I see everyone's lists
and they all have great fighters
But Come on Why isnt Ali in it???
there are simply way better complete fighters. ali was good but he was not great, and is overrated, along with marciano.. people just say he was the greatest because of the fact that he beat a prime george foreman, his personality and his ego, his moves inside the ring, and finally, his self-appointed nickname,'the greatest'.
roy jones jr is more of a complete fighter than ali was
Ali did not have a big punch and his defensive fundamentals were very lacking. Very talented guy but it makes little sense to include him in a well rounded fighter discussion, b-c he simply wasn´t.
Hagler, Robinson and Hopkins are great picks.
I´d add Aaron Pryor, Micky Walker, and Joe Louis as well.
Ray Robinson is the most complete fighter of all time, he could do anything. It didn't seem like it sometimes, but Ruben Olivares could do everything in the ring. Tommy Hearns was very versatile, just look at the first Leonard fight. The one thing he couldn't do was take a punch.
I think Pacman is one of them...two fisted fighter with speed and endurance...KO POWER!!!
Now that was uncalled for. I'm here trying to bring credibility to Pacquiao's fans with my objective views on boxing, and **** like this comes out and makes Pacquiao fans look bad.
Comment