crawford is atleast progressing, he should face thurman-garcia winner.
I want to see loma vs mikey garcia.
Rigo is a straight up little ***** for refusing to face loma. He hasnt beaten anyone decent.
Bob is gonna keep him at 140 for another year or 2. I'm almost certain. It'd be great to see Crawford-Garcia within the next year...but I don't think Arum wants to do business with Garcia's team... hope I'm wrong though.
cause when i look at p4p lists he seems to be right up there near the top and i want to know why? Whats he done thats so impressive? Seen him top 3 in some of them yet i look at his cv and all he has on there is postol, burns and gamboa (half his size and gave him real problems). Is that considered a top CV these days? Was postol some superstar or something, pretty sure the top 147 fighters would have smashed him to pieces.
Theres quite a few fighters who have better wins than postol and have plenty of other B/C level fighters on there. Yet for some reason crawford has leapfrogged them. Brooks cv on here is widely considered on here as terrible, but is porter and senchenko really that much worse than postol and burns? Im not even counting gamboa cause of the ridiculous size difference. If you thought brook v ggg was a big size difference then i suggest you check out that fight....
So,what basis is there for him to be rated so highly, above other fighters who also possess at least one good win and then numerous victories over B and C level fighters. This is a genuine question because im scratching my head here...
He is winning fights VERY CONVINCINGLY against top guys. He is now a two division champ and I don't see anyone at 140 who can really even give him any trouble. I think if he were to move up to 147, he'd dominate the entire division, honestly.
cause when i look at p4p lists he seems to be right up there near the top and i want to know why? Whats he done thats so impressive? Seen him top 3 in some of them yet i look at his cv and all he has on there is postol, burns and gamboa (half his size and gave him real problems). Is that considered a top CV these days? Was postol some superstar or something, pretty sure the top 147 fighters would have smashed him to pieces.
Theres quite a few fighters who have better wins than postol and have plenty of other B/C level fighters on there. Yet for some reason crawford has leapfrogged them. Brooks cv on here is widely considered on here as terrible, but is porter and senchenko really that much worse than postol and burns? Im not even counting gamboa cause of the ridiculous size difference. If you thought brook v ggg was a big size difference then i suggest you check out that fight....
So,what basis is there for him to be rated so highly, above other fighters who also possess at least one good win and then numerous victories over B and C level fighters. This is a genuine question because im scratching my head here...
Also add that Burns was shot and Crawford ran in the Postal fight giving a dreadful performance.
He's American. He fights in America, so he gets overhyped and given bogus places on the P4P list.
difference is, hes not deliberately fighting **** opponents. Crawford seems to just be picking off whoever broner has recently beat, seen he wants to fight granados next, wtf is up with that lol
His selection of opponents have always been ****. They're either from outside of the top ten from his division, or from the division below.
Now he's fighting a ropey Molina in a fight no one should care about. I certainly don't.
Tweet
Comment