then consider your rhetorical question designed to produce effect or make a statement to have actually elicited some information.
If you think he gets away with fighting like that against opposition such as Ortiz or Joshua for 4 or 5 rounds unpunished to then just "end it with one punch" then you'd be sorely mistaken and my original statement carries weight and still rings true, rhetorical question or otherwise.
a WBC champion, fighting a level of opposition unworthy of being a challenger does not provide a shining a light for themselves or the sport when, despite the terrible judges scorecards, they are in the eyes of the vast majority.. losing.
If you think he gets away with fighting like that against opposition such as Ortiz or Joshua for 4 or 5 rounds unpunished to then just "end it with one punch" then you'd be sorely mistaken and my original statement carries weight and still rings true, rhetorical question or otherwise.
a WBC champion, fighting a level of opposition unworthy of being a challenger does not provide a shining a light for themselves or the sport when, despite the terrible judges scorecards, they are in the eyes of the vast majority.. losing.
Comment