Tweet
cause when i look at p4p lists he seems to be right up there near the top and i want to know why? Whats he done thats so impressive? Seen him top 3 in some of them yet i look at his cv and all he has on there is postol, burns and gamboa (half his size and gave him real problems). Is that considered a top CV these days? Was postol some superstar or something, pretty sure the top 147 fighters would have smashed him to pieces.
Theres quite a few fighters who have better wins than postol and have plenty of other B/C level fighters on there. Yet for some reason crawford has leapfrogged them. Brooks cv on here is widely considered on here as terrible, but is porter and senchenko really that much worse than postol and burns? Im not even counting gamboa cause of the ridiculous size difference. If you thought brook v ggg was a big size difference then i suggest you check out that fight....
So,what basis is there for him to be rated so highly, above other fighters who also possess at least one good win and then numerous victories over B and C level fighters. This is a genuine question because im scratching my head here...
Theres quite a few fighters who have better wins than postol and have plenty of other B/C level fighters on there. Yet for some reason crawford has leapfrogged them. Brooks cv on here is widely considered on here as terrible, but is porter and senchenko really that much worse than postol and burns? Im not even counting gamboa cause of the ridiculous size difference. If you thought brook v ggg was a big size difference then i suggest you check out that fight....
So,what basis is there for him to be rated so highly, above other fighters who also possess at least one good win and then numerous victories over B and C level fighters. This is a genuine question because im scratching my head here...
Comment