Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[ADP02]

This has nothing to do with the IV. Mayweather delayed during the Mosley fight and there was no big deal.



You're still going? Look how much of a butthurt hypocrite you are. You brought up Lance sneaking in an IV how many times? Now according to you it's impossible.... because it doesn't fit your agenda anymore! LMAOOOO

You had a change of heart, huh? Look how quickly your bullshlt falls apart and then you take another stance when you are proven WRONG!

GAME OVER

Maybe this will help you out:

Go Cure your butthurt with Sea Water, Son!!!

Actually we do not even know if that was the only time that there was a delay. We just got lucky that it was recorded!

Secondly, if it was the only time then it would be looked at differently but TWICE and that there may be other times and there was an IV that followed that long delay? Only die hard Floyd fans cannot see that it was a very big deal!

Someone who is micro dosing is already hard enough as it is to catch, now add those extra 6 hours delay.

--------------------------------

Impossible? Where did I say that? Did you see Floyd's body guards? Not hard to hide behind those guys and pass something to Floyd .....

The thing is that Floyd was allowed to have a huge delay and allowed to use an IV. The DCO was there as a witness. So were the people who administered the IV. That company also must have logs and a bill with what Floyd did. Other people were there to witness the scandal too.

Like I said, it was all documented.

----------------------------------

Do not be naive.


TUEs can be easy to get with a doctor's help

Appearing on the BBC’s Sportsweek programme on Sunday, the respiratory expert Dr John ****inson of the University of Kent, said: “The way the rules are, it allows for that grey zone. It allows for that 1% of athletes with the help of a medical doctor to look at the system and say: ‘You know what, we can get you that drug.’ There is no clear evidence, but the rules can allow that to happen.”


"... on the other side of the argument, difficult questions over the use of TUEs to boost performance by unscrupulous coaches and doctors persist. "

[ADP02]

Its not my fault that you do not want to accept that what happened with Diaz was all possible. 3 experts mentioned it.

That Creatinine and Specific Gravity tests have their limitations is well known but keep your head in the sand.

Funny how nothing is possible unless it helps your case and vice versa.

DEFLECTOR!!!!



BTW - You are defending a known and admitted marijuana user (Diaz) where ALL tests had levels of marijuana(diluted ones were less, obviously). Guess what marijuana does? Its even banned but not Torodal and USADA gave Manny the green light.

With Manny, you cannot let go on an unchecked check box. With Floyd using a banned method, its all good. Right?

Still to this day you cannot defend:
I, Floyd, used banned IV because:
==> I gave urine,
==> I gave <1 tbsp. blood 10 days before and
==> Did a little exercise the day before


yet USADA was telling UFC athletes that even if they actually lose a lot of weight, they cannot use an IV. Floyd admitted that he has weighed at 148, 150 for a decade.


.



.

Last I read up on this, 2 experts said you are WRONG. NO experts said you are right.


Give up. It's over.

You read wrong ..... DEFLECTOR!!!

Still to this day you cannot defend:
I, Floyd, used banned IV because:
==> I gave urine,
==> I gave <1 tbsp. blood 10 days before and
==> Did a little exercise the day before

[ADP02]

Declared IV use before providing their urine sample.

Is that what Floyd did? Nope. Damn you are so hurt by your loss. It's time for you to move on and stop crying like a damn baby. Pacquiao lost. It's over!

None of them had a TUE, remember?

USADA statement for those athletes that were suspended:
"IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor's office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance."

Secondly, which is the funniest part, when is the best time to get an IV to mask PEDs? Days before you give the urine sample or just before giving the urine sample?

If you are not sure, go ask your friends Lance Armstrong and Floyd Mayweather!!!

[travestyny]

Actually we do not even know if that was the only time that there was a delay. We just got lucky that it was recorded!

Secondly, if it was the only time then it would be looked at differently but TWICE and that there may be other times and there was an IV that followed that long delay? Only die hard Floyd fans cannot see that it was a very big deal!

Someone who is micro dosing is already hard enough as it is to catch, now add those extra 6 hours delay.

--------------------------------

Impossible? Where did I say that? Did you see Floyd's body guards? Not hard to hide behind those guys and pass something to Floyd .....

The thing is that Floyd was allowed to have a huge delay and allowed to use an IV. The DCO was there as a witness. So were the people who administered the IV. That company also must have logs and a bill with what Floyd did. Other people were there to witness the scandal too.

Like I said, it was all documented.

----------------------------------

Do not be naive.


TUEs can be easy to get with a doctor's help

Appearing on the BBC’s Sportsweek programme on Sunday, the respiratory expert Dr John ****inson of the University of Kent, said: “The way the rules are, it allows for that grey zone. It allows for that 1% of athletes with the help of a medical doctor to look at the system and say: ‘You know what, we can get you that drug.’ There is no clear evidence, but the rules can allow that to happen.”


"... on the other side of the argument, difficult questions over the use of TUEs to boost performance by unscrupulous coaches and doctors persist. "

OMG dude let it go! He gave a partial sample from before the IV. Even Hauser now admits that he wasn't "caught" about to have the IV, and the DCO (that you now seem to be saying did their job and was not paid off) noted the reasons that the IV was necessary. Your conspiracy theory is based on so much speculation that it isn't worth anyone wasting their time on. Everyone has moved on!

[travestyny]

None of them had a TUE, remember?

USADA statement for those athletes that were suspended:
"IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor's office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance."

Secondly, which is the funniest part, when is the best time to get an IV to mask PEDs? Days before you give the urine sample or just before giving the urine sample?

If you are not sure, go ask your friends Lance Armstrong and Floyd Mayweather!!!

1. He gave a partial urine sample BEFORE the IV.
2. A WADA spokesman has stated that a retroactive TUE can be received for IV use. Not only that, but USADA released a defense of this practice to the public that clearly stated over and over that a retroactive TUE is a standard part of the ISTUE. USADA clearly had nothing to hide, AND WADA was fully aware of the details. Yea, seems like they did something against the rules....if you are a desperate PacRoach.

Move on with your life! It's over.

[travestyny]

You read wrong ..... DEFLECTOR!!!

Still to this day you cannot defend:
I, Floyd, used banned IV because:
==> I gave urine,
==> I gave <1 tbsp. blood 10 days before and
==> Did a little exercise the day before

==>It was prescribed by a doctor.
==>The reason for it was noted by a doping control officer before it was administered.
==>It was approved of by an independent the****utic use exemptions committee.

I'm beginning to feel like your psychologist, as you sit on my couch going on and on about a conspiracy theory that I've pointed out a billion times makes no damn sense.

Believe what you want. Just stop writing to me about it.

[ADP02]

Actually we do not even know if that was the only time that there was a delay. We just got lucky that it was recorded!

Secondly, if it was the only time then it would be looked at differently but TWICE and that there may be other times and there was an IV that followed that long delay? Only die hard Floyd fans cannot see that it was a very big deal!

Someone who is micro dosing is already hard enough as it is to catch, now add those extra 6 hours delay.

--------------------------------

Impossible? Where did I say that? Did you see Floyd's body guards? Not hard to hide behind those guys and pass something to Floyd .....

The thing is that Floyd was allowed to have a huge delay and allowed to use an IV. The DCO was there as a witness. So were the people who administered the IV. That company also must have logs and a bill with what Floyd did. Other people were there to witness the scandal too.

Like I said, it was all documented.

----------------------------------

Do not be naive.


TUEs can be easy to get with a doctor's help

Appearing on the BBC’s Sportsweek programme on Sunday, the respiratory expert Dr John ****inson of the University of Kent, said: “The way the rules are, it allows for that grey zone. It allows for that 1% of athletes with the help of a medical doctor to look at the system and say: ‘You know what, we can get you that drug.’ There is no clear evidence, but the rules can allow that to happen.”


"... on the other side of the argument, difficult questions over the use of TUEs to boost performance by unscrupulous coaches and doctors persist. "

OMG dude let it go! He gave a partial sample from before the IV. Even Hauser now admits that he wasn't "caught" about to have the IV, and the DCO (that you now seem to be saying did their job and was not paid off) noted the reasons that the IV was necessary. Your conspiracy theory is based on so much speculation that it isn't worth anyone wasting their time on. Everyone has moved on!

Again with this Partial?
- That means that it was not sufficient!
- Floyd delayed many hours.
- You drink like Floyd was drinking then hours later you tell the DCO that you can't urinate. How do you think that is going to come off? Then still needs an IV? Yet no investigation?


Nope, its you that keeps on suggesting that everyone needs to be in on it. While there may be several people involved, it can be that its just a few that were involved and as the article stated, it does NOT take much to get the TUEC to sign off on what the doctor said about Floyd. JUST LIKE I KEEP ON TELLING YOU!!!!

No investigation, Why?

Travis Tygart INTERVIEW ON IV


"WE DECIDE WHO TO INVESTIGATE AND WHO TO NOT."

[ADP02]

1. He gave a partial urine sample BEFORE the IV.
2. A WADA spokesman has stated that a retroactive TUE can be received for IV use. Not only that, but USADA released a defense of this practice to the public that clearly stated over and over that a retroactive TUE is a standard part of the ISTUE. USADA clearly had nothing to hide, AND WADA was fully aware of the details. Yea, seems like they did something against the rules....if you are a desperate PacRoach.

Move on with your life! It's over.

You know very well that WADA spokesperson was generalizing and NOT discussing Floyd's case!!!!

Of course there can be a RETRO TUE given but NOT in those circumstances!!!! Was Floyd in some kind of serious situation where he had to have this IV? Or was it for some other reasons?

Floyd was on weight from 30 days out and admitted to making weight EASILY for a decade including in the video he states it was NOT a weight issue.

It was because of giving urine, ......

Right after getting an IV, Floyd boasts on how he has an advantage over others who dehydrate themselves 20-30lbs and need to rehydrate themselves while he is fresh, that makes sense to you?

I bet none of that was stated during the TUEC/WADA documentation. I'm sure that Floyd's vitals being normal was not brought up. That Floyd drank enough to rehydrate himself after the weigh in. That he makes weight easily. Floyd's pre-fight form had nothing about dehydration. That he had a physical done by NSAC ..... YET NO INVESTIGATION TO CHECK ALL THAT UP??????!!!!

"I'm not one particular fighter that has drained himself 20 or 30 pounds. I'm a fighter that walks around at 150, 148... I'm extremely happy with everything..."

[ADP02]

You read wrong ..... DEFLECTOR!!!

Still to this day you cannot defend:
I, Floyd, used banned IV because:
==> I gave urine,
==> I gave <1 tbsp. blood 10 days before and
==> Did a little exercise the day before

==>It was prescribed by a doctor.
==>The reason for it was noted by a doping control officer before it was administered.
==>It was approved of by an independent the****utic use exemptions committee.

I'm beginning to feel like your psychologist, as you sit on my couch going on and on about a conspiracy theory that I've pointed out a billion times makes no damn sense.

Believe what you want. Just stop writing to me about it.

DEFLECTOR is at it again!!!

We know that FLOYD's doctor gave Floyd a "special" note to give to USADA. BIG DEAL!!!

Like I said, Floyd's doctor will only point out Floyd's side of the story. Just like Diaz's "expert" tries to make it look "good" for Diaz even though it was all BAD for Diaz. ... so bad that they didn't even check the B Sample. That is 101 basics ..... IF YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT!

[Reloaded]

1. He gave a partial urine sample BEFORE the IV.
2. A WADA spokesman has stated that a retroactive TUE can be received for IV use. Not only that, but USADA released a defense of this practice to the public that clearly stated over and over that a retroactive TUE is a standard part of the ISTUE. USADA clearly had nothing to hide, AND WADA was fully aware of the details. Yea, seems like they did something against the rules....if you are a desperate PacRoach.

Move on with your life! It's over.

In this case its like telling a schizophrenic to not be paranoid.

These people are off in the head you gotta know that by now.