Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo Says Golovkin Given Good Offer, Not Being Reasonable

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by JASON SHAW View Post
    IF MANNY CAN TURN DOWN $40 MILLION FROM FLOYD THEN GGG CAN TURN DOWN A MEASLY $15 MILLION..... NO MORE MEXICAN DOUBLE STANDARDS
    The difference is that Pacquiao was the biggest draw in boxing at the time, with huge PPV numbers. Golovkin for all his accomplishments is unknown to the general public. Let's see how many PPV numbers he gets fighting Jacobs in New York City, a hometown guy in the biggest media market in the world. The fact is Canelo can make more money without Golovkin than Golovkin can without Canelo.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
      Canelo walked away from that Mayweather fight with $13 mil. Upside, downside, flat fee all comes down to one thing, how big is the cheque. The $15 mil cheque being offered is huge for a guy that makes 2-3 mil.
      Just because other fighters in past allowed themselves to be screwed doesn't mean ggg should.

      It's probably not just the money for ggg. He knows he deserves more. Canelo is a biiitch who ducked him and need to take care of that or forever be stained by that. No bs flat fee is getting him off the hook.

      GGG still drives his 8 year old truck, spends all his time training.

      If he feels like not taking 15 million, more power to him.

      Someone should stand up to these A-side biiiitches.

      Comment


      • #73
        Anytime a flat fee is involved you can immediately think pricing out. Everyone who understands the industry and the business thinks this is a joke. Not one reputable person in the sport has defended this.

        /thread

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
          First, Canelo won't be that much of a legacy fight. Dude won't beat ggg, Andrade, Charlo, or any top MW or soon to be. Gingers team knows this.

          GGG needs money for this. The legacy fights will be better than Canelo.

          If they don't get 70/30 and don't accept it, most casuals won't give a **** why Canelo
          Great so it's not for legacy, GGG is just after the money... just like Eubank, casual couldn't care less what Canelo does they would still watch him.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post

            If he feels like not taking 15 million, more power to him.

            Someone should stand up to these A-side biiiitches.
            I agree with you, no one should be forced to take a career high payday, Eubank did the same thing to GGG, that GGG did to Canelo.... more power to them.

            Comment


            • #76
              Let me get this straight....Eubank did this and he was what? Canelo fought Khan and he/you guys talked sh|t about that, GGG fights brook and and its cool, there are those double standards. So we no for sure, ggg doesnt want it as much as he says to you dimwits. So ggg is ducking and dodging and the excuses are coming

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
                Asking for less than half of the pot in a fight where you are a p4p top fighter with three titles and the consesious number one dog at MW, isn't absurd.

                People think ggg should get screwed because others did first.

                That's ****ing ******. The guy is done getting screwed. He's seen as a beast even with these biiiitches Ducking and diving all over the place to get away from him.
                So to prevent himself from being "screwed", he is going to pass up 15 million? That's 3 fights worth of money based on his latest pursues. What fights can he take to make up that money? It's not like he can make 5 million per fight fighting low risk bums.

                Comment


                • #78
                  The diva still trying to convince people that she isn't scared after dropping the belt and moving "down" to 154 claiming she wasn't ever a 160 pound boxer, even though she is fighting at 165 now? Ah, the life of a coward must be tough.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by verus View Post
                    the difference is that pacquiao was the biggest draw in boxing at the time, with huge ppv numbers. Golovkin for all his accomplishments is unknown to the general public. Let's see how many ppv numbers he gets fighting jacobs in new york city, a hometown guy in the biggest media market in the world. The fact is canelo can make more money without golovkin than golovkin can without canelo.
                    um no, floyd was the biggest draw with bigger ppv numbers.... Thats why manny the fraud begged floyd for the fight for years.....

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Clearly not a good enough offer, just like when Canelo held the WBC belt and was entitled to 70% of the money collected from the bout, he walked away. So I highly doubt the offer is anywhere comparable to that 30%. Besides that point, our opinion doesn't matter, clearly the offer wasn't good enough for him the fighter. When your promoter comes out and says "we made a flat fee offer take it or leave it" perhaps you should walk up to the mirror and look for unreasonable there.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP