

_Maxi what do you think of Golovkin's growth over the years? Juicing like a mofoka, ya?