Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
Like as if doing that would cure your deflections. Nope. What was said to be said was said.
SG has its limitations. You cannot admit to what I presented to you.
3 experts who were part of the trial explained it to you.
The MRO's scenario was derailed as soon as he didn't request that the B sample be tested, used UNRELIABLE data, no scientific evidence presented, said that he never came across this type of case (TEST #1, TEST #2, TEST #3) and there are other explanations as he admitted to ... but YOU know why. No, the MRO wasn't thinking conspiracy like you. He was thinking that and probably Diaz told him, that will come back positive too!
What do you call yourself in the Thunderdome?
Travestyny the Deflector!!!
.
Comment