scrawny Golovkin's Horrid Performance Against Southpaw Gardner...tsk tsk

[Lester Tutor]

Lol, that's how you know GGG is the real deal. People are going to desperate measures to troll his fans...

That video was just recently uploaded and somebody recommended it to me...

How old was Alvarez when he fought Jose Cotto?

[firstborn]

Yeah because watching an earlier fight has no base in reality and should completely be disregarded, like people who say that Moses didn't split the seas. ...

These GGG defenders, are living in a different reality, where the man has the best resume, never struggled, wins all fantasy fights and is actually the best pure boxer since Floyd. In reality he is very old now, beaten nobody of note and is only relevant because he has been fed, with people he could KO with a shoulderpunch. He is irrelevant in 2 years, so you better enjoy it, because Alvarez will smash his career into retirement.

All fighters have off nights, it's part of the game. I doubt anyone thinks GGG would have a hard time with him these days...

[firstborn]

[QUOTEThat video was just recently uploaded and somebody recommended it to me...

How old was Alvarez when he fought Jose Cotto? ][/QUOTE]

I get what you're saying. My point was that the video was brought up to troll the GGG fanatics. GGG is human and had a tough fight, no shame in that. Alvarez's fight with Cotto has no relevance today neither does the video of GGG having an off night several years....it only serves one purpose, to piss of certain fans of his.

[Lester Tutor]

[QUOTEThat video was just recently uploaded and somebody recommended it to me...

How old was Alvarez when he fought Jose Cotto? ]

I get what you're saying. My point was that the video was brought up to troll the GGG fanatics. GGG is human and had a tough fight, no shame in that. Alvarez's fight with Cotto has no relevance today neither does the video of GGG having an off night several years....it only serves one purpose, to piss of certain fans of his.[/QUOTE]

This sport is highly saturated in betting. To show bouts and criticize benefits the gambler. It's not about trolling.

[kafkod]

This sport is highly saturated in betting. To show bouts and criticize benefits the gambler. It's not about trolling.

If you want to lose money ******** on boxing, then digging up 10 year old fights and placing bets on the basis of what you see in them is the way to go.

I wouldn't recommend doing that if you want to win money doe.

[kafkod]

tbh, I want Golovkin to succeed. We need competitive fights for this sport at all costs..

[SplitSecond]

What's so bad about this performance. I watched it yesterday, but started dosing off, Golovkin seemed to dominate early and then the rds got a little cloer later on, maybe (dosing off) as I saw Gardener landing a bit more, but the Ouma fight was a lot worse than this. Golovkin abandoned everything to just beat the sht outta him. Now I really buy the sick story.

[GGG Gloveking]

Wow! Golovkin has a less than perfect performance ten years ago, so now he's going to lose? Keep reaching brother

[Lester Tutor]

If you want to lose money ******** on boxing, then digging up 10 year old fights and placing bets on the basis of what you see in them is the way to go.

I wouldn't recommend doing that if you want to win money doe.

I went from Morales' bouts, to Khan, to Herrera, to Salka, to Guerrero to Vargas... to assess that Danny wouldn't bear Thurman.

This performance as I stated since 2015 is the reason they avoid elite Southpaws. Gardner and Luma were to awkward in style...

[Scary]

All fighters have off nights, it's part of the game. I doubt anyone thinks GGG would have a hard time with him these days...

GGG will have problems against any boxer yet alone Kell Brook who came up two divisions. Had Kell Brook been his own size, he probably would have won the fight.