Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    Once again, you go with the old "they are biased" scenario. LMAO.

    Plus you are still incapable of understand what the MRO is telling you.

    How about this: That thunderdome thread is still around. You want to get decapitated there or are you still gonna duck it like a bltch.

    I challenged you because I know you are full of shlt. Do you finally accept the challenge? You claim you are right. Prove it. Let BOxing Scene decide which one is right.

    Let's bet all of our points and our sig. deal? Let's see if you can man up bltch! Lmao. I bet you won't accept.
    I honestly told you that I never been to that section (Thunderdome) .... but what's the point of anything if all you do is deflect?

    Like as if doing that would cure your deflections. Nope. What was said to be said was said.

    SG has its limitations. You cannot admit to what I presented to you.


    3 experts who were part of the trial explained it to you.

    The MRO's scenario was derailed as soon as he didn't request that the B sample be tested, used UNRELIABLE data, no scientific evidence presented, said that he never came across this type of case (TEST #1, TEST #2, TEST #3) and there are other explanations as he admitted to ... but YOU know why. No, the MRO wasn't thinking conspiracy like you. He was thinking that and probably Diaz told him, that will come back positive too!


    What do you call yourself in the Thunderdome?

    Travestyny the Deflector!!!



    .
    Last edited by ADP02; 01-25-2017, 01:39 AM.

    Comment


    • No you didn't. Just shut up about it already.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
        Moron is you. Name is not important. The explanation of what LABs can find is what was discussed and you called out that its not possible or BS. Since you cannot admit that you were WRONG, you deflected until this day. Not surprised anymore.

        but I have realized that you will deflect and cannot admit your faults. My fault was thinking that by presenting you with clear evidence that you would participate and accept the evidence presented.




        I presented to you plenty but you just deflected it away with NOTHING in return as a response.


        Examples:
        The article that I presented to you on rehydration by an expert. He said that Floyd should have been able to rehydrate quickly (not require an IV). You deflected.

        The article on diluting 8-10+ FOLDs and stating that one can bring down THC metabolite from 400 to 50 (8 FOLDs). You laughed at that but why? You had something? Nope. That was an article that was written for the courts but you who cannot understand what 8 FOLDs mean is right?

        Then when I showed you that SG readings of 1.01 while they stated that the ******* metabolite still remained below threshold levels, you deflected and said that it has nothing to do with marijuana BUT it does have to do with SG limitations you deflector!!!

        Then I showed you studies that clearly show diluted but above threshold levels while the THC metabolite as below thresholds .... crickets from the deflector!

        I can go on .... but you will deflect.

        .
        That never happened. I think you need to stop faking your quotations and stop giving false information. What happened was you said mayweather abused clenbuterol and I laughed at your dumb ass.

        Don't make me go find the posts you ****ing ******.

        As for the rest of this, you know I already destroyed you.

        But if that makes you feel some type of way, step up. All my points and my sig against yours.

        You down or you gonna live your life as a bltch. I DARE YOU!!!!

        Comment


        • Flom0s getting rekt by real evidence Bwahahahahahaha.

          Floyd may have won the pacquiao fight but he's still a drug cheat.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            I honestly told you that I never been to that section (Thunderdome) .... but what's the point of anything if all you do is deflect?

            Like as if doing that would cure your deflections. Nope. What was said to be said was said.

            SG has its limitations. You cannot admit to what I presented to you.


            3 experts who were part of the trial explained it to you.

            The MRO's scenario was derailed as soon as he didn't request that the B sample be tested, used UNRELIABLE data, no scientific evidence presented, said that he never came across this type of case (TEST #1, TEST #2, TEST #3) and there are other explanations as he admitted to ... but YOU know why. No, the MRO wasn't thinking conspiracy like you. He was thinking that and probably Diaz told him, that will come back positive too!


            What do you call yourself in the Thunderdome?

            Travestyny the Deflector!!!



            .
            Hahahaha. Numerous posters pointed you to the thunderdome. A poster mentioned it to you on your profile. A bunch of us mentioned you there so I know you got the notifications.

            You're a cowardly bltch and you know you got nothing.

            When you are ready to step up and stop being a bltch, let me know!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
              I honestly told you that I never been to that section (Thunderdome) .... but what's the point of anything if all you do is deflect?

              Like as if doing that would cure your deflections. Nope. What was said to be said was said.

              SG has its limitations. You cannot admit to what I presented to you.


              3 experts who were part of the trial explained it to you.

              The MRO's scenario was derailed as soon as he didn't request that the B sample be tested, used UNRELIABLE data, no scientific evidence presented, said that he never came across this type of case (TEST #1, TEST #2, TEST #3) and there are other explanations as he admitted to ... but YOU know why. No, the MRO wasn't thinking conspiracy like you. He was thinking that and probably Diaz told him, that will come back positive too!


              What do you call yourself in the Thunderdome?

              Travestyny the Deflector!!!



              .
              Originally posted by travestyny View Post
              That never happened. I think you need to stop faking your quotations and stop giving false information. What happened was you said mayweather abused clenbuterol and I laughed at your dumb ass.

              Don't make me go find the posts you ****ing ******.

              As for the rest of this, you know I already destroyed you.

              But if that makes you feel some type of way, step up. All my points and my sig against yours.

              You down or you gonna live your life as a bltch. I DARE YOU!!!!
              Originally posted by travestyny View Post
              Hahahaha. Numerous posters pointed you to the thunderdome. A poster mentioned it to you on your profile. A bunch of us mentioned you there so I know you got the notifications.

              You're a cowardly bltch and you know you got nothing.

              When you are ready to step up and stop being a bltch, let me know!
              More deflections and no concrete responses from

              Travestyny the Deflector!!!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                More deflections and no concrete responses from

                Travestyny the Deflector!!!
                Then put your sig and points up and stop cluttering the board, clown.

                We all see who is the deflecting coward.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                  Still at it .... In fact, YOU were the one that was wrong.

                  I told you that LABs can find out if one uses an IV because of the residue from an IV bag .... you said that I was wrong. I was right and YOU WERE WRONG!!!


                  Poor TRAV ...
                  Oh yea.....is that what happened? LMAOOOOOO.


                  Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                  The DCO could have passed the SG test but the LAB may have failed it for either being too dilute or for some other reason such as having illegal substance such as Clenbuterol which should have been found since it is a banned substance that is found in IV bags!

                  Floyd should have had higher than normal levels of Clenbuterol

                  Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  Now you're saying Clenbuterol SHOULD HAVE been found???? lol. What are you smoking???? Please stop embarrassing yourself!!!

                  You have gone full ******.
                  Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                  You are not getting it. Clenbuterol is a substance that is found in IV bags. It helps soften it up.

                  Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  You're an idiot that has no idea what he is talking about.

                  Show me where Clenbuterol is used to soften IV bags. If you can't, just admit that you are an idiot that has no idea what he is talking about, and buzz off. Got it?
                  Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                  Actually the substance is called DEHP. I made the mistake because I remember the athlete that got caught with it but he was actually caught with 2 substances. Clenbuterol and DEHP.
                  Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  Which is irrelevant isn't it. So... Like I said. You have no idea what the **** you are talking about. Thank you for proving my point!!!
                  LMAOOOOOO. PURE...****ING....OWNAGE!!!!


                  R.I.P.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    3 experts who stated that results can be dramatically different:
                    - QUEST, SMRTL and yes, even Diaz's side ....

                    Now lets see you deflect again ... you gotta stay consistent!


                    QUEST: "It is next to impossible to tie together different specimens collected at different points in time, particularly collected over different dates."
                    THIS WAS SMRTL'S RESPONSE TO THE NSAC LAWYER TRYING TO PROVE THAT DIAZ SMOKED BETWEEN 1/26 AND 1/31....JUST LIKE YOU WERE TRYING TO PROVE YOU CLOWN. I POSTED THIS QUOTATION TO YOU BECAUSE IT SHOT DOWN YOUR IDIOCY! LMAOOOOO

                    TRY AGAIN...BUT YOU SHOULD REMEMBER THAT THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL EXPLANATION FOR SOMEONE BEING AT 41NG AT 7:12PM, 733NG AT 10:38PM, AND 61NG AT 11:55PM. DID DIAZ SMOKE WEED IN THE OCTAGON? LMAOOOOOO! ****ING CLOWN. IF YOU THINK THIS QUOTATION IS ABOUT SPECIMENS TAKEN 1HOUR 17 MINUTES APART AFTER THE ATHLETE IS WATCHED BY 2 DCO'S THE ENTIRE 2 TESTS....LOL. YOU ARE A MORON.

                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    SMRTL: "nearly impossible to directly correlate exactly but it is definitely consistent (greater THC when specific gravity is greater)"
                    LMAOOOO. THIS IS YOUR PROOF? LMAOOOOOO. DO YOU MEAN SOMETHING LIKE THIS:

                    Question: So in your professional opinion to a scientific degree of certainty....are the 41ng test and the 61ng test consistent with each other?

                    Eichner: It's impossible to directly correlate exactly, but DEFINITELY CONSISTENT. THAT'S FOR SURE.

                    WAIT WAIT WAIT...IT GETS WORSE FOR YOU:

                    Eichner from SMRTL:

                    “The mass spectometry data that we do for the confirmation should definitely be consistent with other regulated programs like Quest.”


                    SOOOOOO....SMRTL SAYS TEST 1 AND 3 WERE CONSISTENT...AND SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH QUEST'S TEST. I WONDER WHAT WENT WRONG. LMAOOO.

                    OH, AND BY THE WAY, MY QUOTATIONS ARE LEGIT AND CAN BE VERIFIED. I DON'T HAVE TO ATTRIBUTE FALSE QUOTATIONS LIKE YOU, YOU PIECE OF SHlT. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO APOLOGIZE FOR DOING THAT? LMAOOOOO. YOU WERE REALLY THAT HURT ABOUT ME STOMPING A HOLE IN YOU, HUH? SORRY, BIOTCH

                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    DIAZ's expert: It requires that they follow certain protocols and standards to ensure that the outcome is similar in between different labs. They are regulating on which instruments they can use. The reagents on the instruments and the calibration on the instruments and techniques and many more ..... and without that,
                    Final results can vary dramatically as we can see here
                    (Quest vs SMRTL Labs).

                    BOOM!!!!
                    LMAOOOO. LET ME EXPLAIN THIS TO YOU ONE MORE TIME. THE MRO OFFERED THIS INFORMATION FREELY. IT'S NOT LIKE IT WAS GIVEN UNDER CROSS-EXAMINATION. THAT SHOULD BE YOUR FIRST HINT THAT YOU UNDERSTOOD IT INCORRECTLY.

                    HE IS SAYING THAT THE LABS CAN HAVE DIFFERENT RESULTS, BUT HE IS NOT SAYING THAT BOTH RESULTS ARE THE CORRECT RESULT YOU CLOWN. THIS IS OBVIOUS BECAUSE HE CLEARLY STATES THAT THE QUEST RESULT SHOULD BE THROWN OUT! THIS IS THE SAME REASON THAT WADA BUSTED SILVA BUT QUEST FOUND HIM TO BE CLEAN....AND SILVA ADMITTED TAKING THE DRUG. DIFFERENT RESULTS....AND QUEST GOOFED THE **** UP!

                    NOW IF YOU NEED ANY MORE CLARIFICATION, LET'S CLEAR IT UP IN THE THUNDERDOME SO NO ONE HAS TO SEE THE BOARD CLUTTERED WITH THIS SHlT ANYMORE. I WANT YOUR SIG. UNLESS YOU ARE TOO MUCH OF A COWARD TO STEP UP.

                    YOU REALLY GOING TO BlTCH OUT IN FRONT OF ALL THE PACROACHES THAT BEEN COMING HERE? HAVE SOME BALLS. LMAOOOOO! REMEMBER, ALL MY POINTS AND MY SIG. I'M DOWN...HOW ABOUT YOU? I BET YOU Bltch OUTTTTT!

                    BY THE WAY:


                    NOW I'M DONE UNLESS YOU WANT TO TAKE IT TO THE THUNDERDOME FOR ALL YOUR POINTS AND YOUR SIG AGAINST MY POINTS AND SIG. MAN UP OR **** OFF. THE END.

                    Comment


                    • fan of Manny and rooted for him in this fight. But he lost and just makes himself look bad by continuing this narrative. He was outboxed, whether he was shot, too old, compromised shoulder, ect is another story. But on that night Floyd won and that's not debatable.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP