whats crawford done thats so amazing...

[Larry the boss]

he didnt just choose to fight john ****ing molina

Yea he chose to ****ing fight Kell Brook,wade Lemieux and monroe in his last 4 fights,,,what is so amazing about that?

[al-Xander]

The truth pisses people off.

[j0zef]

He had a decent resume, then he absolutely and utterly embarassed clear #2 and fellow titlist Viktor Postol in a unification match.

Like Kev said, you can make an argument that picks apart everyone's resume.

[Madison Boxing]

Yea he chose to ****ing fight Kell Brook,wade Lemieux and monroe in his last 4 fights,,,what is so amazing about that?

difference is, hes not deliberately fighting **** opponents. Crawford seems to just be picking off whoever broner has recently beat, seen he wants to fight granados next, wtf is up with that lol

[Madison Boxing]

He had a decent resume, then he absolutely and utterly embarassed clear #2 and fellow titlist Viktor Postol in a unification match.

Like Kev said, you can make an argument that picks apart everyone's resume.

dont really know what was so great about postol and i said that before the fight. 140 is weak as piss and always has been, postol may be 2nd best in that division, he'd struggle to be top 10 at welterweight. Its a division for people who are scared they will get found out at welterweight.

[soul_survivor]

Crawford hasnt been amazing per say but he has ben consistent and shown that he is a level above just about everyone he has faced (Gamboa gaveh im his toughes tfight but ended up being too small). He has also carred his skills across 2 weight divisions, kinda the point of p4p. Is he a top 5 p4p, I don't think so (wouldnt argue too much with anyone who would have him as such) but he is certainly top 10 based on his skills transferring across divisions and just how well, theoretically, he would do against other top guys.

[al-Xander]

He had a decent resume, then he absolutely and utterly embarassed clear #2 and fellow titlist Viktor Postol in a unification match.

Like Kev said, you can make an argument that picks apart everyone's resume.

TC is not hated as much as guys like Loma and GGG, who gets hate threads everyday. TC also doesn't have a hard time getting opponents.

[-PBP-]

He hasn't done ****. The top 10 pound for pound list should look like this:

1. GGG
2. Kovalev
3. Loamchenko
4. Klitchko
5. Rocky Balboa
6. Ivan Drago
7. Dude from the movie Southpaw
8. Conor McGregor
9. Ken Masters From Street Fighter
10. Guile From Street Fighter

[Real King Kong]

Almost no one in the Top 10 P4P is there for their resume.

Inoue - Narvaez.

Yamanaka? Moreno and Darchinyan.

Lomachenko - Russell Jr and Walters.

Golovkin - Murray, Brook, Lemiuex, Rubio.

Gonzalez - Estrada, Cuadras, Arroyo, Yaegashi, Viloria.

Rigondeaux - Donaire, Agbeko.

Crawford - Postol, Gamboa, Burns, Beltran.

Kovalev - Hopkins, Pascal, Chilemba, Cleverly.

Ward - Froch, Kovalev, Kessler, Abraham, Bika, Dawson, Barrera.

As you can see, maybe 3 guys tops are there for their actual resumes.

Someone needs to show this to the parade of clowns who always site ggg's lack of resume as the main reason he shouldn't be rated as a top p4p fighter.

[Dr Rumack]

He's schooling good opposition regularly. Don't be such a boxrec warrior. It's obvious he's highly skilled to anyone who know's anything about the sport.